Handheld Ultrasound or Conventional Ultrasound Devices in Patients Undergoing HCT: A Validation Study.
handheld ultrasound device
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
liver veno-occlusive disease
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2023
08 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
11
11
2022
revised:
15
12
2022
accepted:
06
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Abdominal ultrasound exams play a major role in the diagnosis of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD). The development of portable hand-held ultrasound devices (HHUS) has been shown to facilitate the diagnosis of many diseases, but little data on the value of HHUS in the diagnosis of SOS/VOD are available. We performed a study aimed at validating portable ultrasound (US) devices in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). Sixteen evaluable patients undergoing allogeneic HCT were studied using conventional US and HHUS during the first 3 weeks after transplant. The results obtained demonstrate that there is a close correlation between conventional and handheld ultrasound examination in the measurement of the right hepatic lobe (r = 0.912, p < 0.0001), the left hepatic lobe (r = 0.843, p < 0.0001), the portal vein (PV) (r = 0.724, p < 0.0001), and the spleen (r = 0.983, p < 0.0001) based on Pearson’s correlation. The same data, analyzed through Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, evidenced a substantial level of agreement in the comparison of the spleen and right hepatic lobe, while a lower grade of agreement in the measurement of the portal vein and left hepatic lobe. Moreover, there was good agreement between results obtained by the two types of ultrasound devices in assessing ascites (p < 0.0001), gallbladder thickening (p < 0.0001), and the direction of PV flow (p < 0.0001). HHUS device allows the study of HokUs-10 parameters with an excellent agreement with conventional US, and may contribute to SOS/VOD diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36675449
pii: jcm12020520
doi: 10.3390/jcm12020520
pmc: PMC9867323
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Jazz Foundation of America
ID : Educational Grant - MEGS-OTH-7056
Références
Br J Haematol. 2018 Jun;181(6):816-827
pubmed: 29767845
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 28;25(40):6053-6062
pubmed: 31686762
Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Mar;23(2):185-91
pubmed: 22284252
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Apr;34(4):627-36
pubmed: 25792578
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1397-401
pubmed: 7754881
Br J Haematol. 2013 Nov;163(4):444-57
pubmed: 24102514
Gastroenterology. 1980 Dec;79(6):1178-91
pubmed: 7002704
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Sep;24(9):1896-1900
pubmed: 29803752
Br J Haematol. 2001 Dec;115(4):945-8
pubmed: 11843831
Blood. 1998 Nov 15;92(10):3599-604
pubmed: 9808553
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;36(12):1071-5
pubmed: 16247437
Hepatology. 1984 Jan-Feb;4(1):116-22
pubmed: 6363247
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jul;51(7):906-12
pubmed: 27183098
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Nov;17(11):1713-20
pubmed: 21708110
Hepatology. 2010 Apr;51(4):1450-60
pubmed: 20373370
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;26(7):1342-1349
pubmed: 32200121
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Jan;33(2):189-95
pubmed: 14661036
Transplantation. 1987 Dec;44(6):778-83
pubmed: 3321587
Radiology. 1997 Aug;204(2):545-52
pubmed: 9240551
Diagnostics (Basel). 2019 Jun 15;9(2):
pubmed: 31208078
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Oct;26(10):1770-1779
pubmed: 32593647
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Apr;56(4):917-927
pubmed: 33208915
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 15;118(4):255-67
pubmed: 8420443
Transplantation. 2002 Jul 15;74(1):60-6
pubmed: 12134100
Ann Hematol. 1993 Feb;66(2):77-80
pubmed: 8448243
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2861-6
pubmed: 25805559