How decision-styles and cultural orientation influence entrepreneurial and social entrepreneurial intentions: A cross-cultural comparison.
cultural orientation
decision styles
entrepreneurial intentions
maximizing
satisficing
social entrepreneurial intention
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
07
2022
accepted:
29
11
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
24
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This paper investigates how maximizing or satisficing decision styles and cultural orientation influence individuals' entrepreneurial intentions. With a growing interest in social entrepreneurship, it also measures if these factors encourage individuals to start ventures with a social mission. Two studies are conducted to compare students' entrepreneurial intentions in the U.S. and in Slovenia. By identifying that maximizing decision styles are associated with an individualistic cultural orientation in both the U.S. and Slovenia, the current study indicates that the maximizing - individualism connection spans national and cultural boundaries. In the U.S. sample, individualism mediated the relationship between decision styles and entrepreneurial intentions, suggesting that in individualistic cultures, such as the U.S., those who maximize their decision efforts and apply a more individualistic cultural perspective are especially inclined to pursue entrepreneurial opportunities. Similarly, individualism mediated the relationship between maximizing and social entrepreneurial intentions in the U.S. sample; suggesting that maximizers who are less individualistic may be more likely to start social enterprises over traditional ventures. Among the Slovenian sample, there was a marginally significant relationship between maximizing and entrepreneurial intentions and no relationship with social entrepreneurial intentions. These cross-cultural differences are discussed in relation to the economic and social conditions in each country.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36687957
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988815
pmc: PMC9849695
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
988815Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Soltwisch, Dimitrov and Hojnik.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
J Behav Decis Mak. 2016 Oct;29(4):363-371
pubmed: 27840559
J Pers. 2001 Dec;69(6):907-24
pubmed: 11767823
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 02;4:392
pubmed: 23847567
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903
pubmed: 14516251
Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):766-794
pubmed: 10560328
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):143-50
pubmed: 16466422
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 06;9:66
pubmed: 29467694
J Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;141(5):667-78
pubmed: 11758044
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014 Nov;67(3):451-70
pubmed: 24188158
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Nov;90(6):1265-72
pubmed: 16316279
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Sep;104(9):2698-2735
pubmed: 25404760
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1178-97
pubmed: 12416921