How health literacy relates to venous leg ulcer healing: A scoping review.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 22 12 2021
accepted: 06 12 2022
entrez: 18 1 2023
pubmed: 19 1 2023
medline: 21 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The level of personal health literacy of patients with venous leg ulcers is likely to affect their ability to self-manage their condition impacting on their adherence to treatment and influences healing and recovery outcomes. To scope existing research that examined the level of health literacy in venous leg ulcer patients, to identify how this may link to self-management behaviours (particularly physical activity and compression adherence), and venous leg ulcer healing outcomes. This scoping review was based on the PRISMA-ScR six-stage framework. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and Health, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for publications examining general and specific health literacy in those with venous leg ulcers and for those examining any potential links of health literacy with self-management/healing generally, published between 2000-2020. This search was guided by a published protocol; studies that described other types of ulcers or did not examine health literacy were excluded. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria the initial search identified 660 articles. We included five articles. Four studies used randomised controlled trials or experimental designs to test the effect of specific health literacy interventions on venous leg ulcer knowledge, compression therapy use, or healing outcomes. One study was a cross- sectional survey with qualitative elements, assessing health literacy in venous leg ulcer patients. Broadly, the research suggested that health literacy was suboptimal amongst those with venous leg ulcers, and health literacy interventions had limited effects on improving key venous leg ulcer specific outcomes. This review provides a synthesis of extant literature examining health literacy in patients with venous leg ulcers. We identified a dearth of literature investigating the value of general and specific health literacy interventions in this space. Most importantly, no recent research on general health literacy and venous leg ulcers was identified, despite strong theoretical utility to do so. The few studies identified largely indicated that targeting health literacy of patients with venous leg ulcers is a viable area of research and intervention, encouraging future researchers and clinicians to consider patient health literacy in venous leg ulcer management.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The level of personal health literacy of patients with venous leg ulcers is likely to affect their ability to self-manage their condition impacting on their adherence to treatment and influences healing and recovery outcomes.
OBJECTIVES
To scope existing research that examined the level of health literacy in venous leg ulcer patients, to identify how this may link to self-management behaviours (particularly physical activity and compression adherence), and venous leg ulcer healing outcomes.
METHODS
This scoping review was based on the PRISMA-ScR six-stage framework. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and Health, Open Grey, and Google Scholar for publications examining general and specific health literacy in those with venous leg ulcers and for those examining any potential links of health literacy with self-management/healing generally, published between 2000-2020. This search was guided by a published protocol; studies that described other types of ulcers or did not examine health literacy were excluded. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria the initial search identified 660 articles.
RESULTS
We included five articles. Four studies used randomised controlled trials or experimental designs to test the effect of specific health literacy interventions on venous leg ulcer knowledge, compression therapy use, or healing outcomes. One study was a cross- sectional survey with qualitative elements, assessing health literacy in venous leg ulcer patients. Broadly, the research suggested that health literacy was suboptimal amongst those with venous leg ulcers, and health literacy interventions had limited effects on improving key venous leg ulcer specific outcomes.
CONCLUSION
This review provides a synthesis of extant literature examining health literacy in patients with venous leg ulcers. We identified a dearth of literature investigating the value of general and specific health literacy interventions in this space. Most importantly, no recent research on general health literacy and venous leg ulcers was identified, despite strong theoretical utility to do so. The few studies identified largely indicated that targeting health literacy of patients with venous leg ulcers is a viable area of research and intervention, encouraging future researchers and clinicians to consider patient health literacy in venous leg ulcer management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36652467
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279368
pii: PONE-D-21-40133
pmc: PMC9847895
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0279368

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Bouguettaya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Res Synth Methods. 2014 Dec;5(4):371-85
pubmed: 26052958
Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):67-9
pubmed: 21331214
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1108-1119
pubmed: 28635188
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jun;63(6):16-28
pubmed: 28657896
J Tissue Viability. 2020 Aug;29(3):176-179
pubmed: 31974010
J Wound Care. 2020 Feb 02;29(2):79-91
pubmed: 32058853
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8
pubmed: 25843827
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 19;17(1):475
pubmed: 28526009
J Wound Care. 2016 Jun;25 Suppl 6:S1-S67
pubmed: 27292202
J Vasc Nurs. 1997 Jun;15(2):73-8
pubmed: 9238945
Int Wound J. 2018 Jun;15(3):441-453
pubmed: 29446252
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):804-818
pubmed: 32150790
J Community Health Nurs. 2000 Spring;17(1):1-13
pubmed: 10778025
J Adv Nurs. 1995 Dec;22(6):1092-100
pubmed: 8675863
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):256-265
pubmed: 30393963
Diabetes Educ. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):857-64
pubmed: 12211925
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2019 Sep;18(3):301-308
pubmed: 31140336
J Adv Nurs. 2011 May;67(5):926-44
pubmed: 21241355
J Wound Care. 2005 Feb;14(2):75-7
pubmed: 15739655
Trials. 2015 Oct 06;16:443
pubmed: 26445318
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 6;10(11):e039894
pubmed: 33158828
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Sep;27(5):562-590
pubmed: 31025794
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 03;12:663570
pubmed: 34149416
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Sep;31(9):1562-1568
pubmed: 28602045
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):1007-1017
pubmed: 30877457
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD000265
pubmed: 23152202
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 26;7:CD013397
pubmed: 34308565
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Feb;30(1):78-88
pubmed: 32839066
J Aging Health. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):33-41
pubmed: 30261796
J Tissue Viability. 2014 Aug;23(3):109-14
pubmed: 24882082
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 05;2018:1036-1045
pubmed: 30815147
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e056790
pubmed: 34992123
J Diabetes. 2011 Jun;3(2):138-46
pubmed: 21599867
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Jul;28(4):553-560
pubmed: 32306490
Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1252-1262
pubmed: 31418532
Geriatr Nurs. 2017 Jul - Aug;38(4):334-341
pubmed: 28089217
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103774
pubmed: 33080480
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Feb;150(2):267-73
pubmed: 14996097
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;41(6):556-9
pubmed: 25377105
BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e044604
pubmed: 33980525
J Clin Nurs. 2010 May;19(9-10):1289-97
pubmed: 20500338
Health Promot Int. 2019 Oct 1;34(5):e1-e17
pubmed: 30107564
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(5):303-5
pubmed: 19641847
Comput Inform Nurs. 2013 Nov;31(11):547-53
pubmed: 23974574
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Aug;63(8):30-43
pubmed: 28873064

Auteurs

Ayoub Bouguettaya (A)

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Georgina Gethin (G)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Sebastian Probst (S)

School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Care Directorate, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Jane Sixsmith (J)

School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Victoria Team (V)

Wound Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Carolina Weller (C)

Wound Research Group, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH