Implementing electronic patient reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease: patient participation, score reliability and validity.
IBD control
Patient participation
Patient reported outcome measure
Reliability
Validity
Journal
Health and quality of life outcomes
ISSN: 1477-7525
Titre abrégé: Health Qual Life Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2023
13 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2022
accepted:
04
01
2023
entrez:
13
1
2023
pubmed:
14
1
2023
medline:
18
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended for assessing patient-centered outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The main aims were to assess the level of participation in an electronic PROM (ePROM) data collection system among patients with IBD, and evaluate reliability and validity of the resulting scores. Patients included in the IBD registry of Maccabi Healthcare Services, a state-mandated healthcare provider for over 2.6 million people in Israel, were invited to complete the IBD-Control measure and a general health item, with follow-up ePROMs at 3 and 6 months including a global rating of change item. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics by participation rate, and assess survey completion time. Initial scores were assessed for internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient from paired scores of patients identified as unchanged between the initial and first follow-up. Construct validity was assessed by the ability of IBD-control scores to discriminate between patient sub-groups in expected ways. Empirical validity was assessed using ePROM score correlations with laboratory markers of disease activity. Score coverage was also assessed. A total of 13,588 patients were invited to participate [Mean age = 49 years (SD = 17); females = 51%]. Participation rate was 31.5%. Participants compared to non-participants were slightly older, were more likely to be female, to have a history of biologic treatment, to have higher socio-economic status, and to be more experienced in the usage of the digital patient portal. Median survey completion time was approximately 1:30 min. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. Scores discriminated between patient sub-groups in clinically expected ways, with expected correlations to laboratory markers of disease activity. A notable ceiling effect was observed (> 15%) for IBD-Control scores. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the ePROM system was supported for measuring the level of perceived disease control in patients diagnosed with IBD in Israel. Additional research is needed to identify ways to increase patient participation, assess clinical implications of the identified measurement ceiling of the IBD-control, and evaluate the added value of the derived scores in support of clinical decision making.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recommended for assessing patient-centered outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The main aims were to assess the level of participation in an electronic PROM (ePROM) data collection system among patients with IBD, and evaluate reliability and validity of the resulting scores.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients included in the IBD registry of Maccabi Healthcare Services, a state-mandated healthcare provider for over 2.6 million people in Israel, were invited to complete the IBD-Control measure and a general health item, with follow-up ePROMs at 3 and 6 months including a global rating of change item. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics by participation rate, and assess survey completion time. Initial scores were assessed for internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient from paired scores of patients identified as unchanged between the initial and first follow-up. Construct validity was assessed by the ability of IBD-control scores to discriminate between patient sub-groups in expected ways. Empirical validity was assessed using ePROM score correlations with laboratory markers of disease activity. Score coverage was also assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 13,588 patients were invited to participate [Mean age = 49 years (SD = 17); females = 51%]. Participation rate was 31.5%. Participants compared to non-participants were slightly older, were more likely to be female, to have a history of biologic treatment, to have higher socio-economic status, and to be more experienced in the usage of the digital patient portal. Median survey completion time was approximately 1:30 min. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. Scores discriminated between patient sub-groups in clinically expected ways, with expected correlations to laboratory markers of disease activity. A notable ceiling effect was observed (> 15%) for IBD-Control scores.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the ePROM system was supported for measuring the level of perceived disease control in patients diagnosed with IBD in Israel. Additional research is needed to identify ways to increase patient participation, assess clinical implications of the identified measurement ceiling of the IBD-control, and evaluate the added value of the derived scores in support of clinical decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36639633
doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02087-0
pii: 10.1186/s12955-023-02087-0
pmc: PMC9837960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Comp Eff Res. 2016 Aug;5(5):507-19
pubmed: 27427277
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;34(6):996-1003
pubmed: 30562421
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15
pubmed: 2691207
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb;56(2):155-161
pubmed: 33300822
Digestion. 2020;101 Suppl 1:98-104
pubmed: 31995797
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Dec;49(12):875-886
pubmed: 31291550
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Mar 1;11(suppl_2):S576-S585
pubmed: 27797917
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Digit Health. 2016 Jun 16;2:2055207616644844
pubmed: 29942553
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Jun;28(2):212-32
pubmed: 15851774
Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80
pubmed: 19543809
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2019 Oct 02;3(10):
pubmed: 31773074
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):1-10
pubmed: 31112238
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jul 04;4:90
pubmed: 29997899
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021 Jul 27;27(8):1177-1183
pubmed: 33043982
J Crohns Colitis. 2018 Mar 28;12(4):408-418
pubmed: 29216349
Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):703-7
pubmed: 21110703
JMIR Cancer. 2018 Dec 20;4(2):e11373
pubmed: 30573450
Harefuah. 2018 Oct;157(10):655-659
pubmed: 30343545
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun;110(6):802-19; quiz 820
pubmed: 25964225
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1089-1101
pubmed: 31498717
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):497-520
pubmed: 31339560
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):648-663.e3
pubmed: 29074448
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 24;14(10):e0223893
pubmed: 31647834
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):208
pubmed: 31730474
J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 1;53(3):297-306
pubmed: 10760641
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 07;10:671-681
pubmed: 29922093
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:136-141
pubmed: 28433678
J Crohns Colitis. 2011 Jun;5(3):203-10
pubmed: 21575882
Gut. 2014 Jul;63(7):1092-102
pubmed: 24107590
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768
pubmed: 29481436