Three-Dimensional-Enabled Surgical Planning for the Correction of Right Partial Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Return.
3D reconstruction
cardiac imaging
congenital heart disease
partial anomalous pulmonary venous return
surgical planning
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2023
06 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
27
11
2022
revised:
21
12
2022
accepted:
03
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objectives: The surgical technique for right partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR) depends on the location of the anomalous pulmonary veins (PVs). With this in mind, we sought to evaluate the impact of 3D heart segmentation and reconstruction on preoperative surgical planning. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent PAPVR repair at our institution between January 2018 and October 2021; three-dimensional segmentations and reconstructions of all the heart anatomies were performed. A score (the PAPVR score) was established and calculated using two anatomical parameters (the distance between the most cranial anomalous PV and the superior rim of the sinus venosus defect/the sum of the latter and the distance between the PV and the azygos vein) to predict the type of correction. Results: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The PAPVR score was found to be a good predictor of the type of surgery performed. A value > 0.68 was significantly associated with a Warden procedure (p < 0.001) versus single/double patch repair. Conclusions: Three-dimensional heart segmentations and reconstructions improve the quality of surgical planning in the case of PAPVR and allow for the introduction of a score that may facilitate surgical decisions on the type of repair required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36675399
pii: jcm12020472
doi: 10.3390/jcm12020472
pmc: PMC9863474
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Feb;71(2):469-72
pubmed: 11235691
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Feb;41(2):261-5
pubmed: 21733711
Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(11):1271-1273
pubmed: 34643265
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1980-1981
pubmed: 30803777
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(3):388-91
pubmed: 20696589
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 May 27;61(6):1211-1222
pubmed: 35090016
Jpn Heart J. 1994 Jan;35(1):43-50
pubmed: 8201780
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Nov;9(11):1804-1814
pubmed: 31867234
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Nov 29;:
pubmed: 33249480
Congenit Heart Dis. 2017 Sep;12(5):578-582
pubmed: 28608434
Congenit Heart Dis. 2018 Nov;13(6):1045-1049
pubmed: 30230245
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Mar;11(3):455-7
pubmed: 9105808
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Dec;84(6):2020-6; discussion 2020-6
pubmed: 18036929
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 May;35(5):864-9; discussion 869-70
pubmed: 19272787
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar;113(3):903
pubmed: 33675713
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Apr;69(4 Suppl):S56-69
pubmed: 10798417
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Jun 1;28(6):961-967
pubmed: 30726938
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Sep 8;21(1):480
pubmed: 34496844
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;9(6):763-9
pubmed: 21714607
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun;74(6):549-551
pubmed: 33281102
3D Print Med. 2021 Sep 2;7(1):26
pubmed: 34471999
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 05;9:621672
pubmed: 33614554
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb;113(2):e129-e132
pubmed: 33957097