Real-Life Study of the Benefit of Concomitant Radiotherapy with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

abscopal effect adverse event cemiplimab concomitance cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma immunotherapy radiotherapy

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 14 11 2022
revised: 29 12 2022
accepted: 04 01 2023
entrez: 21 1 2023
pubmed: 22 1 2023
medline: 22 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cemiplimab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the PD-1, and phase II trials have shown its efficacy in the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy as a first- or later-line treatment. A synergistic antitumoral response has been demonstrated with concurrent radiotherapy and PD1-immunotherapy. However, no real-life study has demonstrated this effect in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a real-life retrospective cohort study to investigate the benefit of concomitant therapy in 33 patients treated with cemiplimab at the University Hospital of Caen, alone (C group) or concomitant to radiotherapy (C/RT group). Our primary objectives were to evaluate the best overall response and objective response rate. Our secondary objectives were the disease control rate, median time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit of radiotherapy, and safety data. After stopping cemiplimab administration, we performed a follow-up of our patients and performed a descriptive study. We reported an objective response rate of 45.5%, including 47.6% in the cemiplimab group versus 41.6% in the concomitant group. The addition of radiotherapy to cemiplimab enables an earlier clinico-radiological response, with a median duration of 5.5 months in the cemiplimab group versus 3 months in the concomitant therapy group. The response to treatment was prolonged despite discontinuation of cemiplimab, with 91.6% ( Our study confirms the efficacy of cemiplimab and radiotherapy in the management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Concomitant therapy permitted to obtain an earlier radiological response, a beneficial local therapeutic effect of radiotherapy, without any safety alert.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cemiplimab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the PD-1, and phase II trials have shown its efficacy in the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy as a first- or later-line treatment. A synergistic antitumoral response has been demonstrated with concurrent radiotherapy and PD1-immunotherapy. However, no real-life study has demonstrated this effect in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a real-life retrospective cohort study to investigate the benefit of concomitant therapy in 33 patients treated with cemiplimab at the University Hospital of Caen, alone (C group) or concomitant to radiotherapy (C/RT group). Our primary objectives were to evaluate the best overall response and objective response rate. Our secondary objectives were the disease control rate, median time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit of radiotherapy, and safety data. After stopping cemiplimab administration, we performed a follow-up of our patients and performed a descriptive study.
RESULTS RESULTS
We reported an objective response rate of 45.5%, including 47.6% in the cemiplimab group versus 41.6% in the concomitant group. The addition of radiotherapy to cemiplimab enables an earlier clinico-radiological response, with a median duration of 5.5 months in the cemiplimab group versus 3 months in the concomitant therapy group. The response to treatment was prolonged despite discontinuation of cemiplimab, with 91.6% (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study confirms the efficacy of cemiplimab and radiotherapy in the management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Concomitant therapy permitted to obtain an earlier radiological response, a beneficial local therapeutic effect of radiotherapy, without any safety alert.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36672444
pii: cancers15020495
doi: 10.3390/cancers15020495
pmc: PMC9856754
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Curr Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(5):e454-e460
pubmed: 30464697
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Nov 1;24(21):5347-5356
pubmed: 29898988
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1325-32
pubmed: 26270858
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 Apr;68(4):545-551
pubmed: 30661086
Ann Oncol. 2021 Oct;32(10):1276-1285
pubmed: 34293460
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Mar 1;58(3):862-70
pubmed: 14967443
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Apr;9(4):
pubmed: 33827904
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:83-102
pubmed: 32113942
Curr Probl Cancer. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1):25-37
pubmed: 26582738
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1557-1568
pubmed: 36094839
Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jul;10(7):718-26
pubmed: 19573801
Cancer Cell. 2015 Apr 13;27(4):450-61
pubmed: 25858804
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Dec;19(12):1382-1394
pubmed: 34902824
Curr Oncol. 2020 Dec;27(6):330-335
pubmed: 33380865
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2017 Dec 23;9:5-11
pubmed: 29594244
Cancer Radiother. 2021 Oct;25(6-7):593-597
pubmed: 34400089
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):
pubmed: 34638410
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 Jan 15;109:1-2
pubmed: 28189183
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Mar;128:60-82
pubmed: 32113941
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;13(14):
pubmed: 34298764
J Geriatr Oncol. 2020 Nov;11(8):1340-1343
pubmed: 32199777
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 May;18(5):313-322
pubmed: 29449659
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):30-37
pubmed: 32822275
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Oct;138:125-132
pubmed: 32882466
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1463-9
pubmed: 26940869
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:250-258
pubmed: 34536948
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Cancer Biol Ther. 2017 Jan 2;18(1):36-42
pubmed: 27905824
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):467-475
pubmed: 33096027
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 Nov;16(11):2598-2608
pubmed: 28835386
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 26;379(4):341-351
pubmed: 29863979

Auteurs

Barbara Bailly-Caillé (B)

Department of Dermatology, Caen-Normandie University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France.

Diane Kottler (D)

Department of Dermatology, Caen-Normandie University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France.

Rémy Morello (R)

Biostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, Caen-Normandy University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France.

Marie Lecornu (M)

Department of Radiotherapy, Francois Baclesse Center, 14000 Caen, France.

William Kao (W)

Department of Radiotherapy, Cotentin Public Hospital, 50100 Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, France.

Emmanuel Meyer (E)

Department of Radiotherapy, Maurice Tubiana Center, 14000 Caen, France.

Anne Dompmartin (A)

Department of Dermatology, Caen-Normandie University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France.

Jean-Matthieu L'Orphelin (JM)

Department of Dermatology, Caen-Normandie University Hospital, 14000 Caen, France.

Classifications MeSH