Are Mindfulness and Mind-Wandering Opposite Constructs? It Depends on How Mindfulness is Conceptualised.

SART acceptance mind-wandering mindfulness

Journal

Psychological reports
ISSN: 1558-691X
Titre abrégé: Psychol Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376475

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jan 2023
Historique:
entrez: 16 1 2023
pubmed: 17 1 2023
medline: 17 1 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study investigated if trait mindfulness and its components, mindful attention, acceptance, and non-judging correlate negatively with self-reported and indirect markers of mind-wandering. The 552 participants of the study completed an anonymous online questionnaire consisting of trait mindfulness and mind-wandering scales. They also completed the computer-based Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), an objective measure of mind-wandering. The total mindfulness score and acceptance and non-judging subscale scores were strongly negatively correlated with both self-reported trait mind-wandering (TMW) and SART indices of mind-wandering. In contrast, attention was significantly positively correlated with both. These findings suggest that trait mindfulness conceptualised as a multi-component construct, but not a uni-component one, is probably an opposing construct to trait mind-wandering. Furthermore, mindfulness and its components, acceptance and non-judging, are associated with a reduction in the more common form of SART errors. However, only the acceptance component made a unique contribution to the variance in TMW and SART performance. Therefore, it is advisable for researchers to specify whether they investigated mindfulness as a uni-component or multi-component construct. Furthermore, it would be beneficial if future research investigates the relationship of mindfulness and its components with mind-wandering further by also incorporating a measure of state mindfulness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36645725
doi: 10.1177/00332941231152391
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

332941231152391

Auteurs

Lakshmi H Somaraju (LH)

School of Psychology, 1319University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Elizabeth C Temple (EC)

School of Psychology, 1319University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Bernadine Cocks (B)

School of Psychology, 1319University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Lewis A Bizo (LA)

School of Psychology, 1319University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Business Justice and Behavioural Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH