Surgical Treatment of Adams Type IV Anterolateral Fracture of the Ulna Coronoid Process.
Anterolateral fracture
Combined injury
Elbow instability
Surgical treatment
Ulna coronoid process
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
revised:
09
11
2022
received:
23
08
2022
accepted:
23
11
2022
medline:
18
8
2023
pubmed:
14
1
2023
entrez:
13
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anterolateral coronal fractures are so rare that the mechanism of injury, the type of combined fracture and ligament injury, and the optimal treatment are unknown. To study the outcome of surgical treatments for anterolateral (AL) fracture of the ulna coronoid process (Adams Type IV) and summarize the characteristics of this type of fracture and to guide clinical applications. From February 2015 to April 2021, 32 patients were included in the study. All patients had standard radiography with anteroposterior and lateral views, computed tomography, and intraoperative fluoroscopy. All patients were treated surgically. Surgery-related information, including surgical approach, operation duration, blood loss, and repairing the lateral collateral ligament and the medial collateral ligament integrity, were recorded. The patient's clinical details, such as the final range of motion (ROM), the Broberg-Morrey scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the last follow-up, were described. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis. We divided patients into two groups according to the anterolateral coronoid fracture morphology. In the intact group, 20 patients with an intact anterolateral coronoid fracture fragment. In the comminuted group, 12 patients with comminuted anterolateral coronoid fracture fragments extended the less sigmoid notch of the ulna. There was no difference in age, sex, total incision length, follow-up duration, and recovery with rehabilitation among the two groups (all Ps >0.05). The other follow-up outcomes, such as elbow ROM (Flexion, Extension, Posterior rotation, Anterior rotation), VAS score, or Broberg-Morrey scores, were not different between the two groups (all Ps >0.05). Both groups achieved relatively satisfactory clinical outcomes, and the Broberg-Morrey score and index excellence rate reached 84.38%. There is a statistical difference in the history of elbow dislocation (P = 0.017), radial head fracture type (P = 0.041), operation duration (P = 0.014) and blood loss at operation (P = 0.029) between the two groups. Cannulated screws, anchors, and sutures were used as point fixation in the coronoid process of the ulna. There was a statistical difference between the two groups in the choice of internal fixation (P = 0.020). For anterolateral ulnar coronoid fractures with different degrees of comminution, effective and reliable surgical treatment can achieve better results and fewer complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36636909
doi: 10.1111/os.13634
pmc: PMC10432438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2033-2041Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Oct;39(10):2041-6
pubmed: 25070699
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):35-43
pubmed: 34842363
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):e1-4
pubmed: 20888261
Br J Surg. 1954 Sep;42(172):123-32
pubmed: 13209035
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jun;21(6):782-8
pubmed: 22516571
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 May-Jun;12(3):287-92
pubmed: 12851584
Orthop Surg. 2020 Oct;12(5):1448-1455
pubmed: 32790243
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):669-74
pubmed: 3722222
Injury. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-6
pubmed: 22075448
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Oct;71(9):1348-54
pubmed: 2793888
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019 Feb 27;9(1):e8
pubmed: 31086726
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jan;31(1):45-52
pubmed: 16443103
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):213-7
pubmed: 17399625
Emerg Radiol. 2022 Feb;29(1):133-145
pubmed: 34403038
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(12):461-468
pubmed: 28461924
Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:113-34
pubmed: 12690844
Clin Med Res. 2008 May;6(1):40-4
pubmed: 18591378