Thoracic Radiotherapy in Extensive Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer: Multicenter Prospective Observational TRENDS Study.
SCLC
consolidative radiotherapy
immunotherapy
lung cancer
radiotherapy
small cell lung cancer
target therapy
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jan 2023
10 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
revised:
19
12
2022
accepted:
06
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) Introduction: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor type, accounting for about 15% of all lung cancers. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a fundamental role in both early and advanced stages. Currently, in advanced disease, the use of consolidative chest RT should be recommended for patients with good response to platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, but its use has not yet been standardized. The present prospective study aims to evaluate the pattern of care of consolidative chest RT in patients with advanced stage SCLC, and its effectiveness in terms of disease control and tolerability. (2) Materials and methods: This study was a multicenter prospective observational trial, proposed and conducted within the AIRO lung study group to evaluate the pattern of care of consolidative chest RT after first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced SCLC. The patient and tumor characteristics, doses, fractionation and volumes of thoracic RT and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), as well as the thoracic and extrathoracic response to the treatment, toxicity and clinical outcomes, were collected and analyzed. (3) Results: From January 2017 to December 2019, sixty-four patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 33 months. The median age was 68 years (range 42-81); 38 patients (59%) were male and 26 (41%) female. Carboplatin + etoposide for 6 cycles was the most commonly used first-line therapeutic scheme (42%). With regard to consolidative chest RT, 56% of patients (35) received 30 Gy in 10 factions and 16 patients (26%) received 45 Gy in 15 sessions. The modulated intensity technique was used in 84.5% of cases, and post-chemotherapy macroscopic residual disease was the target volume in 87.5% of patients. Forty-four patients (69%) also underwent PCI. At the last follow-up, over 60% of patients did not experience chest disease progression, while 67% showed extrathoracic progression. At the first radiological evaluation after RT, complete response and stable disease were recorded in 6% and 46% of the cases, respectively. Two patients had a long-term complete response to the combined treatment. The brain was the first site of extrathoracic progression in 28%. 1y and 2y OS and PFS were 67%, 19%, 28% and 6%, respectively. Consolidative chest RT was well-tolerated in the majority of patients; it was interrupted in three cases (due to G2 pulmonary toxicity, disease progression and clinical decay, respectively). Only 1 patient developed G3 asthenia. (4) Conclusions: Consolidative chest RT has been shown to be useful in reducing the risk of thoracic disease progression and is absolutely well-tolerated in patients with advanced stage SCLC with good response after first-line chemotherapy. Among the Italian centers that participated in this study, there is still variability in the choice of fractionation and target volumes, although the guidelines contain clear recommendations. The aim of future research should be to clarify the role and modalities of chest RT in the era of immunotherapy in advanced-stage SCLC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36672383
pii: cancers15020434
doi: 10.3390/cancers15020434
pmc: PMC9857193
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):664-72
pubmed: 17699816
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Mar;11(3):300-11
pubmed: 26723244
Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 21;9:3018
pubmed: 30622535
Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):36-42
pubmed: 25230595
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 01;12:746853
pubmed: 34790123
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 28;14(11):
pubmed: 35681659
Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1741-55
pubmed: 21565397
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):663-671
pubmed: 28343976
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Nov;167:103500
pubmed: 34688894
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
pubmed: 10655437
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;34(31):3740-3748
pubmed: 27458307
J Clin Oncol. 1985 Nov;3(11):1471-7
pubmed: 2997406
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Feb;15(2):266-273
pubmed: 31605794
Ann Oncol. 2020 Feb;31(2):310-317
pubmed: 31959349
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Mar 4;16(1):47
pubmed: 33663551
Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;115(4):842-50
pubmed: 19117355
N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 12;341(7):476-84
pubmed: 10441603
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 Apr;148:102894
pubmed: 32062314
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Mar 22;27(1):1-9
pubmed: 35402024
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e400S-e419S
pubmed: 23649448
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Sep;11(9):1511-21
pubmed: 27296105
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Sep;50(13):2211-8
pubmed: 24981975
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Jul 13;30(161):
pubmed: 34261744
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(10):1561-1570
pubmed: 28648948
Curr Opin Oncol. 1991 Apr;3(2):306-11
pubmed: 1648971
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 20;38(21):2369-2379
pubmed: 32468956
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Dec 24;7(2):100883
pubmed: 35387416
Cancer. 2011 Dec 1;117(23):5423-31
pubmed: 21563176
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1929-1939
pubmed: 31590988
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4539-44
pubmed: 17008692
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jan;24(1):75-83
pubmed: 22858559
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 28;11:744956
pubmed: 34650927
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2220-2229
pubmed: 30280641