Clinical Implementation of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in an Outpatient Neurorehabilitation Program.
Journal
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 1537-7385
Titre abrégé: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8803677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
entrez:
12
1
2023
pubmed:
13
1
2023
medline:
17
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Motor, speech, and cognitive impairments are the most common consequences of neurological disorders. There has been an increasing interest in the use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment the effects of neurorehabilitation. Numerous research studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation are highly promising neuromodulation tools that can work as adjuvants to standard neurorehabilitation services, including physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology. However, to date, there are vast differences in methodology in studies including noninvasive brain stimulation parameters, patient characteristics, time point of intervention after injury, and outcome measures, making it difficult to translate and implement transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in the clinical setting. Despite this, a series of principles are thought to underlie the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques. We developed a noninvasive brain stimulation rehabilitation program using these principles to provide best practices for applying transcranial direct current stimulation and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation as rehabilitation adjuvants in the clinical setting to help improve neurorehabilitation outcomes. This article outlines our approach, philosophy, and experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36634336
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002135
pii: 00002060-202302001-00015
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S79-S84Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure statements have been obtained, and no conflicts of interest have been reported by the authors or by any individuals in control of the content of this article.
Références
Feigin VL, Vos T, Nichols E, et al.: The global burden of neurological disorders: translating evidence into policy. Lancet Neurol 2020;19:255–65
Sandrini M, Cohen LG: Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Handb Clin Neurol 2013;116:499–524
Page SJ, Cunningham DA, Plow E, et al.: It takes two: noninvasive brain stimulation combined with neurorehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96(4 suppl):S89–93
Elsner B, Kwakkel G, Kugler J, et al.: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving capacity in activities and arm function after stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017;14:95
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, et al.: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;5:CD009760
Breining BL, Sebastian R: Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2020;8:44–56
Pruski A, Cantarero G: Transcranial direct current stimulation for motor recovery following brain injury. Cur Phys Med Rehab Rep 2020;8:268–79
Nitsche MA, Paulus W: Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001;57:1899–901
Floel A, Cohen LG: Recovery of function in humans: cortical stimulation and pharmacological treatments after stroke. Neurobiol Dis 2010;37:243–51
Monai H, Ohkura M, Tanaka M, et al.: Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain. Nat Commun 2016;7:11100
Nitsche MA, Jaussi W, Liebetanz D, et al.: Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by d -cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004;29:1573–8
Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, et al.: Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron 2010;66:198–204
Podda MV, Cocco S, Mastrodonato A, et al.: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation boosts synaptic plasticity and memory in mice via epigenetic regulation of Bdnf expression. Sci Rep 2016;6:22180
Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Johansen-Berg H: The role of GABA in human motor learning. Curr Biol 2011;21:480–4
Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, et al.: Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:1590–5
Hallett M: Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007;55:187–99
Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV: Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul 2013;6:1–3
Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al.: Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997;48:1398–403
Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Wassermann EM, et al.: Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 1994;117:847–58
Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC: Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci 2018;21:174–87
Hardwick RM, Celnik PA: Non-invasive brain stimulation in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Cur Phys Med Rehab Rep 2014;2:300–9
Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, et al.: Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol 2014;125:2150–206
Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, et al.: Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol 2017;128:56–92
Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, et al.: Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimul 2016;9:641–61
Fried PJ, Santarnecchi E, Antal A, et al.: Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: recommendations from an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2021;132:819–37
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, et al.: A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7
Tung YC, Lai CH, Liao CD, et al.: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of lower limb motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2019;33:1102–12
Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, et al.: Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007;25:123–9
Nikolin S, Huggins C, Martin D, et al.: Safety of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation: a systematic review. Brain Stimul 2018;11:278–88
Borich M, Arora S, Kimberley TJ: Lasting effects of repeated rTMS application in focal hand dystonia. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009;27:55–65