A search for relevant contextual factors in intervention studies: a stepwise approach with online information.
HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT
PRIMARY CARE
PUBLIC HEALTH
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 09 2022
09 09 2022
Historique:
entrez:
23
1
2023
pubmed:
24
1
2023
medline:
26
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the present study is to describe a stepwise approach to study which contextual factors might moderate the effect of healthcare interventions and to test feasibility of this approach within the D-SCOPE project. Exploratory case study. In the D-SCOPE project, a complex intervention by means of home visits was set up to improve access to tailored care in three municipalities (Ghent, Knokke-Heist and Tienen). One designed and tested an approach including five steps: (1) a theoretical/conceptual discussion of relevant contextual factor domains was held; (2) a search was done to find appropriate web-based public datasets which covered these topics with standardised information; (3) a list of all identified contextual factors was made (inventory); (4) to reduce the long list of contextual factors, a concise list of most relevant contextual factors was developed based on the opinion of two independent reviewers and (5) a nominal grouping technique (NGT) was applied. Three public web-based datasets were found resulting in an inventory of 157 contextual factors. After the selection by two independent reviewers, 41 contextual factors were left over and presented in a NGT which selected 10 contextual factors. The NGT included seven researchers, all familiar with the D-SCOPE intervention, with various educational backgrounds and expertise and lasted approximately 1 hour. The present study shows that a five-step approach is feasible to determine relevant contextual factors that might affect the results of an intervention study. Such information may be used to correct for in the statistical analyses and for interpretation of the outcomes of intervention studies.NCT03168204.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36691193
pii: bmjopen-2021-057048
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057048
pmc: PMC9472109
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03168204']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e057048Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Med Care. 1977 Nov;15(11):922-8
pubmed: 926874
BMJ. 2018 May 16;361:k1079
pubmed: 29769210
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954
pubmed: 31420394
JAMA. 2002 Feb 27;287(8):1022-8
pubmed: 11866651
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):249
pubmed: 30342479
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 27;18(1):194
pubmed: 30149798
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:110-119
pubmed: 29289764
Evaluation (Lond). 2019 Jan;25(1):23-45
pubmed: 30705608
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83
pubmed: 6380323