Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement.
bodily sovereignty
force feeding
human rights
moral autonomy
moral theory
solitary confinement
Journal
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
ISSN: 1469-2147
Titre abrégé: Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9208482
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
entrez:
23
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36688294
doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000883
pii: S0963180122000883
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM