Targeting Neuroinflammation to Alleviate Chronic Olfactory Dysfunction in Long COVID: A Role for Investigating Disease-Modifying Therapy (DMT)?
COVID-19
PASC
SARS-CoV-2
TDM
anosmia
disease-modifying therapy
hyposmia
interferon
long COVID
long-haul COVID
multiple sclerosis
neuroinflammation
olfaction
olfactory
olfactory training
post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection
smell
smell disorders
threshold detection identification
Journal
Life (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-1729
Titre abrégé: Life (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101580444
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2023
13 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
04
12
2022
revised:
07
01
2023
accepted:
12
01
2023
entrez:
21
1
2023
pubmed:
22
1
2023
medline:
22
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic olfactory dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs in approximately 10% of patients with COVID-19-induced anosmia, and it is a growing public health concern. A regimen of olfactory training and anti-neuroinflammatory therapy with co-ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide with luteolin (um-PEA-LUT) has shown promising results in clinical trials; however, approximately 15% of treated patients do not achieve full recovery of a normal olfactory threshold, and almost 5% have no recovery. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), which are used to treat autoimmune neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis (MS), have not been studied for treating persistent inflammation in refractory post-COVID-19 smell disorder. This study evaluated COVID-19-related smell loss and MS-related smell loss, comparing the responses to different therapies. Forty patients with MS and 45 reporting post-COVID-19 olfactory disorders were included in the study. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy and were evaluated by using validated Sniffin' Sticks testing. The patients with long COVID were treated for three months with um-PEA-LUT plus olfactory training. The patients with MS were treated with DMTs. Olfactory functions before and after treatment were analyzed in both groups. At the experimental endpoint, 13 patients in the COVID-19 group treated with um-PEA-LUT had residual olfactory impairment versus 10 patients in the MS group treated with DMTs. The severity of the persistent olfactory loss was lower in the MS group, and the patients with MS treated with IFN-beta and glatiramer acetate had the preservation of olfactory function. These data provide a rationale for considering prospective trials investigating the efficacy of DMTs for post-COVID-19 olfactory disorders that are refractory to um-PEA-LUT with olfactory training. This study is the first to consider the role of DMT in treating refractory post-viral olfactory loss in patients with long COVID.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36676175
pii: life13010226
doi: 10.3390/life13010226
pmc: PMC9863729
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Cells. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):
pubmed: 36010630
Neurology. 2000 Nov 28;55(10):1497-505
pubmed: 11094104
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jan;26(1):1-3
pubmed: 35049034
J Neuroinflammation. 2014 Jun 03;11:98
pubmed: 24889886
Physiol Behav. 2017 Jan 1;168:24-30
pubmed: 27780720
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:136-153
pubmed: 26990767
Mult Scler. 2019 Feb;25(2):267-274
pubmed: 29185867
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Jan;110(1-2):1-7, e1
pubmed: 23450985
J Neuroimmunol. 2013 Jan 15;254(1-2):117-24
pubmed: 23141166
Neurotherapeutics. 2016 Apr;13(2):428-38
pubmed: 26857391
Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 24;11:549842
pubmed: 33072089
PLoS One. 2014 May 02;9(5):e96256
pubmed: 24788965
Ann Neurol. 2020 Jul;88(1):123-136
pubmed: 32293054
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Jan;26(2):347-349
pubmed: 35113409
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;57(8):1011-2
pubmed: 8057099
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022 Oct;76:102608
pubmed: 35863101
Mult Scler. 2000 Dec;6(6):386-90
pubmed: 11212134
Front Cell Neurosci. 2014 May 22;8:138
pubmed: 24904283
Mult Scler. 2020 Jan;26(1):57-68
pubmed: 30465490
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 May 15;7(4):
pubmed: 32414755
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):9310
pubmed: 32518271
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2022 Sep;31(9):945-955
pubmed: 35983993
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9:CD013876
pubmed: 36062970
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Apr 06;14(4):
pubmed: 33917573
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 2;354(9):942-55
pubmed: 16510748
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 26;336(26):1918-9
pubmed: 9198762
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(6):2196-2200
pubmed: 35363370
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022;20(10):2001-2012
pubmed: 35450527
J R Soc Med. 2021 Sep;114(9):428-442
pubmed: 34265229
J Neurol Sci. 1999 Oct 15;168(2):127-30
pubmed: 10526195
Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(5):693-730
pubmed: 27981909
Trends Immunol. 2020 Dec;41(12):1100-1115
pubmed: 33132005
J Immunol. 2019 Dec 15;203(12):3436-3446
pubmed: 31732527
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Jun;25(11):4156-4162
pubmed: 34156697
Mult Scler. 2011 Aug;17(8):964-9
pubmed: 21372115
J Neuroinflammation. 2019 Feb 18;16(1):44
pubmed: 30777084
Cell Rep. 2021 May 11;35(6):109112
pubmed: 33979622
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 24;12(2):
pubmed: 35203918
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jan;164(1):82-86
pubmed: 32662745
Cureus. 2020 Aug 5;12(8):e9564
pubmed: 32905534
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 Aug;63(2):145-51
pubmed: 9285449
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 04;12:707207
pubmed: 34421805
Neurology. 1999 Sep 11;53(4):880-2
pubmed: 10489062
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Apr 1;43(5):1548-1560
pubmed: 35083823