Spatial Alignment of Organoids Tracking Subclonal Chemotherapy Resistance in Pancreatic and Ampullary Cancer.
ampullary cancer
apoptosis
cancer heterogeneity
necrosis
organoids
pancreatic cancer
therapeutic response
Journal
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2306-5354
Titre abrégé: Bioengineering (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101676056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jan 2023
10 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
revised:
29
12
2022
accepted:
03
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pancreatic and ampullary cancers remain highly morbid diseases for which accurate clinical predictions are needed for precise therapeutic predictions. Patient-derived cancer organoids have been widely adopted; however, prior work has focused on well-level therapeutic sensitivity. To characterize individual oligoclonal units of therapeutic response, we introduce a low-volume screening assay, including an automated alignment algorithm. The oligoclonal growth response was compared against validated markers of response, including well-level viability and markers of single-cell viability. Line-specific sensitivities were compared with clinical outcomes. Automated alignment algorithms were generated to match organoids across time using coordinates across a single projection of Z-stacked images. After screening for baseline size (50 μm) and circularity (>0.4), the match efficiency was found to be optimized by accepting the diffusion thresholded with the root mean standard deviation of 75 μm. Validated well-level viability showed a limited correlation with the mean organoid size (R = 0.408), and a normalized growth assayed by normalized changes in area (R = 0.474) and area (R = 0.486). Subclonal populations were defined by both residual growth and the failure to induce apoptosis and necrosis. For a culture with clinical resistance to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, while a therapeutic challenge induced a robust effect in inhibiting cell growth (GΔ = 1.53), residual oligoclonal populations were able to limit the effect on the ability to induce apoptosis (GΔ = 0.52) and cell necrosis (GΔ = 1.07). Bioengineered approaches are feasible to capture oligoclonal heterogeneity in organotypic cultures, integrating ongoing efforts for utilizing organoids across cancer types as integral biomarkers and in novel therapeutic development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36671664
pii: bioengineering10010091
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010091
pmc: PMC9854538
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014520
Pays : United States
Références
Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 05;9:246
pubmed: 31024848
Front Oncol. 2020 May 15;10:553
pubmed: 32500020
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct;14(10):611-629
pubmed: 28397828
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
pubmed: 21561347
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 24;12(1):5623
pubmed: 34561461
Cancer Discov. 2018 Sep;8(9):1112-1129
pubmed: 29853643
Commun Biol. 2021 Sep 13;4(1):1067
pubmed: 34518628
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;17(9):527-540
pubmed: 32398706
Cell Stem Cell. 2020 Nov 5;27(5):840-851.e6
pubmed: 32818433
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jul;17(7):2190-7
pubmed: 10561275
Nat Rev Mater. 2020 Jul;5(7):539-551
pubmed: 32953138
Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1364-71
pubmed: 26501191
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Mar;77(3):595-603
pubmed: 26842789
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Jun;35(6):569-576
pubmed: 28459449
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 26;116(52):26580-26590
pubmed: 31818951
J Vis Exp. 2013 May 17;(75):e50210
pubmed: 23711911
Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 15;74(18):5184-94
pubmed: 25100563
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(5):2214-2232
pubmed: 33209645
Nat Rev Cancer. 2022 Mar;22(3):131-142
pubmed: 34789870
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jan 10;15(1):e1006596
pubmed: 30629588
Pathobiology. 2018;85(1-2):64-71
pubmed: 28787741
Neoplasia. 2015 Dec;17(12):862-870
pubmed: 26696368
Nat Mater. 2022 Feb;21(2):143-159
pubmed: 34385685
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Feb;35(2):296-301
pubmed: 10448274
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Oct;33(4):245-59
pubmed: 9342501
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 1;25(17):5376-5387
pubmed: 31175091
Nat Commun. 2018 May 17;9(1):1978
pubmed: 29773832
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 25;13(1):3652
pubmed: 35752636
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020
pubmed: 32593337
Cell. 2015 Jan 15;160(1-2):324-38
pubmed: 25557080
Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21
pubmed: 24840647
Cancer Discov. 2018 Sep;8(9):1096-1111
pubmed: 29903880
Mol Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 9;15(3):317-327
pubmed: 28184015
Cell. 2015 May 7;161(4):933-45
pubmed: 25957691
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jun;10(6):792-805
pubmed: 32193223
J Biomed Sci. 2018 Mar 06;25(1):20
pubmed: 29506506
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):251-259
pubmed: 31767187
Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1932-1943.e9
pubmed: 26255562
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 25;12(1):5205
pubmed: 35338174
Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Apr;6(4):1205-18
pubmed: 10778943
Drugs. 1997 Sep;54(3):447-72
pubmed: 9279506
Cell Rep. 2021 Jul 27;36(4):109429
pubmed: 34320344
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13308-11
pubmed: 26460009
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep 06;11(9):
pubmed: 31500168
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703
pubmed: 24131140