Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain.
Low back pain
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Neurotropin
Walking speed
Journal
Pain and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8237
Titre abrégé: Pain Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634491
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
29
11
2022
accepted:
20
12
2022
pubmed:
17
1
2023
medline:
17
1
2023
entrez:
16
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We compared the clinical effects of Neurotropin, limaprost alfadex, and a combination of both drugs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with low back pain (LBP). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial from March 2021 to May 2022. Participants were patients diagnosed with LSS by MRI and were randomly assigned to three groups: Neurotropin/limaprost combination (NL group), Neurotropin (N group), and limaprost group (L group). Participants received the drugs administered orally for 12 weeks, and each examination and observation was performed before any drug administration and every 2 weeks thereafter. We recorded age, sex, height, weight, duration of symptoms, intermittent claudication distance, level of stenosis in MRI, and concomitant analgesics as examination items in the trial period. Items measured during the trial were visual analog scale (VAS) score (mm) for LBP, leg pain and numbness, walking activity (walking speed, stride length), standing balance (3 m Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test results, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) results), LBP/Quality of Life (QOL)-related scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro QOL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)), psychological factors (Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) scores), and adverse events. Each item was evaluated using changes at each visit (weeks 2-12) from baseline value before drug administration (week 0), and changes were considered significant when p < 0.05. We included results from 64 patients in the present study; 24 were assigned to the NL group (mean age 71.2 years), 20 to the N group (mean age 76.2 years), and 20 to the L group (mean age 74.4 years). There were no significant differences between the three groups in patient characteristics, concomitant analgesics, or baseline VAS score, gait balance, or QOL-related scores (p ≥ 0.05). The VAS and leg pain scores were significantly improved in Group L, and LBP was improved significantly in Group N. QOL and ODI scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups, EQ-5D score improved significantly in the L group, and RDQ score improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Psychological factor and PCS scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups (p < 0.05). Walking speed and stride length were improved significantly in the NL and N groups (p < 0.05). TUG/FTSST scores were improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Leg pain VAS score was improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the L group compared with the NL group after 6 and 12 weeks of administration, and LBP VAS was improved significantly in the N group after 6 weeks compared with the NL group (p < 0.05). Walking speed was significantly improved in the NL group after 2 weeks compared with the N group and improved significantly in the NL group after 6 weeks (p < 0.05) compared with the L group. RDQ was decreased significantly in the L group compared with the NL group after 8 weeks (p < 0.05). Combined use of Neurotropin and limaprost showed an additional effect on walking speed compared with single drug administration. Neurotropin may contribute to the improvement of low back pain, walking speed/stride length, and standing balance. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200282).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36645650
doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z
pii: 10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z
pmc: PMC10036710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
461-473Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1954;36(2):230–7.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.36B2.230
Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;115:4–5.
Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818–25.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097
pubmed: 18287604
Katz JN, Zimmerman ZE, Mass H, Makhni MC. Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(17):1688–99.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.5921
pubmed: 35503342
Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama Spine Study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20:1103–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.06.018
Kobayashi S. Pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar canal stenosis. World J Orthop. 2014;5:135–45.
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i2.134
Matsudaira K, Seichi A, Kunogi J, et al. The efficacy of prostaglandin E1 derivative in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(2):115–20.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818f924d
pubmed: 19112336
Onda A, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, et al. Limaprost alfadex and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for sciatica due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(4):794–801.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2551-1
pubmed: 23090093
Kim HJ, Kim JH, Park YS, et al. Comparative study of the efficacy of limaprost and pregabalin as single agents and in combination for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Spine J. 2016;16(6):756–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.049
pubmed: 27045252
Hata T, Kita T, Itoh E, Oyama R, Kawabata A. Mechanism of the analgesic effect of Neurotropin. Jpn J Pharmacol. 1988;48:165–73.
doi: 10.1254/jjp.48.165
pubmed: 3210443
Kawamura M, Ohara H, Go K, Koga Y, Ienaga K. Neurotropin induces antinociceptive effect by enhancing descending pain inhibitory systems involving 5-HT
doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00195-7
pubmed: 9627076
Nishimoto S, Okada K, Tanaka H, et al. Neurotropin attenuates local inflammatory response and inhibits demyelination induced by chronic constriction injury of the mouse sciatic nerve. Biologicals. 2016;44:206–11.
doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2016.03.005
pubmed: 27233579
Toda K, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. Antinociceptive effects of Neurotropin in a rat model of painful peripheral mononeuropathy. Life Sci. 1998;62:913–21.
doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00009-5
pubmed: 9496714
Saleh M, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. Effects of Neurotropin on hyperalgesia and allodynia in mononeuropathic rats. Life Sci. 1998;63:1931–8.
doi: 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00469-X
pubmed: 9825771
Suzuki T, Li YH, Mashimo T. The antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects of Neurotropin in mice with spinal nerve ligation. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(3):793–9.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000160582.25368.B9
pubmed: 16115993
Ohara H, Namimatsu A, Fukuhara K, et al. Release of inflammatory mediators by noxious stimuli; effect of Neurotropin on the release. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;157:93–9.
doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90475-X
pubmed: 3234497
Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. Asian Working Group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300-307.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012
pubmed: 32033882
Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Yamanaka H, et al. Associations between sarcopenia and degenerative lumbar scoliosis in older women. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12:9.
doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0116-0
pubmed: 28331906
pmcid: 5356321