Prospective Evaluation of Children with Robin Sequence following Tübingen Palatal Plate Therapy.
cleft palate
craniofacial disorder
functional orthodontic parameters
growth
jaw index
mandibular retrognathia
non-invasive treatment
orthodontic treatment
personalized medical appliance
upper airway obstruction
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jan 2023
05 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
14
11
2022
revised:
19
12
2022
accepted:
03
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the long-term functional orthodontic outcome of the Tübingen palatal plate (TPP) in children with Robin sequence (RS) in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Between 09/2019 and 10/2020, we performed orthodontic assessments in 41 children at our Department of Orthodontics. Included were patients with RS (17 non-syndromic; four syndromic) and healthy controls ( The orthodontic examinations showed no statistically significant group differences regarding functional extraoral, intraoral and pharyngeal parameters, or in skeletal patterns. The relationship between the upper and lower incisors was significantly increased (overjet 4 (2-10) vs. 3 (0-9) mm; Children with RS treated with the TPP showed normal long-term functional orthodontic outcomes, thanks to the functional adaption of the stomatognathic system. However, soft tissue growth did not completely match skeletal growth, resulting in a more convex facial profile.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To assess the long-term functional orthodontic outcome of the Tübingen palatal plate (TPP) in children with Robin sequence (RS) in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
METHODS
METHODS
Between 09/2019 and 10/2020, we performed orthodontic assessments in 41 children at our Department of Orthodontics. Included were patients with RS (17 non-syndromic; four syndromic) and healthy controls (
RESULTS
RESULTS
The orthodontic examinations showed no statistically significant group differences regarding functional extraoral, intraoral and pharyngeal parameters, or in skeletal patterns. The relationship between the upper and lower incisors was significantly increased (overjet 4 (2-10) vs. 3 (0-9) mm;
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Children with RS treated with the TPP showed normal long-term functional orthodontic outcomes, thanks to the functional adaption of the stomatognathic system. However, soft tissue growth did not completely match skeletal growth, resulting in a more convex facial profile.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36675376
pii: jcm12020448
doi: 10.3390/jcm12020448
pmc: PMC9864988
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Acta Odontol Scand. 1997 Aug;55(4):223-8
pubmed: 9298165
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Dec;26(6):101281
pubmed: 34602352
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 May;34(3):240-1
pubmed: 9167075
Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):898-908
pubmed: 17029529
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):331-6
pubmed: 20180703
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar;25(2):383-7
pubmed: 24531254
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014 May;17(2):106-14
pubmed: 24397533
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jul;130(1):37-46
pubmed: 16849070
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;35(5):530-539
pubmed: 34132407
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Sep;49(5):546-52
pubmed: 21214326
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Mar;43(2):160-7
pubmed: 16526921
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Mar 9;12(1):46
pubmed: 28274235
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 May;93(6):1301-3
pubmed: 8171154
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):936-48
pubmed: 21464188
AMA Am J Dis Child. 1954 Jul;88(1):29-42
pubmed: 13170810
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004 Jan;41(1):47-52
pubmed: 14697070
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11):2344-53
pubmed: 19837301
J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):145-9
pubmed: 17643765
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 Nov;39(6):604-22
pubmed: 12401107
Am J Orthod. 1966 Apr;52(4):283-99
pubmed: 5217789
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):382-6
pubmed: 10074984
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Aug 3;16(1):338
pubmed: 34344420
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;14(2):
pubmed: 33445670
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Oct;28(4):425-34
pubmed: 1742314
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014 Jan 17;9:9
pubmed: 24433508
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26(2):177-83
pubmed: 1411346
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;47(11):1699-1705
pubmed: 31477439
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Mar;22(2):415-20
pubmed: 21403570
Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:89-98
pubmed: 6963788
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;43(8):1626-31
pubmed: 26315273
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11):2323-31
pubmed: 19837298
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 May;57(5):574-580
pubmed: 31749374
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):763-74
pubmed: 20685531
Head Face Med. 2019 Jun 22;15(1):17
pubmed: 31228944
Clin Plast Surg. 1982 Oct;9(4):401-22
pubmed: 7172592
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jan;24(1):313-6
pubmed: 23348308
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Apr;79(4):451-64
pubmed: 25704848
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022 Aug;57(8):1887-1896
pubmed: 33580741
Eur J Orthod. 2022 May 24;44(3):279-286
pubmed: 34532733
Ann Plast Surg. 1999 Feb;42(2):154-7
pubmed: 10029479
Int J Orofacial Myology. 1993 Nov;19:30-7
pubmed: 9601231
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):375e-385e
pubmed: 26818328
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Sep;120(3):280-5
pubmed: 11552127
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Feb;56(2):168-176
pubmed: 29727222
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003 Sep;40(5):498-503
pubmed: 12943438
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):171
pubmed: 32546229