Comparison of posterior cranial fossa morphometric measurements in Chiari type I patients with and without syrinx cavity on magnetic resonance imaging.

Chiari malformation type I MRI posterior cranial fossa syrinx

Journal

Polish journal of radiology
ISSN: 1733-134X
Titre abrégé: Pol J Radiol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101175532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 12 02 2022
accepted: 15 06 2022
entrez: 16 1 2023
pubmed: 17 1 2023
medline: 17 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare the posterior fossa measurements of Chiari type I malformation (CHM1) patients with and without syrinx and with a control group. The patients with syrinx were divided into 2 groupd according to syrinx width/cord width (S/C) ratios: group 1 - S/C ratio < 50%; group 2 - S/C ratio > 50%. The length of the clivus, the AP length of the foramen magnum, the AP length of the posterior fossa, the perpendicular distance between the McRae line and (a) the splenium of corpus callosum, (b) the pons, and (c) the fastigium of the 160 patients and of the 160 control patients were statistically compared. In addition, the measurements of the patients with and without syrinx, according to the S/C ratio, were statistically compared. Syrinx was present in 59 (36.8 %) of the 160 patients. The S/C ratio was < 50% in 30 (50.9 %) of them, and S/C ratio > 50% in 29 (49.1%) of them. All the measurements in the patient group, except of the AP length of the foramen magnum, were statistically significantly lower than in the control group ( The S/C ratio can be a guide to the underlying aetiology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36643005
doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.123895
pii: 49810
pmc: PMC9834072
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e694-e700

Informations de copyright

Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Références

J Neurol Sci. 2004 May 15;220(1-2):3-21
pubmed: 15140600
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1833-1838
pubmed: 28684453
Neurosurg Rev. 2010 Jul;33(3):271-84; discussion 284-5
pubmed: 20532585
J Spine Surg. 2018 Mar;4(1):45-54
pubmed: 29732422
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 May/Jun;30(3):818-822
pubmed: 31048611
Neuroradiology. 2020 Nov;62(11):1389-1400
pubmed: 32418026
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Nov;58(5):454-61
pubmed: 26713146
J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;45(1):23-31
pubmed: 28826656
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 Feb;144(2):165-71; discussion 171
pubmed: 11862517
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Aug;8(2):205-13
pubmed: 21806364
Surg Neurol. 2005 Sep;64(3):237-41; discussion 241
pubmed: 16099255
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2202-9
pubmed: 26821142
Radiology. 1992 May;183(2):347-53
pubmed: 1561334
Neurosurgery. 1991 Mar;28(3):353-7
pubmed: 2011216
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):1758-63
pubmed: 23493894
Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2005 Dec 18;2:11
pubmed: 16359556
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct;35(10):2021-6
pubmed: 24831593

Auteurs

Gulec Mert Dogan (GM)

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Ahmet Sigirci (A)

Department of Pediatric Radiology, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Bora Tetik (B)

Department of Neurosurgery, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Ramazan Pasahan (R)

Department of Neurosurgery, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Cagatay Onal (C)

Department of Neurosurgery, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Ahmet K Arslan (AK)

Department of Biostatistics, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH