Outcomes of remote versus face-to-face ear, nose and throat outpatient consultation on patient pathways.


Journal

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 07 2024
medline: 3 7 2023
pubmed: 24 1 2023
entrez: 23 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Remote consultation has potential benefits in increasing patient pathway efficiency and has been found to reduce costs and carbon emissions. Previous studies of remote consultation in ear, nose and throat (ENT) practice have reported mixed results and used relatively small sample sizes. The aim of this article is to study the impact of remote telephone consultation on ENT clinic outcomes and pathway efficiency, compared with in-person review, within new and follow-up patient cohorts and subspeciality, where previous studies demonstrate mixed and inconclusive results. This was a comparison of remote clinic appointment outcomes over a 2-month period from a single ENT referral centre (426) with an equivalent data set of face-to-face clinic appointments over a similar time frame (1,533). Statistical analysis included chi-squared test for clinic outcomes and two-sample For new referrals, remote consultation was associated with statistically significantly greater rates of follow-up ( Remote consultation in ENT could become the norm for follow-up patients, but should be used with caution in the initial consultation of new patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36688846
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0144
pmc: PMC10313455
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

561-567

Références

Laryngoscope. 2011 Jul;121(7):1422-5
pubmed: 21647908
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 Jul;46(4):699-719
pubmed: 33754458
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;44(6):1259-74, vii
pubmed: 22032480
Clin Otolaryngol. 2021 May;46(3):682-686
pubmed: 33506601
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):31-38
pubmed: 28485038
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jun;126(6):718-21; discussion 722
pubmed: 10864107
Head Neck. 2020 Jun;42(6):1308-1309
pubmed: 32298018
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1999 Jul-Aug;18(4):53-62
pubmed: 10429902
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):1035-1040
pubmed: 28140835
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Nov;133(11):1091-5
pubmed: 18025311
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;24(6):1330-1338
pubmed: 30311714
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Jan;120(1):62-72
pubmed: 9914551
Med J Aust. 2008 Apr 21;188(8):457-60
pubmed: 18429711
J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(8):387-90
pubmed: 18078548
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Feb 13;:
pubmed: 36779457
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 May;45(3):311-312
pubmed: 32246529

Auteurs

T Gupta (T)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

M F Bhutta (MF)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH