Lifestyle-, environmental-, and additional health factors associated with an increased sperm DNA fragmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
DFI
DNA fragmentation index
Infertility
Male fertility
Prognostic factors
Reproductive medicine
SDF
Sperm DNA fragmentation
Sperm quality
Journal
Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E
ISSN: 1477-7827
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jan 2023
18 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
18
11
2022
accepted:
02
01
2023
entrez:
18
1
2023
pubmed:
19
1
2023
medline:
21
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Infertility affects one in every six couples in developed countries, and approximately 50% is of male origin. In 2021, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) testing became an evidence-based test for fertility evaluations depicting fertility more clearly than standard semen parameters. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the potential prognostic factors of a higher SDF. We conducted a systematic search in three medical databases and included studies investigating any risk factors for SDF values. We calculated mean differences (MD) in SDF with 95% confidence interval (CI) for exposed and non-exposed individuals. We included 190 studies in our analysis. In the group of associated health conditions, varicocele (MD = 13.62%, CI: 9.39-17.84) and impaired glucose tolerance (MD = 13.75%, CI: 6.99-20.51) had the most significant increase in SDF. Among malignancies, testicular tumors had the highest impact, with a maximum of MD = 11.3% (CI: 7.84-14.76). Among infections, the overall effects of both Chlamydia and HPV were negligible. Of lifestyle factors, smoking had the most disruptive effect on SDF - an increase of 9.19% (CI: 4.33-14.06). Different periods of sexual abstinence did not show significant variations in SDF values. Age seemed to have a more drastic effect on SDF from age 50 onwards, with a mean difference of 12.58% (CI: 7.31-17.86). Pollution also had a detrimental effect - 9.68% (CI: 6.85-12.52). Of the above risk factors, varicocele, impaired glucose tolerance, testicular tumors, smoking, pollution, and paternal age of over 50 were associated with the highest SDF. CRD42021282533.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36653793
doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01054-0
pii: 10.1186/s12958-023-01054-0
pmc: PMC9847125
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5Subventions
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Organisme : Semmelweis Egyetem
ID : Not applicable
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Sep;25(3):307-14
pubmed: 22809864
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019 Jun;70(3):
pubmed: 31539881
Fertil Steril. 2002 May;77(5):873-82
pubmed: 12009338
Nutr Rev. 2016 Feb;74(2):118-30
pubmed: 26705308
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Sep;37(3):315-326
pubmed: 30314886
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):174-9
pubmed: 16921163
Andrology. 2015 Mar;3(2):265-70
pubmed: 25598385
World J Mens Health. 2022 Jan;40(1):104-115
pubmed: 33987998
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(4):229-35
pubmed: 21160151
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Feb;35(2):213-220
pubmed: 29143943
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Nov;31(5):593-604
pubmed: 26380863
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;927:147-64
pubmed: 22992911
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Dec;2(6):432-6
pubmed: 12084227
Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep;108(3):393-406
pubmed: 28760517
Ageing Res Rev. 2015 Jan;19:22-33
pubmed: 25462195
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Reprod Infertil. 2021 Apr-Jun;22(2):75-76
pubmed: 34041002
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 26;:101740
pubmed: 32348878
Fertil Steril. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):1027-36
pubmed: 20080235
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Cytokine. 2020 Jan;125:154861
pubmed: 31569012
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;286(1):217-29
pubmed: 22392488
Fertil Steril. 2022 Feb;117(2):246-251
pubmed: 34986984
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):43-50
pubmed: 10632410
Arab J Urol. 2018 Feb 13;16(1):10-20
pubmed: 29713532
J BUON. 2017 Jul-Aug;22(4):844-852
pubmed: 29155509
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1994-2001
pubmed: 29620997
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):603-620
pubmed: 34511305
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;28(3):164-71
pubmed: 27054510
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Mar;44(3):549-558
pubmed: 31949297
Hum Reprod. 2019 Oct 2;34(10):1915-1923
pubmed: 31585464
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1317-1319
pubmed: 34312557
Hum Reprod Update. 2003 Jul-Aug;9(4):331-45
pubmed: 12926527
Lancet. 2021 Jan 23;397(10271):319-333
pubmed: 33308486
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Feb 18;14:25
pubmed: 24548571
Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):188-96
pubmed: 16966350
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Apr 28;17(1):85-89
pubmed: 31110383
Basic Clin Androl. 2020 Sep 10;30:15
pubmed: 32944248
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):273-280
pubmed: 34759617
Andrologia. 2021 Feb;53(1):e13885
pubmed: 33118219
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):280-6
pubmed: 23420236
Andrology. 2021 Mar;9(2):478-502
pubmed: 33220146