Sprayable tissue adhesive with biodegradation tuned for prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions.
adhesion barrier
surface erosion
tissue adhesive
tuned biodegradation
Journal
Bioengineering & translational medicine
ISSN: 2380-6761
Titre abrégé: Bioeng Transl Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101689146
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
11
03
2022
revised:
20
04
2022
accepted:
23
04
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
24
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adhesions are dense, fibrous bridges that adjoin tissue surfaces due to uncontrolled inflammation following postoperative mesothelial injury. A widely used adhesion barrier material in Seprafilm often fails to prevent transverse scar tissue deposition because of its poor mechanical properties, rapid degradation profile, and difficulty in precise application. Solution blow spinning (SBS), a polymer fiber deposition technique, allows for the placement of in situ tissue-conforming and tissue-adherent scaffolds with exceptional mechanical properties. While biodegradable polymers such as poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) have desirable strength, they exhibit bulk biodegradation rates and inflammatory profiles that limit their use as adhesion barriers and result in poor tissue adhesion. Here, viscoelastic poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) is used for its pertinent biodegradation mechanism. Because it degrades via surface erosion, spray deposited PLCL fibers can dissolve new connections formed by inflamed tissue, allowing them to function as an effective, durable, and easy-to-apply adhesion barrier. Degradation kinetics are tuned to match adhesion formation through the design of PLCL blends comprised of highly adhesive "low"-molecular weight (LMW) constituents in a mechanically robust "high"-molecular weight (HMW) matrix. In vitro studies demonstrate that blending LMW PLCL (30% w/v) with HMW PLCL (70% w/v) yields an anti-fibrotic yet tissue-adhesive polymer sealant with a 14-day erosion rate countering adhesion formation. PLCL blends additionally exhibit improved wet tissue adhesion strength (~10 kPa) over a 14-day period versus previously explored biodegradable polymer compositions, such as PLGA. In a mouse cecal ligation model, select PLCL blends significantly reduce abdominal adhesions severity versus no treatment and Seprafilm-treated controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36684071
doi: 10.1002/btm2.10335
pii: BTM210335
pmc: PMC9842025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e10335Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Jan;72(1):60-3
pubmed: 2301905
Front Chem. 2020 Dec 11;8:604236
pubmed: 33363113
Dis Colon Rectum. 2003 Oct;46(10):1310-9
pubmed: 14530667
J Appl Biomater. 1994 Summer;5(2):151-7
pubmed: 10147175
World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 7;17(41):4545-53
pubmed: 22147959
Tech Coloproctol. 2005 Apr;9(1):29-33
pubmed: 15868496
Chem Rev. 2021 Sep 22;121(18):11336-11384
pubmed: 33507740
Gynecol Surg. 2012 Sep;9(3):237-245
pubmed: 22837732
Pharm Biol. 2016 Nov;54(11):2555-2559
pubmed: 27180834
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014 May-Jun;109(3):293-8
pubmed: 24956331
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020 Apr 8;12(14):16050-16057
pubmed: 32191429
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jun;150(2):111-8
pubmed: 20382467
Gynecol Surg. 2012 Sep;9(3):247-257
pubmed: 22837733
Bioeng Transl Med. 2019 Dec 13;5(1):e10149
pubmed: 31989038
Am Surg. 2005 Oct;71(10):861-3
pubmed: 16468536
Biofouling. 2003 Apr;19 Suppl:83-90
pubmed: 14618708
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 30;8:373
pubmed: 32426347
Can J Surg. 2007 Aug;50(4):291-300
pubmed: 17897517
Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(2):129-40
pubmed: 10422196
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Aug;52(8):1308-1312
pubmed: 27956071
J Tissue Eng. 2020 Jul 2;11:2041731420934806
pubmed: 32670538
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jul;17(7):1017-22
pubmed: 12632122
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993 May;75(3):147-53
pubmed: 8323205
Adv Mater. 2015 Dec 22;27(48):8056-61
pubmed: 26554545
Biofabrication. 2012 Dec;4(4):042001
pubmed: 23164720
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 1):1396-403
pubmed: 8178880
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):91-111
pubmed: 20036389
Acta Biomater. 2019 May;90:205-216
pubmed: 30954624
Ann Surg. 2002 Feb;235(2):193-9
pubmed: 11807358
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):5-9
pubmed: 9076446
Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):556-66
pubmed: 11727864
ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021 Aug 9;7(8):3908-3916
pubmed: 34323468
Nat Biomed Eng. 2019 Aug;3(8):611-620
pubmed: 31391596
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Dec;42(12):1639-43
pubmed: 10613487
J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Jan;186(1):1-9
pubmed: 9449594
Arch Surg. 1964 Dec;89:1011-5
pubmed: 14208444
Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):547-55
pubmed: 11727863
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;(577):10-6
pubmed: 9076447
BMC Surg. 2011 Jun 09;11:13
pubmed: 21658255
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):898-906
pubmed: 15108105
ACS Macro Lett. 2014 Mar 18;3(3):249-254
pubmed: 35590515
Surg Annu. 1992;24 Pt 1:27-45
pubmed: 1727325