Prognosis of Primary Papillary Ta Grade 3 Bladder Cancer in the Non-muscle-invasive Spectrum.

Bladder Cancer Carcinomas G3 Grade Non–muscle-invasive Stage Ta Urothelial World Health Organization

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
received: 23 08 2022
revised: 05 12 2022
accepted: 02 01 2023
medline: 18 4 2023
pubmed: 21 1 2023
entrez: 20 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive. To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas. Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution. Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought. We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results.
CONCLUSIONS
The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36670042
pii: S2588-9311(23)00004-4
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

214-221

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Irene J Beijert (IJ)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Anouk E Hentschel (AE)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Johannes Bründl (J)

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Eva M Compérat (EM)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Karin Plass (K)

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Oscar Rodríguez (O)

Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Jose D Subiela Henríquez (JD)

Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Virginia Hernández (V)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Enrique de la Peña (E)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Isabel Alemany (I)

Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Diana Turturica (D)

Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.

Francesca Pisano (F)

Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.

Francesco Soria (F)

Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.

Otakar Čapoun (O)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

Lenka Bauerová (L)

Department of Pathology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

Michael Pešl (M)

Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

H Maxim Bruins (HM)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Willemien Runneboom (W)

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Sonja Herdegen (S)

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Johannes Breyer (J)

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Antonin Brisuda (A)

Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

Ana Calatrava (A)

Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.

José Rubio-Briones (J)

Department of Urology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.

Maximilian Seles (M)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Sebastian Mannweiler (S)

Department of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Judith Bosschieter (J)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Venkata R M Kusuma (VRM)

Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK.

David Ashabere (D)

Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Nicolai Huebner (N)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Juliette Cotte (J)

Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Laura S Mertens (LS)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Francesco Claps (F)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Alexandra Masson-Lecomte (A)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Fredrik Liedberg (F)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Daniel Cohen (D)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Luca Lunelli (L)

Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Olivier Cussenot (O)

Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Soha El Sheikh (S)

Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Dimitrios Volanis (D)

Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Jean-François Côté (JF)

Department of Pathology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Morgan Rouprêt (M)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Andrea Haitel (A)

Department of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

A Hugh Mostafid (AH)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK.

Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen (JA)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Richard Zigeuner (R)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Jose L Dominguez-Escrig (JL)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain.

Jaromir Hacek (J)

Department of Pathology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

Alexandre R Zlotta (AR)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Maximilian Burger (M)

Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Matthias Evert (M)

Department of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa (CA)

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Antoine G van der Heijden (AG)

Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Lambertus A L M Kiemeney (LALM)

Department of Health Evidence and Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Viktor Soukup (V)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia.

Luca Molinaro (L)

Department of Pathology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.

Paolo Gontero (P)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy.

Carlos Llorente (C)

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Ferran Algaba (F)

Deaprtment of Pathology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Joan Palou (J)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

James N'Dow (J)

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Maria J Ribal (MJ)

European Association of Urology Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Theo H van der Kwast (TH)

Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Marko Babjuk (M)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

Richard J Sylvester (RJ)

European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Bas W G van Rhijn (BWG)

Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; European Association of Urology Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: b.v.rhijn@nki.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH