Factors Influencing Continued Wearable Device Use in Older Adult Populations: Quantitative Study.
mobile phone
older adults
remote sensing
sensor systems
usability
wearable device
Journal
JMIR aging
ISSN: 2561-7605
Titre abrégé: JMIR Aging
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101740387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jan 2023
19 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
26
01
2022
accepted:
27
10
2022
revised:
09
05
2022
entrez:
19
1
2023
pubmed:
20
1
2023
medline:
20
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The increased use of wearable sensor technology has highlighted the potential for remote telehealth services such as rehabilitation. Telehealth services incorporating wearable sensors are most likely to appeal to the older adult population in remote and rural areas, who may struggle with long commutes to clinics. However, the usability of such systems often discourages patients from adopting these services. This study aimed to understand the usability factors that most influence whether an older adult will decide to continue using a wearable device. Older adults across 4 different regions (Northern Ireland, Ireland, Sweden, and Finland) wore an activity tracker for 7 days under a free-living environment protocol. In total, 4 surveys were administered, and biometrics were measured by the researchers before the trial began. At the end of the trial period, the researchers administered 2 further surveys to gain insights into the perceived usability of the wearable device. These were the standardized System Usability Scale (SUS) and a custom usability questionnaire designed by the research team. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the key factors that affect participants' intention to continue using the wearable device in the future. Machine learning classifiers were used to provide an early prediction of the intention to continue using the wearable device. The study was conducted with older adult volunteers (N=65; mean age 70.52, SD 5.65 years) wearing a Xiaomi Mi Band 3 activity tracker for 7 days in a free-living environment. The results from the SUS survey showed no notable difference in perceived system usability regardless of region, sex, or age, eliminating the notion that usability perception differs based on geographical location, sex, or deviation in participants' age. There was also no statistically significant difference in SUS score between participants who had previously owned a wearable device and those who wore 1 or 2 devices during the trial. The bespoke usability questionnaire determined that the 2 most important factors that influenced an intention to continue device use in an older adult cohort were device comfort (τ=0.34) and whether the device was fit for purpose (τ=0.34). A computational model providing an early identifier of intention to continue device use was developed using these 2 features. Random forest classifiers were shown to provide the highest predictive performance (80% accuracy). After including the top 8 ranked questions from the bespoke questionnaire as features of our model, the accuracy increased to 88%. This study concludes that comfort and accuracy are the 2 main influencing factors in sustaining wearable device use. This study suggests that the reported factors influencing usability are transferable to other wearable sensor systems. Future work will aim to test this hypothesis using the same methodology on a cohort using other wearable technologies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The increased use of wearable sensor technology has highlighted the potential for remote telehealth services such as rehabilitation. Telehealth services incorporating wearable sensors are most likely to appeal to the older adult population in remote and rural areas, who may struggle with long commutes to clinics. However, the usability of such systems often discourages patients from adopting these services.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to understand the usability factors that most influence whether an older adult will decide to continue using a wearable device.
METHODS
METHODS
Older adults across 4 different regions (Northern Ireland, Ireland, Sweden, and Finland) wore an activity tracker for 7 days under a free-living environment protocol. In total, 4 surveys were administered, and biometrics were measured by the researchers before the trial began. At the end of the trial period, the researchers administered 2 further surveys to gain insights into the perceived usability of the wearable device. These were the standardized System Usability Scale (SUS) and a custom usability questionnaire designed by the research team. Statistical analyses were performed to identify the key factors that affect participants' intention to continue using the wearable device in the future. Machine learning classifiers were used to provide an early prediction of the intention to continue using the wearable device.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study was conducted with older adult volunteers (N=65; mean age 70.52, SD 5.65 years) wearing a Xiaomi Mi Band 3 activity tracker for 7 days in a free-living environment. The results from the SUS survey showed no notable difference in perceived system usability regardless of region, sex, or age, eliminating the notion that usability perception differs based on geographical location, sex, or deviation in participants' age. There was also no statistically significant difference in SUS score between participants who had previously owned a wearable device and those who wore 1 or 2 devices during the trial. The bespoke usability questionnaire determined that the 2 most important factors that influenced an intention to continue device use in an older adult cohort were device comfort (τ=0.34) and whether the device was fit for purpose (τ=0.34). A computational model providing an early identifier of intention to continue device use was developed using these 2 features. Random forest classifiers were shown to provide the highest predictive performance (80% accuracy). After including the top 8 ranked questions from the bespoke questionnaire as features of our model, the accuracy increased to 88%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study concludes that comfort and accuracy are the 2 main influencing factors in sustaining wearable device use. This study suggests that the reported factors influencing usability are transferable to other wearable sensor systems. Future work will aim to test this hypothesis using the same methodology on a cohort using other wearable technologies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36656636
pii: v6i1e36807
doi: 10.2196/36807
pmc: PMC9947821
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e36807Informations de copyright
©Karla Muñoz Esquivel, James Gillespie, Daniel Kelly, Joan Condell, Richard Davies, Catherine McHugh, William Duffy, Elina Nevala, Antti Alamäki, Juha Jalovaara, Salvatore Tedesco, John Barton, Suzanne Timmons, Anna Nordström. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 19.01.2023.
Références
J Appl Gerontol. 2018 Feb;37(2):131-156
pubmed: 27255686
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:162-169
pubmed: 30509522
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2013 Sep;57(1):1683-1687
pubmed: 31263349
J Med Syst. 2019 Jun 15;43(8):233
pubmed: 31203472
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):e15704
pubmed: 32310149
Inform Health Soc Care. 2010 Sep-Dec;35(3-4):177-87
pubmed: 21133771
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Sep 25;6:259
pubmed: 25309436
Int J Telerehabil. 2014 Sep 03;6(1):29-35
pubmed: 25945220
Age Ageing. 2001 Jul;30(4):337-43
pubmed: 11509313
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;21(13):
pubmed: 34203571
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Jun;26(6):769-775
pubmed: 31553281
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:77-87
pubmed: 29866329
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun;46(2):239-48
pubmed: 20485226
Age Ageing. 2017 Jan 20;46(1):71-77
pubmed: 28181637
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Nov 15;5(11):e173
pubmed: 29141837
Gerontechnology. 2018 Sep;17(3):151-159
pubmed: 30631251
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):190-4
pubmed: 21339305