Mothers' accounts of the impact of being in nature on postnatal wellbeing: a focus group study.


Journal

BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 21 10 2022
accepted: 09 01 2023
entrez: 23 1 2023
pubmed: 24 1 2023
medline: 26 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The postnatal period is a vulnerable time for mothers to experience stress and mental health difficulties. There is increasing evidence that spending time in nature is beneficial for wellbeing. Nature-based interventions have been developed to support mental health, but not specifically tailored for mothers during the postnatal period. Understanding mothers' views and experiences of nature would help determine the suitability for and potential impact of such interventions on postnatal wellbeing. To explore mothers' views on the impact of spending time in nature on their postnatal mental wellbeing. Focus groups were held with mothers of young children (under five), including mothers from migrant and refugee communities, mothers living with mental health difficulties, and disabled mothers. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four focus groups were held, with a total of 30 participants. Six themes were developed: (1) mothers' experiences of what constitutes 'nature'; (2) sensing nature improves wellbeing; (3) natural spaces facilitate human connection; (4) nature provides escape and relief from daily indoor stressors; (5) nature allows new perspectives; and (6) mothers face a variety of environmental, practical, psychological, physical, socioeconomic, and cultural barriers to spending time in nature during the postnatal period. Mothers report significant benefits to their postnatal wellbeing when spending time in nature. Further research is warranted to understand whether nature-based interventions have the potential to support postnatal wellbeing, socially, mentally, and physically.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The postnatal period is a vulnerable time for mothers to experience stress and mental health difficulties. There is increasing evidence that spending time in nature is beneficial for wellbeing. Nature-based interventions have been developed to support mental health, but not specifically tailored for mothers during the postnatal period. Understanding mothers' views and experiences of nature would help determine the suitability for and potential impact of such interventions on postnatal wellbeing.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To explore mothers' views on the impact of spending time in nature on their postnatal mental wellbeing.
METHODS METHODS
Focus groups were held with mothers of young children (under five), including mothers from migrant and refugee communities, mothers living with mental health difficulties, and disabled mothers. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four focus groups were held, with a total of 30 participants. Six themes were developed: (1) mothers' experiences of what constitutes 'nature'; (2) sensing nature improves wellbeing; (3) natural spaces facilitate human connection; (4) nature provides escape and relief from daily indoor stressors; (5) nature allows new perspectives; and (6) mothers face a variety of environmental, practical, psychological, physical, socioeconomic, and cultural barriers to spending time in nature during the postnatal period.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Mothers report significant benefits to their postnatal wellbeing when spending time in nature. Further research is warranted to understand whether nature-based interventions have the potential to support postnatal wellbeing, socially, mentally, and physically.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36690989
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02165-x
pii: 10.1186/s12905-023-02165-x
pmc: PMC9869311
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

32

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 01;14(8):
pubmed: 28763021
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Dec;123(4):394-409
pubmed: 7996122
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 29;14(1):e0210587
pubmed: 30695019
Health Place. 2017 May;45:124-130
pubmed: 28359908
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Feb;19(2):362-72
pubmed: 24889114
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51474
pubmed: 23251547
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 31;125(7):075001
pubmed: 28796634
Infant Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;40(4):459-478
pubmed: 31083770
J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 23;80(4):
pubmed: 31347796
Environ Health. 2020 May 27;19(1):57
pubmed: 32460849
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1655-60
pubmed: 18994663
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:78-84
pubmed: 26193624
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):269-78
pubmed: 12971682
Biopsychosoc Med. 2011 Oct 14;5:13
pubmed: 21999605
Environ Res. 2022 May 15;208:112603
pubmed: 34995548
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Feb 18;51(1):88-98
pubmed: 34406380
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):315-323
pubmed: 28302701
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 14;112(28):8567-72
pubmed: 26124129
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;77(9):1189-1200
pubmed: 27780317
Environ Behav. 2019 Feb;51(2):144-166
pubmed: 30662076
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Nov - Dec;37:3-7
pubmed: 28882650
Lancet. 2014 Nov 15;384(9956):1723-4
pubmed: 25455235
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):622
pubmed: 34521386
World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):313-327
pubmed: 32931106
Health Place. 2008 Dec;14(4):889-93
pubmed: 18086547
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11
pubmed: 17518876
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 13;3(8):
pubmed: 23943772
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 20;11(8):e046065
pubmed: 34417211
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Feb;46(2):181-8
pubmed: 18950766
Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110599
pubmed: 33307084
Psychol Med. 2021 Aug 02;:1-12
pubmed: 34334151
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 04;18(5):
pubmed: 33806546
Environ Res. 2020 Mar;182:109081
pubmed: 31891829
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 10;833:155095
pubmed: 35395304
Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr 23;9(2):e67835
pubmed: 31341820
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;184:293-8
pubmed: 15056572
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 24;5(7):eaax0903
pubmed: 31355340
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 30;9:2057
pubmed: 30425671
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1422-33
pubmed: 18000081
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Sep;104:235-248
pubmed: 30114665
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177186
pubmed: 28486515
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 04;18(21):
pubmed: 34770112
Environ Res. 2019 Nov;178:108708
pubmed: 31526908
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 14;14:359
pubmed: 25315742
Prev Med. 2015 Jan;70:46-9
pubmed: 25434736
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 03;9:1500
pubmed: 30233443

Auteurs

Katherine Hall (K)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. katie.hall@bristol.ac.uk.

Jonathan Evans (J)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Rosa Roberts (R)

Avon and Wiltshire Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK.

Richard Brown (R)

Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Christopher Barnes (C)

School of Psychology, College of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK.

Katrina Turner (K)

Centre for Academic Mental Health and Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH