Bilingualism and creativity across development: Evidence from divergent thinking and convergent thinking.
bilingualism
children and adolescents
convergent thinking
cortical thickness
divergent thinking
gray matter volume
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
09
2022
accepted:
19
12
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
24
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of creativity from bilingualism. Divergent thinking and convergent thinking are considered the two most important components of creativity. Various (although not all) studies have concluded that bilingual children outperform monolingual children in divergent thinking, however, no study on children or adolescents so far has explored the relation between bilingualism and convergent thinking, or the brain structural basis of interaction between bilingualism and creativity. This study aimed to explore the impact of bilingualism on both convergent and divergent thinking in children and adolescents based on neuropsychological assessments, and the possible structural basis of the effect of bilingualism on creativity by a whole-brain analysis of regional gray matter volume (rGMV) and cortical thickness in children and adolescents. 92 healthy children and adolescents of age 4-18 were recruited from public or private schools in the French-speaking side of Switzerland. Demographic data of the participants were collected, including gender, age, pedagogy, usage of language, and parents' socioeconomic status. Most of the participants underwent the neuropsychological assessments of divergent thinking, convergent thinking, and fluid intelligence. Structural image data of 75 participants were analyzed. Both voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM) were processed, to perform the analyses of rGMV and cortical thickness respectively. The outcomes indicated that convergent thinking, but not divergent thinking benefits from bilingualism in children and adolescents. However, this bilingual advantage appears to weaken across development. Unexpectedly, no significant correlation between morphometry and bilingualism was found. Neither divergent thinking scores nor convergent thinking scores showed any significant correlation with rGMV. However, the whole brain SBM showed that the cortical thickness in the right supplementary motor area (SMA) was negatively correlated with convergent thinking scores, which suggested that the children and adolescents with higher convergent thinking abilities may have thinner, more mature, and more activated cortex in the right SMA. Bilingualism and cortical thinness in the right SMA might facilitate convergent thinking independently, by enhancing this selective ability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36684844
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1058803
pmc: PMC9859714
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1058803Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Zheng, Denervaud and Durrleman.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Nov;43(16):4817-4834
pubmed: 35848371
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 24;8(1):6477
pubmed: 29691468
Child Dev Perspect. 2015 Jun 1;9(2):117-121
pubmed: 26019718
Cortex. 2013 Feb;49(2):605-8
pubmed: 23294573
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 26;7:e7776
pubmed: 31579628
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 May 21;13:154
pubmed: 31178707
Neuroimage. 2010 Jun;51(2):578-85
pubmed: 20226253
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jul;49(9):2527-32
pubmed: 21600905
Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov 30;2004:4
pubmed: 16012677
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;1(3):313-23
pubmed: 21743820
Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(1):17-24
pubmed: 10800624
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2496-508
pubmed: 20434470
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):822-48
pubmed: 20804237
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Feb 1;41(2):484-502
pubmed: 31600019
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:336-48
pubmed: 23041529
AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1951 Sep;66(3):289-317
pubmed: 14867993
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):535-43
pubmed: 18420426
Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:216-229
pubmed: 27919546
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2010 Summer;15(3):263-73
pubmed: 20403818
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Sep 14;683:104-110
pubmed: 29936269
Span J Psychol. 2019 Mar 19;22:E12
pubmed: 30885285
Brain Cogn. 2016 Mar;103:70-6
pubmed: 26855062
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Sep 26;97(20):11050-5
pubmed: 10984517
Neuropsychology. 2002 Oct;16(4):562-76
pubmed: 12382994
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 24;15(6):e0234928
pubmed: 32579582
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 10;2:273
pubmed: 22084634
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 05;8(11):e79272
pubmed: 24223921
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 08;7:330
pubmed: 23847503
Int J Billing. 2019 Dec;23(6):1278-1290
pubmed: 34629935
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2006 Nov;132(4):355-429
pubmed: 18341234
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 1998 Spring;3(2):135-42
pubmed: 15579860