Antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus YT and its cell-surface extract.
Antibacterial
Antibiofilm
Cell-surface extract
Lactobacillus rhamnosus YT
Physicochemical properties
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 01 2023
12 01 2023
Historique:
received:
20
10
2022
accepted:
28
12
2022
entrez:
12
1
2023
pubmed:
13
1
2023
medline:
17
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria survived in the biofilm pose a serious threat to food safety and human health. It is urgent to find safe and effective methods to control the planktonic bacteria as well as the biofilm formation. Substances with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity found in lactic acid bacteria were mainly metabolites secreted in the cell-free supernatant. Previously, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus YT was isolated because its cell pellets displayed distinguished antibacterial activity under neutral conditions. This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of the L. rhamnosus YT cells and its crude cell-surface extract. The antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells constantly increased with cells growth and reached the peak value after the cells grew into stationary phase. After cocultivation with the L. rhamnosus YT cells, the biofilm formation of B. subtilis and S. enterica was reduced. The antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells was varied along with various culture conditions (carbon sources, nitrogen sources, medium pH and cultural temperatures) and the antibacterial intensity (antibacterial activity per cell) was disproportional to the biomass. Furthermore, the cell-surface extract was isolated and displayed broad antimicrobial spectrum with a bacteriostatic mode of action. The antibiofilm activity of the extract was concentration-dependent. In addition, the extract was stable to physicochemical treatments (heat, pH and protease). The extract performed favorable emulsifying property which could reduce the water surface tension from 72.708 mN/m to 51.011 mN/m and the critical micelle concentration (CMC) value was 6.88 mg/mL. Besides, the extract was also able to emulsify hydrocarbon substrates with the emulsification, index (E24) ranged from 38.55% (for n-hexane) to 53.78% (for xylene). The E24 for xylene/extract emulsion was merely decreased by 5.77% after standing for 120 h. The main components of the extract were polysaccharide (684.63 μg/mL) and protein (120.79 μg/mL). The properties of the extract indicated that it might be a kind of biosurfactant. These data suggested that L. rhamnosus YT and the cell-surface extract could be used as an alternative antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria in food industry.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria survived in the biofilm pose a serious threat to food safety and human health. It is urgent to find safe and effective methods to control the planktonic bacteria as well as the biofilm formation. Substances with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity found in lactic acid bacteria were mainly metabolites secreted in the cell-free supernatant. Previously, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus YT was isolated because its cell pellets displayed distinguished antibacterial activity under neutral conditions. This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of the L. rhamnosus YT cells and its crude cell-surface extract.
RESULTS
The antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells constantly increased with cells growth and reached the peak value after the cells grew into stationary phase. After cocultivation with the L. rhamnosus YT cells, the biofilm formation of B. subtilis and S. enterica was reduced. The antibacterial activity of the L. rhamnosus YT cells was varied along with various culture conditions (carbon sources, nitrogen sources, medium pH and cultural temperatures) and the antibacterial intensity (antibacterial activity per cell) was disproportional to the biomass. Furthermore, the cell-surface extract was isolated and displayed broad antimicrobial spectrum with a bacteriostatic mode of action. The antibiofilm activity of the extract was concentration-dependent. In addition, the extract was stable to physicochemical treatments (heat, pH and protease). The extract performed favorable emulsifying property which could reduce the water surface tension from 72.708 mN/m to 51.011 mN/m and the critical micelle concentration (CMC) value was 6.88 mg/mL. Besides, the extract was also able to emulsify hydrocarbon substrates with the emulsification, index (E24) ranged from 38.55% (for n-hexane) to 53.78% (for xylene). The E24 for xylene/extract emulsion was merely decreased by 5.77% after standing for 120 h. The main components of the extract were polysaccharide (684.63 μg/mL) and protein (120.79 μg/mL).
CONCLUSION
The properties of the extract indicated that it might be a kind of biosurfactant. These data suggested that L. rhamnosus YT and the cell-surface extract could be used as an alternative antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent against foodborne pathogens and spoilage bacteria in food industry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36635630
doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02751-3
pii: 10.1186/s12866-022-02751-3
pmc: PMC9835366
doi:
Substances chimiques
Xylenes
0
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Anti-Infective Agents
0
Plant Extracts
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2134:53-65
pubmed: 32632859
Microbiologyopen. 2021 Feb;10(2):e1173
pubmed: 33970542
Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Oct 15;139:252-261
pubmed: 31374277
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Jun 10;56(8):1262-74
pubmed: 25675115
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;10(12):
pubmed: 34943758
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 27;9(1):5287
pubmed: 30918296
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8165-73
pubmed: 16332799
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;30(9):2459-69
pubmed: 24849010
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Mar-Apr;16(2):87-94
pubmed: 30820202
Molecules. 2017 Jul 26;22(8):
pubmed: 28933759
J Basic Microbiol. 2016 Nov;56(11):1140-1158
pubmed: 27436796
Food Funct. 2020 May 1;11(5):4697-4706
pubmed: 32406901
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):
pubmed: 34948921
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 05;10:1272
pubmed: 31231350
J Microbiol. 2019 Apr;57(4):310-315
pubmed: 30671742
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Feb 13;2018:5034783
pubmed: 29651438
Front Microbiol. 2021 Nov 15;12:758161
pubmed: 34867884
J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Mar;22(3):1972-1983
pubmed: 29316223
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):250
pubmed: 27793096
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jan 15;112:95-101
pubmed: 29138104
Int J Biol Macromol. 2017 Sep;102:76-83
pubmed: 28366852
Virulence. 2018 Jan 1;9(1):522-554
pubmed: 28362216
J Microbiol. 2017 Oct;55(10):753-766
pubmed: 28956348
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 21;7(1):265
pubmed: 28325944
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014 Feb;172(4):1777-89
pubmed: 24258794
Peptides. 2014 Oct;60:32-40
pubmed: 25088158
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Nov 15;9(1):469-479
pubmed: 33473308
Int J Biol Macromol. 2015 Mar;74:119-26
pubmed: 25532782
Int J Biol Macromol. 2015 Aug;79:527-32
pubmed: 25841372
Ceska Slov Farm. 2018 Winter;67(3):107-112
pubmed: 30630327
Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Apr 1;233:115857
pubmed: 32059908
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006 Jun;259(1):89-96
pubmed: 16684107
Int J Environ Health Res. 2021 Jun;31(4):401-420
pubmed: 31509014
AMB Express. 2018 Jan 24;8(1):10
pubmed: 29368243
Int J Biol Macromol. 2022 Nov 1;220:291-306
pubmed: 35981676
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 Feb;105(4):1647-1656
pubmed: 33475795
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019 Jun;139:246-252
pubmed: 30991089
Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 May 1;150:400-412
pubmed: 32045605
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 27;9(1):2900
pubmed: 30814593
Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2014 Sep-Oct;(5):119-26
pubmed: 25536783