"I am feeling tension in my whole body": An experimental phenomenological study of empathy for pain.

bodily sensation empathy for pain enaction experimental phenomenology extreme sport first-person view neurophenomenology social emotion

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 20 07 2022
accepted: 28 11 2022
entrez: 23 1 2023
pubmed: 24 1 2023
medline: 24 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Traditionally, empathy has been studied from two main perspectives: the theory-theory approach and the simulation theory approach. These theories claim that social emotions are fundamentally constituted by mind states in the brain. In contrast, classical phenomenology and recent research based on the enactive theories consider empathy as the basic process of contacting others' emotional experiences through direct bodily perception and sensation. This study aims to enrich the knowledge of the empathic experience of pain using an experimental phenomenological method. Implementing an experimental paradigm used in affective neuroscience, we exposed 28 healthy adults to a video of sportspersons suffering physical accidents while practicing extreme sports. Immediately after watching the video, each participant underwent a phenomenological interview to gather data on embodied, multi-layered dimensions (bodily sensations, emotions, and motivations) and temporal aspects of empathic experience. We also performed quantitative analyses of the phenomenological categories. Experiential access to the other person's painful experience involves four main themes. Bodily resonance: participants felt a multiplicity of bodily, affective, and kinesthetic sensations in coordination with the sportsperson's bodily actions. Attentional focus: some participants centered their attention more on their own personal discomfort and sensations of rejection, while others on the pain and suffering experienced by the sportspersons. Kinesthetic motivation: some participants experienced the feeling in their bodies to avoid or escape from watching the video, while others experienced the need to help the sportspersons avoid suffering any injury while practicing extreme sports. The temporality of experience: participants witnessed temporal fluctuations in their experiences, bringing intensity changes in their bodily resonance, attentional focus, and kinesthetic motivation. Finally, two experiential structures were found: one structure is self-centered empathic experience, characterized by bodily resonance, attentional focus centered on the participant's own experience of seeing the sportsperson suffering, and self-protective kinesthetic motivation; the other structure is other-centered empathic experience, characterized by bodily resonance, attentional focus centered on the sportsperson, and prosocial kinesthetic motivation to help them. We show how phenomenological data may contribute to comprehending empathy for pain in social neuroscience. In addition, we address the phenomenological aspect of the enactive approach to the three dimensions of an embodiment of human consciousness, especially the intersubjective dimension. Also, based on our results, we suggest an extension of the enactive theory of non-interactive social experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36687843
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999227
pmc: PMC9845790
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

999227

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Martínez-Pernía, Cea, Troncoso, Blanco, Calderón Vergara, Baquedano, Araya-Veliz, Useros-Olmo, Huepe, Carrera, Mack Silva and Vergara.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:379-401
pubmed: 17015092
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Feb;20(1):19-33
pubmed: 31190136
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Jul;62:82-101
pubmed: 29747119
Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):579-91
pubmed: 20428887
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R875-R878
pubmed: 25247366
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):1-23
pubmed: 27798257
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):684-97
pubmed: 15535779
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:99-114
pubmed: 28506927
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59
pubmed: 7962581
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Feb;79(2):259-65
pubmed: 21055427
Brain Topogr. 2019 Nov;32(6):965-976
pubmed: 31705422
Int J Psychophysiol. 2008 Aug;69(2):90-5
pubmed: 18433903
Behav Brain Sci. 2009 Apr;32(2):121-38; discussion 138-82
pubmed: 19386144
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):225-243
pubmed: 29781776
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):873-9
pubmed: 23576808
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244427
pubmed: 33382784
Bioessays. 2021 Jun;43(6):e2000261
pubmed: 33763881
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Dec;12(6):701-716
pubmed: 27643572
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Sep;3(9):345-351
pubmed: 10461197
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 26;5:1061
pubmed: 25309490
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 26;10:2589
pubmed: 31849741
Front Psychol. 2015 May 29;6:673
pubmed: 26074839
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;18(7):337-9
pubmed: 24972506
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014 Jan;27(1):27-37
pubmed: 23805855
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jan;31:148-59
pubmed: 25486341
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 27;12:289
pubmed: 30542272
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Mar;2(1):62-6
pubmed: 18985120
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;22(11):969-981
pubmed: 30224233
PLoS One. 2007 Dec 12;2(12):e1292
pubmed: 18091986
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Apr;11(4):153-7
pubmed: 17300981
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Nov;29(21-22):4403-4412
pubmed: 32741016
Cortex. 2017 Sep;94:152-163
pubmed: 28759805
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):817-21
pubmed: 23914766
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):98-105
pubmed: 21767043
Gait Posture. 2016 Mar;45:175-80
pubmed: 26979902
Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Jul;34(7):1615-24
pubmed: 22359353
Emotion. 2016 Dec;16(8):1107-1116
pubmed: 27668802
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):3-13
pubmed: 30356938
Psychophysiology. 2015 Dec;52(12):1551-8
pubmed: 26379210
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:901031
pubmed: 35756253
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):181-93
pubmed: 26447580
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):493-501
pubmed: 21227300
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Oct 20;11:507
pubmed: 29104537
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(8):1435-48
pubmed: 24559130
Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 Apr;49(2):109-114
pubmed: 30711434
Psychophysiology. 2005 May;42(3):255-60
pubmed: 15943678
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 06;5:508
pubmed: 24936191
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96
pubmed: 19338504
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 21;11(6):
pubmed: 34205621
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 18;9:357
pubmed: 26150779
J Pers. 1987 Mar;55(1):19-39
pubmed: 3572705
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502
pubmed: 20946964
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031
pubmed: 12239892
Phenomenol Cogn Sci. 2023;22(1):25-53
pubmed: 34744533
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 05;11:987
pubmed: 32581915
J Pain Res. 2017 May 29;10:1317-1326
pubmed: 28615963
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:1-23
pubmed: 22715878
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66
pubmed: 12154366
Conscious Cogn. 2014 May;26:105-16
pubmed: 24705181
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 05;9(8):e104381
pubmed: 25093727
Front Psychol. 2020 May 15;11:924
pubmed: 32499741
Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Aug;18(4):442-7
pubmed: 16003122
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Oct 1;5(10):418-425
pubmed: 11707380
Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Mar 26;7:15
pubmed: 23532205

Auteurs

David Martínez-Pernía (D)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Faculty of Medicine, Geroscience Center for Brain Health and Metabolism (GERO), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Faculty of Medicine, Memory and Neuropsychiatric Clinic (CMYN), Neurology Service, Hospital del Salvador, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Ignacio Cea (I)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Philosophy Department, Faculty of Philosophy and Humanities, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile.

Alejandro Troncoso (A)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Kevin Blanco (K)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Jorge Calderón Vergara (J)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Constanza Baquedano (C)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Claudio Araya-Veliz (C)

School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Ana Useros-Olmo (A)

Unidad de Daño Cerebral, Hospital Beata María Ana, Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Fisioterapia and Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

David Huepe (D)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Valentina Carrera (V)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Victoria Mack Silva (V)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Mayte Vergara (M)

School of Psychology, Center for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.

Classifications MeSH