Prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility: systematic review and meta-analysis.
MRI
MUSA
adenomyosis
endometriosis
fibroid
prevalence
subfertility
transvaginal ultrasound
Journal
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN: 1469-0705
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9108340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
revised:
15
12
2022
received:
30
09
2022
accepted:
23
12
2022
medline:
3
7
2023
pubmed:
18
1
2023
entrez:
17
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Google Scholar, PsycINFO and Web of Science Core Collection from database inception to October 2022. The included studies evaluated the prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility, with or without endometriosis and/or uterine fibroids. Secondary analyses were conducted to identify variation in the prevalence of isolated adenomyosis according to geographical location, diagnostic modality, diagnostic criteria, type of ultrasound, ultrasound features of adenomyosis and the use of assisted reproductive technology. Among 21 longitudinal studies evaluating 25 600 women, the overall pooled prevalence of isolated adenomyosis was 10% (95% CI, 6-15%) (I One in 10 women with subfertility have a diagnosis of isolated adenomyosis. The prevalence of adenomyosis varies according to the presence of concurrent endometriosis and/or fibroids. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-41Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Références
Munro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 629-640.
Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, Gordts S, Guo S-W, Just P-A, Noël J-C, Pistofidis G, Bosch TVd, Petraglia F, Van den Bosch T. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26: 392-411.
Li X, Liu X, Guo SW. Clinical profiles of 710 premenopausal women with adenomyosis who underwent hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 485-494.
Taran FA, Wallwiener M, Kabashi D, Rothmund R, Rall K, Kraemer B, Brucker SY. Clinical characteristics indicating adenomyosis at the time of hysterectomy: a retrospective study in 291 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285: 1571-1576.
Pinzauti S, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Centini G, Orlandini C, Luisi S, Zupi E, Exacoustos C, Petraglia F. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 730-736.
Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB-A): Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 40: 68-81.
Taran FA, Stewart EA, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Phenotype and Surgical and Interventional Alternatives to Hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 2013; 73: 924-931.
de Souza NM, Brosens JJ, Schwieso JE, Paraschos T, Winston RM. The potential value of magnetic resonance imaging in infertility. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 75-79.
Maheshwari A, Gurunath S, Fatima F, Bhattacharya S. Adenomyosis and subfertility: a systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 374-392.
Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet 1995; 346: 558-560.
Barrier BF, Malinowski MJ, Dick EJ, Jr., Hubbard GB, Bates GW. Adenomyosis in the baboon is associated with primary infertility. Fertil Steril 2003; 82 Suppl 3: 1091-1094.
Harada T, Khine YM, Kaponis A, Nikellis T, Decavalas G, Taniguchi F. The Impact of Adenomyosis on Women's Fertility. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2016; 71: 557-568.
Dueholm M. Uterine adenomyosis and infertility, review of reproductive outcome after in-vitro fertilization and surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2017; 96: 715-726.
Hou X, Xing J, Shan H, Mei J, Sun Y, Yan G, Sun H, Wang J. The effect of adenomyosis on IVF after long or ultra-long GnRH agonist treatment. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41: 845-853.
Maubon A, Faury A, Kapella M, Pouquet M, Piver P. Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: a predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2010; 36: 611-618.
Salim R, Riris S, Saab W, Abramov B, Khadum I, Serhal P. Adenomyosis reduces pregnancy rates in infertile women undergoing IVF. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25: 273-277.
Youm HS, Choi YS, Han HD. In-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes in relation to myometrial thickness. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28: 1135-1140.
Stanekova V, Woodman RJ, Tremellen K. The rate of euploid miscarriage is increased in the setting of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Open 2018; 2018: hoy011.
Benaglia L, Cardellicchio L, Leonardi M, Faulisi S, Vercellini P, Paffoni A, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 29: 606-611.
Costello MF, Lindsay K, McNally G. The effect of adenomyosis on in-vitro fertilisation and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 158: 229-234.
Mijatovic V, Florijn E, Halim N, Schats R, Hompes P. Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 151: 62-65.
Neal S, Morin S, Werner M, Gueye NA, Pirtea P, Patounakis G, Scott R Jr, Goodman L. Three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcome following single thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 611-617.
Yan L, Ding L, Tang R, Chen ZJ. Effect of adenomyosis on in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in infertile women: a retrospective cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014; 77: 14-18.
Higgins C, Fernandes H, Costa FD, Martins WP, Vollenhoven B, Healey M. The impact of adenomyosis on IVF outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021: hoab015.
Cozzolino M, Tartaglia S, Pellegrini L, Troiano G, Rizzo G, Petraglia F. The Effect of Uterine Adenomyosis on IVF Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Sci 2022; 29: 3177-3193.
Nirgianakis K, Kalaitzopoulos DR, Schwartz ASK, Spaanderman M, Kramer BW, Mueller MD, Mueller M. Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients with adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 42: 185-206.
Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3432-3439.
Eisenberg VH, Arbib N, Schiff E, Goldenberg M, Seidman DS, Soriano D. Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis Are Prevalent in Women Undergoing Surgery for Endometriosis and May Suggest a Higher Risk of Infertility. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 8967803.
Bromley B, Shipp TD, Benacerraf B. Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 529-534.
Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Rothmund R, Kasperkowiak A, Auwärter G, Ganz A, Kraemer B, Abele H, Schönfisch B, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 288: 1329-1339.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71.
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R, Rienzi L, Sunde A, Schmidt L, Cooke ID, Simpson JL, van der Poel S. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 1786-1801.
Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, Sagoh T, Minami S, Yamashita K. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 171: 531-534.
Sakhel K, Abuhamad A. Sonography of adenomyosis. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 805-808.
Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 337-349.
Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, Glaude Y, Liang L, Seymour RJ. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 199: 151-158.
Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J, Chevallier P. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1206-1213.
Meredith SM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 107.e1-6.
Levy G, Dehaene A, Laurent N, Lernout M, Collinet P, Lucot JP, Lions C, Poncelet E. [Mise au point sur l'adénomyose]. J Radiolo Diagn Inter 2013; 94: 3-25.
Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 76-82.
Dueholm M. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 569-582.
Devlieger R, D'Hooghe T, Timmerman D. Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Hum Reprod Update 2003; 9: 139-147.
Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet M-C, Millischer A-E, Streuli I, Borghese B, Petraglia F, Santulli P. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 1393-1401.
Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 471-474.
Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2018; 109: 389-397.
Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, Uzan S. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2427-2433.
Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA. The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 461-465.
Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installé AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D'Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brölmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 284-298.
Van den Bosch T, de Bruijn AM, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 576-582.
Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Noe M, Kissler S, Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis: prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2309-2316.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Cohort Study Checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/.
Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C, Colpani V, Falavigna M, Aromataris E, Munn Z. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21: 189.
Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 2014; 72: 39.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta-Analysis. In Systematic Reviews in Health Care. 2001; 285-312.
Atabekoğlu CS, Şükür YE, Kalafat E, Özmen B, Berker B, Aytaç R, Sönmezer M. The association between adenomyosis and recurrent miscarriage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 250: 107-111.
Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet L, Millischer AE, Plu Bureau G, Chapron C. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod 2021; 36: 349-357.
Yu O, Schulze-Rath R, Grafton J, Hansen K, Scholes D, Reed SD. Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006-2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223: 94.e1-10.
Loughlin AM, Chiuve SE, Reznor G, Doherty M, Missmer SA, Chomistek AK, Enger C. Method used to identify adenomyosis and potentially undiagnosed adenomyosis in a large, U.S. electronic health record database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2021; 30: 1675-1686.
Orlov S, Jokubkiene L. Prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis at transvaginal ultrasound examination in symptomatic women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2022; 101: 524-531.
Trinchant R, Cruz M, Requena A. Adenomyosis decreases the live birth rate but may not affect perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive cycles. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159: 918-922.
Martínez-Conejero JA, Morgan M, Montesinos M, Fortuño S, Meseguer M, Simón C, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A. Adenomyosis does not affect implantation, but is associated with miscarriage in patients undergoing oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 943-950.
Thalluri V, Tremellen KP, Thalluri V, Tremellen KP. Ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis has a negative impact on successful implantation following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 3487-3492.
Silva V, Ramos FF, Bras AFM, Santos RFS, Xavier M, Miguelote RFO. Junctional Zone in Infertile Women: A Three-dimensional Ultrasound Study. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2020; 42: 152-159.
Puente JM, Fabris A, Patel J, Patel A, Cerrillo M, Requena A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Adenomyosis in infertile women: prevalence and the role of 3D ultrasound as a marker of severity of the disease. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14: 60.
Abu Hashim H, Elaraby S, Fouda AA, El Rakhawy M. The prevalence of adenomyosis in an infertile population: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 40: 842-850.
Rees CO, Rupert IAM, Nederend J, Consten D, Mischi M, H AAMvV, Schoot BC. Women with combined adenomyosis and endometriosis on MRI have worse IVF/ICSI outcomes compared to adenomyosis and endometriosis alone: A matched retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 271: 223-234.
Zhang XP, Zhang YF, Shi R, Zhang YJ, Zhang XL, Hu XM, Hu XY, Hu YJ. Pregnancy outcomes of infertile women with ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis for in-vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 304: 1089-1096.
Sharma S, Bathwal S, Agarwal N, Chattopadhyay R, Saha I, Chakravarty B. Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38: 13-21.
Palihawadana T, Wijesinghe P, Seneviratne H. Aetiology of infertility among females seeking treatment at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Ceylon Med J 2012; 57.
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Hehenkamp WJK, Groenman F, De Bruyn C, Rasmussen C, Lazzeri L, Jokubkiene L, Jurkovic D, Naftalin J, Tellum T, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60: 118-131.
Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine J-M, Uzan S. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2427-2433.
Exacoustos C, Luciano D, Corbett B, De Felice G, Di Feliciantonio M, Luciano A, Zupi E. The uterine junctional zone: a 3-dimensional ultrasound study of patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 248.e-7.
Isaacson K, Loring M. Symptoms of Adenomyosis and Overlapping Diseases. Semin Reprod Med 2020; 38: 144-150.
Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 529-538.