Distribution of methanogenic and methanotrophic consortia at soil-water interfaces in rice paddies across climate zones.
Biogeoscience
Global carbon cycle
Microbiology
Journal
iScience
ISSN: 2589-0042
Titre abrégé: iScience
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101724038
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jan 2023
20 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
revised:
15
11
2022
accepted:
19
12
2022
entrez:
13
1
2023
pubmed:
14
1
2023
medline:
14
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Periphytic biofilms (PB) at the soil-water interface contributes 7-38% of the methane emission from rice paddies, yet the biogeographical mechanism underlying and affecting the process remain elusive. In this study, rice fields along an edapho-vclimatic gradient were sampled, and the environmental drivers affecting distribution of methanogenic and methanotrophic communities were evaluated. The methanogenic and methanotrophic communities at soil-water interface showed less complex inter/intra-generic interactions than those in soil, and their relative abundances were weakly driven by spatial distance, soil organic carbon, soil total nitrogen and pH. The nutrient supply and buffering capacity of extracellular polymeric substance released by PB reduced their interaction and enhanced the resilience on edaphic environment changes. Climate affected soil metal content, extracellular polymeric substance content, and thus the methane-related communities, and caused geographical variation in the impacts of PB on methane emissions from rice paddies. This study facilitates our understanding of geographical differences in the contribution of PB to methane emission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36636345
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105851
pii: S2589-0042(22)02124-1
pmc: PMC9829807
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
105851Informations de copyright
© 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
mSystems. 2020 Jun 9;5(3):
pubmed: 32518195
ISME J. 2012 Jun;6(6):1115-26
pubmed: 22189499
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013 Jun;84(3):495-509
pubmed: 23346920
Microbes Environ. 2010;25(3):156-63
pubmed: 21576868
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006 Jun;17(3):262-7
pubmed: 16621512
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:874-896
pubmed: 27575427
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Mar;8(3):394-404
pubmed: 16478446
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6:439-67
pubmed: 24015900
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013 Jun;5(3):335-45
pubmed: 23754714
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2011 Jun;3(3):320-8
pubmed: 23761278
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1058-1069
pubmed: 30743903
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):E836-45
pubmed: 24550501
Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2005 Jul-Aug;7(4):253-71
pubmed: 16075348
Bioresour Technol. 2020 May;303:122922
pubmed: 32044647
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21377-21384
pubmed: 27502563
Front Microbiol. 2017 May 29;8:945
pubmed: 28611747
Metallomics. 2016 Sep 1;8(9):931-40
pubmed: 27087171
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Oct 15;596-597:136-146
pubmed: 28431358
Innovation (Camb). 2021 Nov 26;3(1):100192
pubmed: 34950915
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Aug;6(8):579-91
pubmed: 18587410
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Apr;88(1):195-212
pubmed: 24410836
Chemosphere. 2021 Sep;278:130414
pubmed: 33819887
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jul;11(7):1844-53
pubmed: 19508556
Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):220-7
pubmed: 10821282
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Feb;4(2):102-12
pubmed: 16415926
Trends Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;38(11):1292-1303
pubmed: 32307119
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013 May;342(1):18-23
pubmed: 23448092
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jun 25;6:639
pubmed: 26161079
Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 13;8:2127
pubmed: 29180985
Environ Microbiol. 2019 May;21(5):1702-1717
pubmed: 30680883
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2016 Feb;8(1):122-31
pubmed: 26617278
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2761-6
pubmed: 17296935
Trends Biotechnol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1171-1182
pubmed: 30029801
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):926-36
pubmed: 27264635