False alarms and information transmission in grouping animals.
alarm
false alarm
group behaviour
information transmission
predator-prey
social information
vigilance
Journal
Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
ISSN: 1469-185X
Titre abrégé: Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0414576
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
revised:
01
01
2023
received:
03
10
2022
accepted:
04
01
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
19
1
2023
entrez:
18
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A key benefit of grouping in prey species is access to social information, including information about the presence of predators. Larger groups of prey animals respond both sooner and at greater distances from predators, increasing the likelihood that group members will successfully avoid capture. However, identifying predators in complex environments is a difficult task, and false alarms (alarm behaviours without genuine threat) appear surprisingly frequent across a range of taxa including insects, amphibians, fish, mammals, and birds. In some bird flocks, false alarms have been recorded to substantially outnumber true alarms. False alarms can be costly in terms of both the energetic costs of producing alarm behaviours as well as lost opportunity costs (e.g. abandoning a feeding patch which was in fact safe, losing sleep if an animal is resting/roosting, or losing mating opportunities). Models have shown that false alarms may be a substantial but underappreciated cost of group living, introducing an inherent risk to using social information and a vulnerability to the propagation of false information. This review will focus on false alarms, introducing a two-stage framework to categorise the different factors hypothesised to influence the propensity of animal groups to produce false alarms. A number of factors may affect false alarm rate, and this new framework splits these factors into two core processing stages: (i) individual perception and response; and (ii) group processing of predator information. In the first stage, individuals in the group monitor the environment for predator cues and respond. The factors highlighted in this stage influence the likelihood that an individual will misclassify stimuli and produce a false alarm (e.g. lower light levels can make predator identification more difficult and false alarms more common). In the second stage, alarm information from individuals is processed by the group. The factors highlighted in this stage influence the likelihood of alarm information being copied by group members and propagated through the group (e.g. some animals implement group processing mechanisms that regulate the spread of behavioural responses such as consensus decision making through the quorum response). This review follows the structure of this new framework, focussing on the causes of false alarms, factors that influence false alarm rate, the transmission of alarm information through animal groups, mechanisms to mitigate the spread of false alarms, and the consequences of false alarms.
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
833-848Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Références
Attwell, J. R., Ioannou, C. C., Reid, C. R. & Herbert-Read, J. E. (2021). Fish avoid visually noisy environments where prey targeting is reduced. The American Naturalist 198(3), 421-432.
Barbosa, A. (2002). Does vigilance always covary negatively with group size? Effects of foraging strategy. Acta Ethologica 5, 51-55.
Beauchamp, G. (2008). What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? Behavioral Ecology 19(6), 1361-1368.
Beauchamp, G. (2010). Determinants of false alarms in staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers. Behavioral Ecology 21, 584-587.
Beauchamp, G., Li, Z., Yu, C., Bednekoff, P. A. & Blumstein, D. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of the group-size effect on vigilance in mammals. Behavioral Ecology 32(5), 919-925.
Beauchamp, G. & Ruxton, G. D. (2007). False alarms and the evolution of antipredator vigilance. Animal Behaviour 74, 1199-1206.
Bernal, X. E., Rand, A. S. & Ryan, M. J. (2009). Task differences confound sex differences in receiver permissiveness in tngara frogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 1323-1329.
Blumstein, D. T., Verneyre, L. & Daniel, J. C. (2004). Reliability and the adaptive utility of discrimination among alarm callers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271, 1851-1857.
Boland, C. R. J. (2003). An experimental test of predator detection rates using groups of free-living emus. Ethology 109, 209-222.
Boujja-Miljour, H., Leighton, P. A. & Beauchamp, G. (2017). Spread of false alarms in foraging flocks of house sparrows. Ethology 123(8), 526-531.
Bro-Jørgensen, J. & Pangle, W. M. (2010). Male topi antelopes alarm snort deceptively to retain females for mating. American Naturalist 176, E33-E39.
Caro, T. M., Lombardo, L., Goldizen, A. W. & Kelly, M. (1995). Tail-flagging and other antipredator signals in white-tailed deer: new data and synthesis. Behavioral Ecology 6, 442-450.
Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. (1988). Assessment of meaning and the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour 36, 477-486.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 975-979.
Collins, L. M. & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2007). The feeding dynamics of broiler chickens. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4, 65-72.
Cresswell, W., Hilton, G. M. & Ruxton, G. D. (2000). Evidence for a rule governing the avoidance of superfluous escape flights. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267, 733-737.
Croy, M. I. & Hughes, R. N. (1991). Effects of food supply, hunger, danger and competition on choice of foraging location by the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia. Animal Behaviour 42, 131-139.
Cvikel, N., Egert Berg, K., Levin, E., Hurme, E., Borissov, I., Boonman, A., Amichai, E. & Yovel, Y. (2015). Bats aggregate to improve prey search but might be impaired when their density becomes too high. Current Biology 25, 206-211.
Dall, S. R. X., Giraldeau, L. A., Olsson, O., McNamara, J. M. & Stephens, D. W. (2005). Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20, 187-193.
Davis, J. M. (1975). Socially induced flight reactions in pigeons. Animal Behaviour 23, 597-601.
Elgar, M. A. (1989). Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews 64, 13-33.
Elgar, M. A. & Catterall, C. P. (1981). Flocking and predator surveillance in house sparrows: test of a hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 29, 868-872.
Evans, R. M. (1982). Foraging-flock recruitment at a black-billed gull colony: implications for the information center hypothesis. Auk 99, 24-30.
Fahimipour, A. K., Gil, M. A., Celis, M. R., Hein, G. F., Martin, B. T., Hein, A. M. (2022). Wild animals suppress the spread of socially-transmitted misinformation. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.23.505022
Flower, T. P. (2011). Fork-tailed drongos use deceptive mimicked alarm calls to steal food. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, 1548-1555.
Flower, T. P., Gribble, M. & Ridley, A. R. (2014). Deception by flexible alarm mimicry in an African bird. Science 344, 513-516.
Freeberg, T. M. & Lucas, J. R. (2002). Receivers respond differently to chick-a-dee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees, Poecile carolinensis. Animal Behaviour 63, 837-845.
Fuiman, L. A. (1993). Development of predator evasion in Atlantic herring, Clupea harengus L. Animal Behaviour 45, 1101-1116.
Giardina, I. (2008). Collective behavior in animal groups: theoretical models and empirical studies. HFSP Journal 2, 205-219.
Giraldeau, L. A., Valone, T. J. & Templeton, J. J. (2002). Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 357, 1559-1566.
Godin, J. G. J. & Morgan, M. J. (1985). Predator avoidance and school size in a cyprinodontid fish, the banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus Lesueur). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16, 105-110.
Haftorn, S. (2000). Contexts and possible functions of alarm calling in the willow tit, Parus montanus; the principle of “better safe than sorry”. Behaviour 137(4), 437-449.
Hamel, J. A. & Cocroft, R. B. (2012). Negative feedback from maternal signals reduces false alarms by collectively signalling offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 3820-3826.
Hare, J. F. & Atkins, B. A. (2001). The squirrel that cried wolf: reliability detection by juvenile Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 108-112.
Herbert-Read, J. E., Buhl, J., Hu, F., Ward, A. J. W. & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2011). Initiation and spread of escape waves within animal groups. Royal Society Open Science 2, 140355.
Heyes, C. M. (1994). Social learning in animals: categories and mechanisms. Biological Reviews 69(2), 207-231.
Hilton, G. M., Ruxton, G. D. & Cresswell, W. (1999). Choice of foraging area with respect to predation risk in redshanks: the effects of weather and predator activity. Oikos 87(2), 295-302.
Hoogland, J. L. (1981). The evolution of coloniality in white-tailed and black-tailed prairie dogs (Sciuridae: Cynomys leucurus and C. ludovicianus). Ecology 62, 252-272.
Hoppitt, W. & Laland, K. N. (2008). Social processes influencing learning in animals: a review of the evidence. Advances in the Study of Behavior 38, 105-165.
Hulse, S. H. (2002). Auditory scene analysis in animal communication. Advances in the Study of Behavior 31, 163-200.
Ings, T. C. & Chittka, L. (2008). Speed-accuracy tradeoffs and false alarms in bee responses to cryptic predators. Current Biology 18, 1520-1524.
Ioannou, C. C., Rocque, F., Herbert-Read, J. E., Duffield, C. & Firth, J. A. (2019). Predators attacking virtual prey reveal the costs and benefits of leadership. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(18), 8925-8930.
Johnson, D. D. P., Blumstein, D. T., Fowler, J. H. & Haselton, M. G. (2013). The evolution of error: error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28, 474-481.
Kahlert, J. (2006). Factors affecting escape behaviour in moulting Greylag Geese Anser answer. Journal of Ornithology 147, 569-577.
Krause, J. (1994). Differential fitness returns in relation to spatial position in groups. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 69(2), 187-206.
Laland, K. N. & Williams, K. (1998). Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy. Behavioral Ecology 9, 493-499.
Lambert, P. J., Herbert-Read, J. E. & Ioannou, C. C. (2021). The measure of spatial position within groups that best predicts predation risk depends on group movement. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 288(1959), 20211286.
Lazarus, J. (1979). The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive quelea. Animal Behaviour 27, 855-865.
Lima, S. L. (1994). Collective detection of predatory attack by birds in the absence of alarm signals. Journal of Avian Biology 25(4), 319-326.
Lima, S. L. (1995). Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect. Animal Behaviour 49, 11-20.
Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. (1990). Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619-640.
Lindström, Å. (1989). Finch flock size and risk of hawk predation at a migratory stopover site. Auk 106, 225-232.
Martín, J., López, P. & Cooper, W. E. (2003). Loss of mating opportunities influences refuge use in the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54(5), 505-510.
McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. (1992). Evolutionarily stable levels of vigilance as a function of group size. Animal Behaviour 43, 641-658.
Metcalfe, N. B. (1984). The effects of mixed-species flocking on the vigilance of shorebirds: who do they trust? Animal Behaviour 32, 986-993.
Møller, A. P. (1988). False alarm calls as a means of resource usurpation in the great tit Parus major. Ethology 79, 25-30.
Munn, C. A. (1986). Birds that ‘cry wolf’. Nature 319, 143-145.
Nakano, R., Nakagawa, R., Tokimoto, N. & Okanoya, K. (2013). Alarm call discrimination in a social rodent: adult but not juvenile degu calls induce high vigilance. Journal of Ethology 31, 115-121.
Ohguchi, O. (1981). Prey density and selection against oddity by three-spined sticklebacks. In Advances in Ethology, Supplements to Journal of Comparative Ethology. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin/Hamburg.
Parrish, J. K., Viscido, S. V. & Grünbaum, D. (2002). Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent properties. The Biological Bulletin 202, 296-305.
Pembury Smith, M. Q. R. & Ruxton, G. D. (2020). Camouflage in predators. Biological Reviews 95, 1325-1340.
Pitcher, T. J., Magurran, A. E. & Winfield, I. J. (1982). Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10, 149-151.
Pratt, S. C. (2005). Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology 16, 488-496.
Pulliam, H. R. (1973). On the advantages of flocking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38, 419-422.
Pulliam, H. R., Pyke, G. H. & Caraco, T. (1982). The scanning behavior of juncos: a game-theoretical approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 95, 89-103.
Radakov, D. V. (1973). Schooling in the Ecology of Fish. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Regnier, F. E. & Wilson, E. O. (1971). Chemical communication and “propaganda” in slave-maker ants. Science 172, 267-269.
Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Computers and Graphics 21, 25-34.
Roberts, G. (1996). Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Animal Behaviour 51(5), 1077-1086.
Römer, H. & Holderied, M. (2020). Decision making in the face of a deadly predator: high-amplitude behavioural thresholds can be adaptive for rainforest crickets under high background noise levels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375, 20190471.
Root-Bernstein, M. (2021). Why do birds false alarm flight? Birds 3, 29-37.
Rosenthal, S. B., Twomey, C. R., Hartnett, A. T., Wu, H. S. & Couzin, I. D. (2015). Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 4690-4695.
Rutz, C. (2012). Predator fitness increases with selectivity for odd prey. Current Biology 22(9), 820-824.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1972). Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running. Science 177, 222-228.
Searcy, W. A. & Brenowitz, E. A. (1988). Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332, 152-154.
Seeley, T. D. & Visscher, P. K. (2004). Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie 35, 101-116.
Shettleworth, S. J. (2010). Cognition, Evolution, and Behaviour. Oxford University Press, New York.
Siegfried, W. R. & Underhill, L. G. (1975). Flocking as an anti-predator strategy in doves. Animal Behaviour 23, 504-508.
Silvestri, A., Morgan, K. & Ridley, A. R. (2019). The association between evidence of a predator threat and responsiveness to alarm calls in Western Australian magpies (Cracticus tibicen dorsalis). PeerJ 7, e7572.
Simpson, S. D., Purser, J. & Radford, A. N. (2014). Anthropogenic noise compromises antipredator behaviour in European eels. Global Change Biology 21(2), 586-593.
Sosna, M. M. G., Twomey, C. R., Bak-Coleman, J., Poel, W., Daniels, B. C., Romanczuk, P. & Couzin, I. D. (2019). Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 20556-20561.
Stahlman, W. D., Chan, A. A. Y., Blumstein, D. T., Fast, C. D. & Blaisdell, A. P. (2011). Auditory stimulation dishabituates anti-predator escape behavior in hermit crabs (Coenobita clypeatus). Behavioural Processes 88(1), 7-11.
Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J. L. & Petit, O. (2011). From the first intention movement to the last joiner: macaques combine mimetic rules to optimize their collective decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, 1697-1704.
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2005). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, 5-22.
Sumpter, D. J. T. & Pratt, S. C. (2009). Quorum responses and consensus decision making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 743-753.
Tamura, N. (1995). Postcopulatory mate guarding by vocalization in the Formosan squirrel. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36, 377-386.
Templeton, C. N., Zollinger, S. A. & Brumm, H. (2016). Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls. Current Biology 26, R1173-R1174.
Templeton, J. J. & Giraldeau, L. A. (1996). Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38, 105-114.
Thiebault, A., Mullers, R. H., Pistorius, P. A. & Tremblay, Y. (2014). Local enhancement in a seabird: reaction distances and foraging consequence of predator aggregations. Behavioral Ecology 25(6), 1302-1310.
Trail, P. W. (1987). Predation and antipredator behavior at Guianan cock-of-the-rock leks. Auk 104, 496-507.
Treherne, J. E. & Foster, W. A. (1981). Group transmission of predator avoidance behaviour in a marine insect: the trafalgar effect. Animal Behaviour 29, 911-917.
Turner, G. F. & Pitcher, T. J. (1986). Attack abatement: a model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. The American Naturalist 128(2), 228-240.
Ward, A. & Webster, M. (2016). Sociality: The Behaviour of Group-Living Animals. Springer International Publishing, New York.
Ward, A. J. W., Herbert-Read, J. E., Sumpter, D. J. T. & Krause, J. (2011). Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2312-2315.
Ward, A. J. W., Sumpter, D. J. T., Couzin, I. D., Hart, P. J. B. & Krause, J. (2008). Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 6948-6953.
Warkentin, K. M., Jung, J., Rueda Solano, L. A. & McDaniel, J. G. (2019). Ontogeny of escape-hatching decisions: vibrational cue use changes as predicted from costs of sampling and false alarms. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73, 51.
Webster, M. M., Chouinard-Thuly, L., Herczeg, G., Kitano, J., Riley, R., Rogers, S., Shapiro, M. D., Shikano, T. & Laland, K. N. (2019). A four-questions perspective on public information use in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae). Royal Society Open Science 6(2), 181735.
Webster, M. M. & Hart, P. J. B. (2006). Subhabitat selection by foraging threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): previous experience and social conformity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 60, 77-86.
Webster, M. M. & Laland, K. N. (2015). Public information use by foraging ninespine sticklebacks: social learning or an unlearned social influence on travel direction? Behaviour 152, 1569-1584.
Wheeler, B. C. (2009). Monkeys crying wolf? Tufted capuchin monkeys use anti-predator calls to usurp resources from conspecifics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, 3013-3018.
Whitfield, D. P. (1985). Raptor predation on wintering waders in southeast Scotland. Ibis 127, 544-558.
Wiley, R. H. (2006). Signal detection and animal communication. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 36, 217-247.
Winter, Y. & Von Helversen, O. (1998). The energy cost of flight: do small bats fly more cheaply than birds? Journal of Comparative Physiology B 168, 105-111.
Zhou, Y., Radford, A. N. & Magrath, R. D. (2019). Why does noise reduce response to alarm calls? Experimental assessment of masking, distraction and greater vigilance in wild birds. Functional Ecology 33, 1280-1289.