Nutrient deficiency effects on root architecture and root-to-shoot ratio in arable crops.
fertilizer
nitrogen
nutrient limitation
phosphorous
potassium
root morphology
root plasticity
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
10
2022
accepted:
12
12
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
24
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant root traits play a crucial role in resource acquisition and crop performance when soil nutrient availability is low. However, the respective trait responses are complex, particularly at the field scale, and poorly understood due to difficulties in root phenotyping monitoring, inaccurate sampling, and environmental conditions. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 field studies to identify the effects of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), or potassium (K) deficiencies on the root systems of common crops. Root length and biomass were generally reduced, while root length per shoot biomass was enhanced under N and P deficiency. Root length decreased by 9% under N deficiency and by 14% under P deficiency, while root biomass was reduced by 7% in N-deficient and by 25% in P-deficient soils. Root length per shoot biomass increased by 33% in N deficient and 51% in P deficient soils. The root-to-shoot ratio was often enhanced (44%) under N-poor conditions, but no consistent response of the root-to-shoot ratio to P-deficiency was found. Only a few K-deficiency studies suited our approach and, in those cases, no differences in morphological traits were reported. We encountered the following drawbacks when performing this analysis: limited number of root traits investigated at field scale, differences in the timing and severity of nutrient deficiencies, missing data (e.g., soil nutrient status and time of stress), and the impact of other conditions in the field. Nevertheless, our analysis indicates that, in general, nutrient deficiencies increased the root-length-to-shoot-biomass ratios of crops, with impacts decreasing in the order deficient P > deficient N > deficient K. Our review resolved inconsistencies that were often found in the individual field experiments, and led to a better understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying root plasticity in fields with low nutrient availability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36684760
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1067498
pmc: PMC9846339
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1067498Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Lopez, Ahmadi, Amelung, Athmann, Ewert, Gaiser, Gocke, Kautz, Postma, Rachmilevitch, Schaaf, Schnepf, Stoschus, Watt, Yu and Seidel.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors JP and AS were employed by company Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1188-90
pubmed: 25952536
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):838-855
pubmed: 27783423
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Mar;21(3):243-255
pubmed: 26776474
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):447-55
pubmed: 23821620
Mol Plant. 2022 Jan 3;15(1):86-103
pubmed: 34920172
Funct Plant Biol. 2012 Nov;39(11):839-850
pubmed: 32480834
Oecologia. 2016 Jun;181(2):559-69
pubmed: 26922335
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Jun 15;364(11):
pubmed: 28472491
J Exp Bot. 2013 Mar;64(5):1209-22
pubmed: 23378378
Funct Plant Biol. 2005 Sep;32(8):737-748
pubmed: 32689171
Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Jan-Feb;32(1):53-65
pubmed: 24012600
Plant Physiol. 1995 Sep;109(1):7-13
pubmed: 12228579
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 03;9(3):e90287
pubmed: 24594677
New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(3):973-1122
pubmed: 34608637
Funct Plant Biol. 2006 Dec;33(12):1075-1079
pubmed: 32689318
Appl Plant Sci. 2019 Apr 10;7(4):e01238
pubmed: 31024782
Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep;163(1):161-79
pubmed: 23852440
Ann Bot. 2006 Oct;98(4):693-713
pubmed: 16769731
Genes (Basel). 2020 Jun 09;11(6):
pubmed: 32526869
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Feb;11(1):82-7
pubmed: 18024148
J Exp Bot. 2013 Mar;64(5):1403-11
pubmed: 23382547
Ecology. 2013 Nov;94(11):2505-17
pubmed: 24400502
Science. 2010 Jun 25;328(5986):1657
pubmed: 20576883
J Exp Bot. 2013 Mar;64(5):1193-208
pubmed: 23505309
AoB Plants. 2018 Sep 20;10(5):ply054
pubmed: 30338049
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jun 23;11:880
pubmed: 32655605
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;32:93-98
pubmed: 25448235
J Exp Bot. 2019 Nov 18;70(21):6019-6034
pubmed: 31504740
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Jun;6(3):280-7
pubmed: 12753979
Dev Cell. 2015 Apr 20;33(2):216-30
pubmed: 25898169
New Phytol. 1996 Feb;132(2):281-8
pubmed: 11541132
Plant Physiol. 2015 Apr;167(4):1430-9
pubmed: 25699587
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 17;369(1639):20120273
pubmed: 24535385
J Exp Bot. 2020 Aug 6;71(16):4751-4762
pubmed: 32347952
Ann Bot. 2013 Oct;112(6):973-82
pubmed: 23925972
J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(1):59-68
pubmed: 21118824
BMC Plant Biol. 2010 Apr 27;10:75
pubmed: 20423508
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37726
pubmed: 22624062
Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):691-703
pubmed: 29118249
Plant Direct. 2021 Mar 16;5(3):e00310
pubmed: 33748655
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):253-66
pubmed: 23378521