The Comparative Evaluation of the Fujifilm Wako β-Glucan Assay and Fungitell Assay for Diagnosing Invasive Fungal Disease.

1,3-β-d-glucan Fujifilm Wako assay Fungitell assay fungal biomarker invasive aspergillosis invasive candidiasis invasive fungal disease

Journal

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2309-608X
Titre abrégé: J Fungi (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101671827

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 03 11 2022
revised: 03 12 2022
accepted: 12 12 2022
entrez: 21 1 2023
pubmed: 22 1 2023
medline: 22 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Serum 1,3-β-d-glucan(BDG) is a broad fungal biomarker for invasive fungal disease (IFD). More data is still required to support the Fujifilm Wako assay as a valuable alternative to the widely used Fungitell assay. We included archived serum samples from 157 individuals (97 cases; 33-IA, 64-IC, and 60 controls) for the comparative performance evaluation of the Fungitell assay and the Fujifilm Wako assay for IFD diagnosis. The BDG value was significantly higher in patients with IFD vs. controls (70.79 pg/mL vs. 3.03 pg/mL, p: 0.0002). An area under the curve (AUC) for the IFD, IC, and IA diagnosis was 0.895, 0.910, and 0.866, respectively, for the Fujifilm Wako assay. Based on the highest Youden’s index (0.667), a cutoff of 5 pg/mL was selected as the optimum for the Fujifilm Wako assay with good sensitivity (79.4%), specificity (88.3%) and agreement (84.7%, Cohen’s k:0.691) with the Fungitell assay. The mean run-time of the Fujifilm Wako assay was 70.12 min, and real-time observation allowed earlier time to result in Fujifilm Wako vs. Fungitell assay (37 vs. 120 min, p: < 0.0001). Thus, our findings support the diagnostic value of the Fujifilm Wako assay for the diagnosis of IFD. However, there is still a need to validate diagnostic protocols to optimize their use in multi-centre studies with different patient groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36675827
pii: jof9010006
doi: 10.3390/jof9010006
pmc: PMC9861801
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):e149-e162
pubmed: 33333012
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6):
pubmed: 30918045
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan;27(1):59-67
pubmed: 11280674
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0255172
pubmed: 34437556
Mycoses. 2021 Feb;64(2):212-219
pubmed: 33156525
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):557-563
pubmed: 30880706
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376
pubmed: 31802125
Mycoses. 2020 Dec;63(12):1299-1310
pubmed: 32810888
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236095
pubmed: 32726358
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 Aug 27;56(9):
pubmed: 29899003
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul 1;186(1):56-64
pubmed: 22517788
J Fungi (Basel). 2019 Jan 17;5(1):
pubmed: 30658509

Auteurs

Shreya Singh (S)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Rimjhim Kanaujia (R)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Sourav Agnihotri (S)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Harsimran Kaur (H)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Arunaloke Chakrabarti (A)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy (SM)

Department of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.

Classifications MeSH