Artificial intelligence for differentiating COVID-19 from other viral pneumonias on CT: comparative analysis of different models based on quantitative and radiomic approaches.
Artificial intelligence
COVID-19
Lung
Radiomics
Tomography (x-ray
computed)
Journal
European radiology experimental
ISSN: 2509-9280
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol Exp
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101721752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2023
24 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
06
09
2022
accepted:
15
12
2022
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
26
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To develop a pipeline for automatic extraction of quantitative metrics and radiomic features from lung computed tomography (CT) and develop artificial intelligence (AI) models supporting differential diagnosis between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral pneumonia (non-COVID-19). Chest CT of 1,031 patients (811 for model building; 220 as independent validation set (IVS) with positive swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (647 COVID-19) or other respiratory viruses (384 non-COVID-19) were segmented automatically. A Gaussian model, based on the HU histogram distribution describing well-aerated and ill portions, was optimised to calculate quantitative metrics (QM, n = 20) in both lungs (2L) and four geometrical subdivisions (GS) (upper front, lower front, upper dorsal, lower dorsal; n = 80). Radiomic features (RF) of first (RF1, n = 18) and second (RF2, n = 120) order were extracted from 2L using PyRadiomics tool. Extracted metrics were used to develop four multilayer-perceptron classifiers, built with different combinations of QM and RF: Model1 (RF1-2L); Model2 (QM-2L, QM-GS); Model3 (RF1-2L, RF2-2L); Model4 (RF1-2L, QM-2L, GS-2L, RF2-2L). The classifiers showed accuracy from 0.71 to 0.80 and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.77 to 0.87 in differentiating COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Best results were associated with Model3 (AUC 0.867 ± 0.008) and Model4 (AUC 0.870 ± 0.011. For the IVS, the AUC values were 0.834 ± 0.008 for Model3 and 0.828 ± 0.011 for Model4. Four AI-based models for classifying patients as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia showed good diagnostic performances that could support clinical decisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To develop a pipeline for automatic extraction of quantitative metrics and radiomic features from lung computed tomography (CT) and develop artificial intelligence (AI) models supporting differential diagnosis between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other viral pneumonia (non-COVID-19).
METHODS
METHODS
Chest CT of 1,031 patients (811 for model building; 220 as independent validation set (IVS) with positive swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (647 COVID-19) or other respiratory viruses (384 non-COVID-19) were segmented automatically. A Gaussian model, based on the HU histogram distribution describing well-aerated and ill portions, was optimised to calculate quantitative metrics (QM, n = 20) in both lungs (2L) and four geometrical subdivisions (GS) (upper front, lower front, upper dorsal, lower dorsal; n = 80). Radiomic features (RF) of first (RF1, n = 18) and second (RF2, n = 120) order were extracted from 2L using PyRadiomics tool. Extracted metrics were used to develop four multilayer-perceptron classifiers, built with different combinations of QM and RF: Model1 (RF1-2L); Model2 (QM-2L, QM-GS); Model3 (RF1-2L, RF2-2L); Model4 (RF1-2L, QM-2L, GS-2L, RF2-2L).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The classifiers showed accuracy from 0.71 to 0.80 and area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) from 0.77 to 0.87 in differentiating COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Best results were associated with Model3 (AUC 0.867 ± 0.008) and Model4 (AUC 0.870 ± 0.011. For the IVS, the AUC values were 0.834 ± 0.008 for Model3 and 0.828 ± 0.011 for Model4.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Four AI-based models for classifying patients as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia showed good diagnostic performances that could support clinical decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36690869
doi: 10.1186/s41747-022-00317-6
pii: 10.1186/s41747-022-00317-6
pmc: PMC9870776
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Radiographics. 2020 Jul-Aug;40(4):E8-E15
pubmed: 32501740
Phys Med. 2021 Jul;87:115-122
pubmed: 34139383
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;12(4):
pubmed: 35453917
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E46-E54
pubmed: 32155105
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 May 26;7:e564
pubmed: 34141890
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):111
pubmed: 33569413
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):731-8
pubmed: 19820502
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1478-1486
pubmed: 33094432
Eur J Radiol. 2021 May;138:109650
pubmed: 33743491
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109552
pubmed: 33497881
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 9;11(1):5088
pubmed: 33037212
Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1819-1829
pubmed: 33964222
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):338
pubmed: 31941918
Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):682-692
pubmed: 35103535
Theranostics. 2020 Jun 5;10(16):7231-7244
pubmed: 32641989
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):172-180
pubmed: 32255413
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 May;101(5):263-268
pubmed: 32291197
Phys Med. 2021 May;85:63-71
pubmed: 33971530
Phys Med. 2021 Feb;82:28-39
pubmed: 33567361
Radiol Med. 2021 Aug;126(8):1037-1043
pubmed: 34043146
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):E156-E165
pubmed: 32339081
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020;7:100271
pubmed: 32959017
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 14;11(1):4080
pubmed: 32796848
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107
pubmed: 29092951
Radiology. 2022 Sep 27;:221795
pubmed: 36165791
Acad Radiol. 2015 May;22(5):626-31
pubmed: 25728361
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E86-E96
pubmed: 32301647
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1072-1077
pubmed: 32125873
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105608
pubmed: 32599338
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):5787-5789
pubmed: 35348862
Anesthesiology. 1988 Dec;69(6):824-32
pubmed: 3057937
Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1770-1779
pubmed: 32945968
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e506-e515
pubmed: 32984796
Eur Radiol Exp. 2020 Aug 20;4(1):50
pubmed: 32814998
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1191-1206
pubmed: 28168275
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762
pubmed: 28975929
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Dec;145:110028
pubmed: 34839214