Embryo transfer learning using medical simulation tools: a comparison of two embryo transfer simulators.


Journal

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
ISSN: 2468-7847
Titre abrégé: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101701588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 02 05 2022
revised: 11 10 2022
accepted: 18 01 2023
pubmed: 23 1 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
entrez: 22 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Embryo transfer(ET) is one of the main procedures to become pregnant by assisted reproductive technology(ART). Simulation training is a way to improve the skills of clinicians. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interest of trainees in learning embryo transfer using simulators. An observational study was conducted at the University hospital-based research center. Trainees, comprising midwives and resident or graduated gynecologists, who attended the medical training for infertility and ART in June 2019, were included. They trained on two ET simulators (Simulator A and B) and complete an anonymously online questionnaire. A sub-group analysis focusing on graduated gynecologists not performing ET in current practice, was performed. Thirty-two trainees were included. Trainees felt that ET simulators should be used in medical education to promote learning how to perform the ET procedure (n=26, 81.3% for Simulator A and n=21, 65.5% for Simulator B; p=0.31). The use of both simulators improved the level of self-confidence (81.3% and 75.0% respectively; p=0.55). Significant differences in the global and in the subgroup analysis (n=24) in favor of Simulator A were observed regarding learning the precision of the ET procedure (p<0.01), the pathway to introduce the catheter into the uterine cavity (p<0.05), and the guidance for proper placement of the catheter into the uterine cavity (p=0.03). In the subgroup analysis of graduated gynecologists not performing ET in current practice, Simulator A was found more realistic for the visualization of the introduction of the catheter into the uterine cavity (p=0.01) and more useful to learn about difficult cases (p=0.03). Students expressed a high level of interest in ET simulators to improve their skills. Although the simulators displayed some differences regarding learning the precision of the ET procedure, both improved the level of self-confidence. This new learning method needs to be further developed in order to offer to trainees the most realistic simulators. This study was approved for publication by the Ethics Review Committee of the Cochin University Hospital (CLEP) (n° AAA-2020-08016) retrospectively registered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36682581
pii: S2468-7847(23)00010-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102542
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Observational Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102542

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Mathilde Bourdon (M)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France; Department 3I « Infection, Immunité et inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, France.

Marion Ouazana (M)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Chloe Maignien (C)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Khaled Pocate Cheriet (K)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of histology -embryology and reproductive biology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Catherine Patrat (C)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of histology -embryology and reproductive biology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Louis Marcellin (L)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France; Department 3I « Infection, Immunité et inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, France.

Juia Gonnot (J)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Celie Cervantes (C)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Emmanuelle Laviron (E)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Valerie Blanchet (V)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.

Charles Chapron (C)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France; Department 3I « Infection, Immunité et inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, France.

Pietro Santulli (P)

Université de Paris, Faculty of Medicine, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France; Department 3I « Infection, Immunité et inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, France. Electronic address: pietro.santulli@aphp.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH