Young Adults' Perceptions of 2 Publicly Available Digital Resources for Self-injury: Qualitative Study of a Peer Support App and Web-Based Factsheets.
design
digital mental health
intervention
mobile app
nonsuicidal self-injury
peer support
psychoeducation
self-harm
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jan 2023
12 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
29
07
2022
accepted:
12
12
2022
revised:
05
12
2022
entrez:
12
1
2023
pubmed:
13
1
2023
medline:
13
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Digital resources have the potential to bridge the gaps in mental health services for young people who self-injure. Most research on digital resources for this population has involved observational studies of content in web-based communities or formative studies focused on the design and early evaluation of new interventions. Far less research has sought to understand young people's experiences with publicly available digital resources or to identify specific components of these resources that are perceived to be of value in their recovery. This study aimed to understand young people's experiences with 2 publicly available digital resources for self-injury-a peer support app and web-based factsheets-and to disentangle potential explanatory mechanisms associated with perceived benefits and harms. Participants were 96 individuals (aged 16-25 years) with nonsuicidal self-injury behavior in the past month, who recently completed a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of a peer support app as compared with web-based factsheets to reduce self-injury behavior. The trial showed that participants using the peer support app reported less self-injury behavior relative to those receiving the web-based factsheets over 8 weeks. In this study, we used a conventional approach to content analysis of responses to 2 open-ended questions delivered at the end of the trial with the aims of exploring participants' overall experiences with these resources and identifying the qualities of these resources that were perceived to be beneficial to or harmful for participants' recovery. Overall, participants were more likely to report benefits than harms. Participants who used the peer support app reported more harms than those who received the web-based factsheets. In the open coding phase, clear benefits were also derived from repeated weekly surveys about self-injury. Key benefits across digital resources included enhanced self-knowledge, reduction in self-injury activity, increased outreach or informal conversations, improved attitudes toward therapy, improved mood, and feeling supported and less alone. Key challenges included worsened or unchanged self-injury activity, diminished mood, and increased barriers to outreach. The most prominent benefit derived from the web-based factsheets and weekly surveys was improved self-understanding. However, the way this manifested differed, with factsheets providing insight on why participants engage in self-injury and the function it serves them and surveys making the frequency and severity of participants' behaviors more apparent. The benefits perceived from using the peer support app were general improvements in mood and feeling less alone. Findings contribute a nuanced understanding of young people's experiences with these digital resources and have implications for the optimization of existing platforms and the design of novel resources to support individuals who self-injure.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Digital resources have the potential to bridge the gaps in mental health services for young people who self-injure. Most research on digital resources for this population has involved observational studies of content in web-based communities or formative studies focused on the design and early evaluation of new interventions. Far less research has sought to understand young people's experiences with publicly available digital resources or to identify specific components of these resources that are perceived to be of value in their recovery.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to understand young people's experiences with 2 publicly available digital resources for self-injury-a peer support app and web-based factsheets-and to disentangle potential explanatory mechanisms associated with perceived benefits and harms.
METHODS
METHODS
Participants were 96 individuals (aged 16-25 years) with nonsuicidal self-injury behavior in the past month, who recently completed a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy of a peer support app as compared with web-based factsheets to reduce self-injury behavior. The trial showed that participants using the peer support app reported less self-injury behavior relative to those receiving the web-based factsheets over 8 weeks. In this study, we used a conventional approach to content analysis of responses to 2 open-ended questions delivered at the end of the trial with the aims of exploring participants' overall experiences with these resources and identifying the qualities of these resources that were perceived to be beneficial to or harmful for participants' recovery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, participants were more likely to report benefits than harms. Participants who used the peer support app reported more harms than those who received the web-based factsheets. In the open coding phase, clear benefits were also derived from repeated weekly surveys about self-injury. Key benefits across digital resources included enhanced self-knowledge, reduction in self-injury activity, increased outreach or informal conversations, improved attitudes toward therapy, improved mood, and feeling supported and less alone. Key challenges included worsened or unchanged self-injury activity, diminished mood, and increased barriers to outreach. The most prominent benefit derived from the web-based factsheets and weekly surveys was improved self-understanding. However, the way this manifested differed, with factsheets providing insight on why participants engage in self-injury and the function it serves them and surveys making the frequency and severity of participants' behaviors more apparent. The benefits perceived from using the peer support app were general improvements in mood and feeling less alone.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Findings contribute a nuanced understanding of young people's experiences with these digital resources and have implications for the optimization of existing platforms and the design of novel resources to support individuals who self-injure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36633896
pii: v7i1e41546
doi: 10.2196/41546
pmc: PMC9880808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e41546Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : T32 MH115882
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
©Kaylee Payne Kruzan, Janis Whitlock, Julia Chapman, Aparajita Bhandari, Natalya Bazarova. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 12.01.2023.
Références
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Jun;44(3):273-303
pubmed: 24422986
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jul;161(7):634-40
pubmed: 17606825
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Nov 23;3(4):e49
pubmed: 27881358
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jun;85(6):620-631
pubmed: 28414488
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):477-84
pubmed: 26911822
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):443-9
pubmed: 24663445
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;56(2):107-115
pubmed: 28117056
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 28;8(1):e21854
pubmed: 33507154
Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(1):69-79
pubmed: 25706352
Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):407-17
pubmed: 16756433
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 23;5(1):e16
pubmed: 29475823
J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Mar;39(3):306-14
pubmed: 19756992
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103983
pubmed: 34688102
Front Digit Health. 2022 Jun 29;4:913599
pubmed: 35847416
Arch Suicide Res. 2013;17(3):223-35
pubmed: 23889572
J Adolesc. 2005 Aug;28(4):573-87
pubmed: 16022890
Arch Suicide Res. 2011;15(4):390-6
pubmed: 22023646
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 02;19(23):
pubmed: 36498234
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2016 May;2016:1109-1113
pubmed: 28503678
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):151-179
pubmed: 31448847
Arch Suicide Res. 2012;16(3):263-72
pubmed: 22852787
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e77555
pubmed: 24204868
J Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;21(2):250-60
pubmed: 24707032
J Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar;72(3):249-62
pubmed: 26613372
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1516-1528
pubmed: 34656203
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 10;6(1):e26526
pubmed: 35006076
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 15;239:171-179
pubmed: 30014957
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012 Mar 30;6(1):14
pubmed: 22463499
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4):486-92
pubmed: 23298982
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 25;6(7):e39004
pubmed: 35877163
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Jun;84(6):544-57
pubmed: 27018530
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 30;6(1):e32
pubmed: 29382632
Arch Suicide Res. 2007;11(2):129-47
pubmed: 17453692
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jan 23;5(1):e9
pubmed: 29362208
Digit Health. 2020 Sep 23;6:2055207620958913
pubmed: 33029355
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(1):1-29
pubmed: 25256034
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Mar;68(3):532-539
pubmed: 32753343
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 13;4(4):e44
pubmed: 29030324
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 24;8(12):e31367
pubmed: 34951602
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181722
pubmed: 28813437
J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(8):691-8
pubmed: 21950249
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 13;16(1):63
pubmed: 31409357
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Aug;37(4):422-30
pubmed: 17896882
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 15;17(1):297
pubmed: 28810841
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Jul;87:102038
pubmed: 34034038
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155813
pubmed: 27191728