Emulative learning of a two-step task in free-ranging domestic pigs.

Affordance Emulation Ghost control Heterospecific Social learning Sus scrofa

Journal

Animal cognition
ISSN: 1435-9456
Titre abrégé: Anim Cogn
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9814573

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 19 07 2022
accepted: 26 12 2022
revised: 03 12 2022
medline: 4 4 2023
pubmed: 19 1 2023
entrez: 18 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Previous research showed that young domestic pigs learn through observation of conspecifics by using social learning mechanisms like social facilitation, enhancement effects, and even object movement re-enactment. The latter suggests some form of emulative learning in which the observer learns about the object's movements and affordances. As it remains unclear whether pigs need a social agent to learn about objects, we provided 36 free-ranging domestic pigs with varying degrees of social to non-social demonstrations on how to solve a two-step manipulative foraging task: observers watched either a conspecific or a human demonstrator, or self-moving objects ("ghost control"), or a ghost control accompanied by an inactive conspecific bystander. In addition, 22 subjects that were previously tested without any demonstrator were used as a non-observer control. To solve the task, the subjects had to first remove a plug from its recess to then be able to slide a cover to the side, which would lay open a food compartment. Observers interacted longer with the relevant objects (plugs) and were more successful in solving the task compared to non-observers. We found no differences with regard to success between the four observer groups, indicating that the pigs mainly learned about the apparatus rather than about the actions. As the only common feature of the different demonstrations was the movement of the plug and the cover, we conclude the observer pigs learned primarily by emulation, suggesting that social agents are not necessary for pigs when learning through observation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36652043
doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01740-3
pii: 10.1007/s10071-022-01740-3
pmc: PMC10066142
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

929-942

Subventions

Organisme : Austrian Science Fund
ID : W1262-B29

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Aug;30(3):275-81
pubmed: 12391793
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2405-15
pubmed: 19620111
J Comp Psychol. 2023 Feb;137(1):38-44
pubmed: 36931836
Anim Cogn. 2020 Jan;23(1):1-9
pubmed: 31531748
PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10544
pubmed: 20485684
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 22;281(1793):
pubmed: 25185997
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 28;11(10):e0164988
pubmed: 27792731
Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:915
pubmed: 32508719
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 13;8(6):
pubmed: 29899296
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;11(7):
pubmed: 34359267
Behav Processes. 2009 Feb;80(2):109-14
pubmed: 18977419
Am J Primatol. 2006 Dec;68(12):1150-60
pubmed: 16900507
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):645-55
pubmed: 24170136
Integr Org Biol. 2021 Aug 16;3(1):obab023
pubmed: 34409262
PeerJ. 2013 Feb 12;1:e13
pubmed: 23638347
J Comp Psychol. 2003 Dec;117(4):414-9
pubmed: 14717643
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):567-573
pubmed: 27866286
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 08;9(3):
pubmed: 30857185
Physiol Behav. 2020 Sep 1;223:112976
pubmed: 32473157
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Jan;65(1):47-55
pubmed: 21297852
Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):335-53
pubmed: 17024510
C R Biol. 2011 Mar;334(3):171-81
pubmed: 21377611
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Anim Cogn. 2006 Apr;9(2):81-93
pubmed: 16235075
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 08;11(1):
pubmed: 33430048
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):187-201
pubmed: 20845052
Behav Processes. 1997 Sep;40(3):201-7
pubmed: 24895881
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 29;10(2):
pubmed: 32013218
Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;12(18):
pubmed: 36139318
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):917-929
pubmed: 31256339
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):685-701
pubmed: 20128784
Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):4-14
pubmed: 15161136
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):197-205
pubmed: 19588176
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2299-309
pubmed: 19620102
Behav Processes. 1994 Aug;32(2):173-82
pubmed: 24895980
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):701-13
pubmed: 24197275
Science. 2021 Apr 2;372(6537):
pubmed: 33795431
Behav Processes. 1988 Sep;17(3):205-16
pubmed: 24897547
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):121-131
pubmed: 32948970

Auteurs

Ariane Veit (A)

Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria. ariane.veit@vetmeduni.ac.at.

Stefanie Weißhaupt (S)

Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Arnaud Bruat (A)

Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Marianne Wondrak (M)

Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Ludwig Huber (L)

Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH