Cortical Thickness and Brain Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Aging.
FDG
MRI
brain glucose metabolism
cortical thickness
healthy aging
Journal
Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 1738-6586
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101252374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
10
01
2022
revised:
04
08
2022
accepted:
07
08
2022
pubmed:
18
1
2023
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
17
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to determine the effect of demographic factors on cortical thickness and brain glucose metabolism in healthy aging subjects. The following tests were performed on 71 subjects with normal cognition: neurological examination, 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging, Age was negatively correlated with the mean cortical thickness in all lobes (frontal and parietal lobes, Age and sex affect cortical thickness and brain glucose metabolism in different ways. Demographic factors must therefore be considered in analyses of cortical thickness and brain metabolism.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to determine the effect of demographic factors on cortical thickness and brain glucose metabolism in healthy aging subjects.
METHODS
METHODS
The following tests were performed on 71 subjects with normal cognition: neurological examination, 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging,
RESULTS
RESULTS
Age was negatively correlated with the mean cortical thickness in all lobes (frontal and parietal lobes,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Age and sex affect cortical thickness and brain glucose metabolism in different ways. Demographic factors must therefore be considered in analyses of cortical thickness and brain metabolism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36647225
pii: 19.e2
doi: 10.3988/jcn.2022.0021
pmc: PMC9982173
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
138-146Subventions
Organisme : Eisai Korea
Pays : Korea
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Korean Neurological Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Clin Transl Imaging. 2013 Aug;1(4):
pubmed: 24409422
Clin Transl Imaging. 2015;3(1):13-26
pubmed: 25741488
J Nucl Med. 1995 Jul;36(7):1141-9
pubmed: 7790936
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;221(1):78-85
pubmed: 24262800
Neurosci Res. 2015 May;94:50-61
pubmed: 25557900
Neurobiol Aging. 2018 Dec;72:32-39
pubmed: 30205358
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994 Mar-Apr;18(2):192-205
pubmed: 8126267
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 19;116(8):3251-3255
pubmed: 30718410
Ageing Res Rev. 2016 Sep;30:73-84
pubmed: 26876244
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92
pubmed: 21514248
Neurology. 2017 Jul 4;89(1):88-100
pubmed: 28592453
Lancet. 2015 Oct 24;386(10004):1683-97
pubmed: 26595642
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Oct;21(10):1280-91
pubmed: 12585710
J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(2):221-5
pubmed: 26609179
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Jun 1;306(11):E1315-21
pubmed: 24735889
Brain. 2011 Jun;134(Pt 6):1647-57
pubmed: 21555336
Acta Radiol. 2009 Dec;50(10):1169-74
pubmed: 19922315
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Jun;43:100-17
pubmed: 24726575
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996 May;16(3):385-98
pubmed: 8621743
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1550-60
pubmed: 16945978
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Aug 29;550:189-94
pubmed: 23831346
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991 Mar;11(2):A121-35
pubmed: 1997480
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 May;11(5):494-503.e3
pubmed: 25048578
Neuroimage. 2005 Aug 1;27(1):210-21
pubmed: 15896981
Ann Neurol. 2022 Jun;91(6):853-863
pubmed: 35307860
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116189
pubmed: 31521825
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1490-5
pubmed: 19770055
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Jul;25(7):1071-6
pubmed: 20592901
Neurobiol Aging. 2011 Feb;32(2):200-9
pubmed: 19321233
Arch Neurol. 2003 Jul;60(7):989-94
pubmed: 12873856
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020 Oct 19;12(1):133
pubmed: 33076977
Acta Neuropathol. 1997 Oct;94(4):345-52
pubmed: 9341935
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Apr;27(4):314-24
pubmed: 16124013
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Apr;6(4):305-13
pubmed: 17362834