Decision making for invasive and non-invasive optional procedures within an acute HIV research cohort in Bangkok.

Clinical research ethics Decision-making HIV research Optional procedures Research biopsies Research cohorts

Journal

Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 09 08 2022
revised: 16 11 2022
accepted: 18 12 2022
entrez: 13 1 2023
pubmed: 14 1 2023
medline: 14 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical research regularly includes required, nontherapeutic procedures to answer research questions. Optional procedures usually offer minimal or no personal benefit and may involve harms and burdens. Members from the Bangkok SEARCH010/RV254 HIV research cohort of individuals acutely HIV-infected are recruited to six optional procedures varying in invasiveness: leukapheresis, genital secretions collection, lumbar puncture, brain MRI/MRS/DTI, colon biopsy, and lymph node biopsy. We surveyed cohort members about their first recruitment for each procedure to examine factors associated with decision making and attitudes about compensation. 406 members (68%) completed the survey. Reported procedure participation ranged from 71% (MRI) to 27% (lymph node biopsy). Respondents underwent 0-6 procedure types (median 3). Ordinal regression indicated that lower perceived HIV impact and HIV remission trial participation were associated with more procedures completed. Reports of decision difficulty varied, and feeling pressured by research staff was low overall. Notably, those who declined procedures and those who underwent more invasive procedures reported greater decision difficulty and perceived pressure. Most respondents felt compensation amounts were appropriate, although opinions differed by procedure, and for some procedures, between people who agreed and declined. There is limited literature regarding consent to and attitudes about optional research procedures. Researchers must consider how to best support voluntary decisions for procedures with little personal benefit, particularly in lower-income or marginalized populations. In this longitudinal research cohort, perceived pressure to participate may be a concern, although our finding of variation in participation rates corresponding to invasiveness is reassuring. Data from different research contexts would provide important comparators.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36636463
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101054
pii: S2451-8654(22)00171-5
pmc: PMC9829688
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101054

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Références

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Feb;70(3):455-464
pubmed: 19926187
IRB. 2012 Sep-Oct;34(5):1-7
pubmed: 23072039
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;23(21):6450-6457
pubmed: 28754815
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):860-8
pubmed: 22580210
IRB. 2014 May-Jun;36(3):9-15
pubmed: 24946507
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Oct 1;79(2):244-248
pubmed: 30212436
J Virus Erad. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):40-50.e21
pubmed: 28275457
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1041-1042
pubmed: 29799989
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;63(4):555-61
pubmed: 27317797
J Virus Erad. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):16-20
pubmed: 29568548
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Jul;11(3):237-49
pubmed: 27381010
J Virus Erad. 2015 Jan 1;1(2):51-53
pubmed: 25866844
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Apr 1;109(4):
pubmed: 28376159
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4793-5
pubmed: 17050863
J Clin Invest. 2005 Jul;115(7):1681-7
pubmed: 16007244
AIDS. 2015 Apr 24;29(7):793-800
pubmed: 25985402
J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):270-276
pubmed: 29127137
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):584-590
pubmed: 33165552
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Mar;22(3):e25260
pubmed: 30869203
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7
pubmed: 16731240
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Dec;16(4):535-549
pubmed: 31713712
J Virus Erad. 2020 Feb 20;6(1):7-10
pubmed: 32175085

Auteurs

Sinéad Isaacson (S)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Kristine Kuczynski (K)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Nuchanart Ormsby (N)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Holly L Peay (HL)

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.

Stuart Rennie (S)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

R Jean Cadigan (RJ)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Eugène Kroon (E)

SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nittaya Phanuphak (N)

SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand.

Jintanat Ananworanich (J)

Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, And Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Thidarat Jupimai (T)

Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Peeriya Prueksakaew (P)

SEARCH, Institute of HIV Research and Innovation, Bangkok, Thailand.

Gail E Henderson (GE)

Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Classifications MeSH