Attending live sporting events predicts subjective wellbeing and reduces loneliness.
life satisfaction
loneliness
sports spectatorship
wellbeing
worthwhile life
Journal
Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
08
07
2022
accepted:
09
12
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
25
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study explored whether attending live sporting events (LSEs) improved subjective wellbeing and loneliness, above and beyond demographic predictors. Secondary data from 7,249 adults from the Taking Part 2019-20 survey (UK household survey of participation in culture and sport) were analyzed. Multiple linear regressions captured the effect of attending LSEs (yes/no) on wellbeing variables (happiness, anxiety, a sense that life is worthwhile and life satisfaction) and loneliness, with gender, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), age group, health and employment as covariates. For life satisfaction, a sense that life is worthwhile, and loneliness, inclusion of LSE attendance in the model improved model fit significantly, although ΔR LSE attendance has positive associations with some aspects of subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction and a sense of life being worthwhile) and loneliness, above and beyond demographic predictors. Whilst the variance explained is small, it is comparable to demographic predictors (e.g., being in employment). As even small-sized differences in SWB can have meaningful outcomes (e.g., for mortality), we conclude that LSE attendance may still offer a scalable, accessible and effective means of improving the public's wellbeing and reducing loneliness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36684908
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.989706
pmc: PMC9848399
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
989706Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Keyes, Gradidge, Gibson, Harvey, Roeloffs, Zawisza and Forwood.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:627-650
pubmed: 30260746
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Jul;28(7):1101-9
pubmed: 26865088
J Aging Health. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(7-8):530-542
pubmed: 30873892
Front Psychol. 2015 May 12;6:497
pubmed: 26029124
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 02;12:492
pubmed: 22747738
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 1;176(9):777-84
pubmed: 23077285
Psychol Aging. 2009 Sep;24(3):696-702
pubmed: 19739925
J Health Psychol. 2021 Mar;26(3):438-448
pubmed: 30582374
J Health Psychol. 2013 Sep;18(9):1199-208
pubmed: 23129835
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):53-76
pubmed: 15641890
Psychosom Med. 2008 Sep;70(7):741-56
pubmed: 18725425
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):553-554
pubmed: 32129811
Psychol Aging. 2017 Sep;32(6):507-520
pubmed: 28891665
Perspect Public Health. 2021 Jul;141(4):226-236
pubmed: 34148462
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1502-1509
pubmed: 29268622
Sports Med. 2015 Aug;45(8):1083-96
pubmed: 26092187
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 22;116(4):1207-1212
pubmed: 30617082
Psychiatry Res. 2021 May;299:113868
pubmed: 33774371
J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):320-331
pubmed: 27600638
Am J Health Promot. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(1):18-26
pubmed: 18785370
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2021 Feb;13(1):195-218
pubmed: 33022139