Relationship Between the Number of Repetitions in Reserve and Lifting Velocity During the Prone Bench Pull Exercise: An Alternative Approach to Control Proximity-to-Failure.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
21
1
2023
entrez:
20
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pérez-Castilla, A, Miras-Moreno, S, Weakley, J, and García-Ramos, A. Relationship between the number of repetitions in reserve and lifting velocity during the prone bench pull exercise: an alternative approach to control proximity-to-failure. J Strength Cond Res 37(8): 1551-1558, 2023-This study aimed to explore the goodness-of-fit and accuracy of both general and individual relationships between the number of repetitions in reserve (RIR) and the repetition velocity during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise. Fifteen male sports science students completed 3 sessions separated by 48-72 hours. The first session was used to determine the bench pull 1 repetition maximum (1RM). The second and third sessions were identical and consisted of 3 single sets (60, 70, and 80% 1RM) of repetitions to momentary muscular failure separated by 10 minutes during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise. General (i.e., pooling together the data from the 15 subjects) and individual RIR-velocity relationships were constructed from the data collected in the second session by pooling the data from the 3 loads (multiple-loads) or specifically for each load (load-specific). The 4 RIR-velocity relationship models were ranked by their goodness-of-fit as follows: individual load-specific ( r = 0.93) > individual multiple-loads ( r = 0.83) > general multiple-loads ( r = 0.65) > general load-specific ( r = 0.61). The accuracy when predicting the RIR in the third session based on the RIR-velocity equations obtained in the second session was acceptable and comparable for the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models (absolute errors ≤2 RIR). However, the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models significantly underestimated the RIR for ≥1 RIR and overestimated the RIR for 0 RIR. These results suggest that the 4 RIR-velocity relationship models are equally effective to quantify proximity-to-failure during the Smith machine prone bench pull exercise.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36662153
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004448
pii: 00124278-202308000-00001
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1551-1558Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: A review of the acute programme variables. Sports Med 35: 841–851, 2005.
Carroll KM, Bernards JR, Bazyler CD, et al. Divergent performance outcomes following resistance training using repetition maximums or relative intensity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 14: 46–54, 2019.
Drinkwater EJ, Lawton TW, Lindsell RP, et al. Training leading to repetition failure enhances bench press strength gains in elite junior athletes. J Strength Cond Res 19: 382, 2005.
García-Ramos A, Barboza-González P, Ulloa-Díaz D, et al. Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise. J Sports Sci 37: 2205–2212, 2019.
García-Ramos A, Torrejón A, Feriche B, et al. Prediction of the maximum number of repetitions and repetitions in reserve from barbell velocity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 353–359, 2018.
Garcia-Ramos A, Ulloa-Diaz D, Barboza-Gonzalez P, et al. Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models. PLoS One 14: e0212085, 2019.
García-Ramos A, Weakley J, Janicijevic D, Jukic I. Number of repetitions performed before and after reaching velocity loss thresholds: First repetition versus fastest repetition—Mean velocity versus peak velocity. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16: 950–957, 2021.
Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Davies TB, et al. Effect of resistance training frequency on gains in muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 48: 1207–1220, 2018.
Halperin I, Malleron T, Har-Nir I, et al. Accuracy in predicting repetitions to task failure in resistance exercise: A scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis. Sports Med 52: 377–390, 2022.
Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41: 3–12, 2009.
Izquierdo M, González-Badillo J, Häkkinen K, et al. Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions. Int J Sports Med 27: 718–724, 2006.
Jiménez-Alonso A, García-Ramos A, Cepero M, et al. Velocity performance feedback during the free-weight bench press testing procedure: An effective strategy to increase the reliability and one repetition maximum accuracy prediction. J Strength Cond Res 36: 1077–1083, 2022.
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36: 674–688, 2004.
Mansfield SK, Peiffer JJ, Hughes LJ, Scott BR. Estimating repetitions in reserve for resistance exercise: An analysis of factors which impact on prediction accuracy. J Strength Cond Res 2020. Online Ahead of Print.
Martorelli S, Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, et al. Strength training with repetitions to failure does not provide additional strength and muscle hypertrophy gains in young women. Eur J Transl Myol 27: 6339, 2017.
Miras-Moreno S, Pérez-Castilla A, García-Ramos A. Lifting velocity as a predictor of the maximum number of repetitions that can be performed to failure during the prone bench pull exercise. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 17: 1213–1221, 2022.
Morán-Navarro R, Martínez-Cava A, Sánchez-Medina L, et al. Movement velocity as a measure of level of effort during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1496–1504, 2019.
Pareja-Blanco F, Alcazar J, Sánchez-ValdepeÑas J, et al. Velocity loss as a critical variable determining the adaptations to strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 52: 1752–1762, 2020.
Pelland JC, Robinson ZP, Remmert JF, et al. Methods for controlling and reporting resistance training proximity to failure: Current issues and future directions. Sports Med 52: 1461–1472, 2022.
Perez-Castilla A, Garcia-Ramos A, Padial P, et al. Effect of different velocity loss thresholds during a power-oriented resistance training program on the mechanical capacities of lower-body muscles. J Sports Sci 36: 1331–1339, 2018.
Pérez-Castilla A, Jukic I, Haff GG, García-Ramos A. The bench press grip width does not affect the number of repetitions performed at different velocity loss thresholds. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 1057, 2021.
Pérez-Castilla A, Miras-Moreno S, Janicijevic D, García-Ramos A. Velocity loss is not an accurate predictor of the percentage of completed repetitions during the prone bench pull exercise. J Strength Cond Res 37: 1001–1008, 2023.
Pérez-Castilla A, Piepoli A, Delgado-García G, Garrido-Blanca G, García-Ramos A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1258–1265, 2019.
Ralston GW, Kilgore L, Wyatt FB, Baker JS. The effect of weekly set volume on strength gain: A meta-analysis. Sports Med 47: 2585–2601, 2017.
Refalo MC, Helms ER, Hamilton DL, Fyfe JJ. Towards an improved understanding of proximity-to-failure in resistance training and its influence on skeletal muscle hypertrophy, neuromuscular fatigue, muscle damage, and perceived discomfort: A scoping review. J Sports Sci 40: 1369–1391, 2022.
Sánchez-Moreno M, Rendeiro-Pinho G, Mil-Homens PV, Pareja-Blanco F. Monitoring training volume through maximal number of repetitions or velocity-based approach. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16: 527–534, 2021.
Santos WDND, Vieira CA, Bottaro M, et al. Resistance training performed to failure or not to failure results in similar total volume, but with different fatigue and discomfort levels. J Strength Cond Res 35: 1372–1379, 2021.
Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 35: 1073–1082, 2017.
Weakley J, Mann B, Banyard H, et al. Velocity-based training: From theory to application. Strength Cond J 43: 31–49, 2021.
Weakley J, McLaren S, Ramirez-Lopez C, et al. Application of velocity loss thresholds during free-weight resistance training: Responses and reproducibility of perceptual, metabolic, and neuromuscular outcomes. J Sports Sci 38: 477–485, 2020.
Weakley J, Ramirez-Lopez C, McLaren S, et al. The effects of 10%, 20%, and 30% velocity loss thresholds on kinetic, kinematic, and repetition characteristics during the barbell back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 15: 180–188, 2020.
Zourdos MC, Klemp A, Dolan C, et al. Novel resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion scale measuring repetitions in reserve. J Strength Cond Res 30: 267–275, 2016.