Ecological connectivity as a planning tool for the conservation of wildlife in cities.

Applied ecology Biodiversity conservation Ecological connectivity for urban planning Nature in the city Urban planning

Journal

MethodsX
ISSN: 2215-0161
Titre abrégé: MethodsX
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101639829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 22 11 2022
accepted: 27 12 2022
entrez: 24 1 2023
pubmed: 25 1 2023
medline: 25 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The application of ecological theory in urban planning is becoming more important as land managers focus on increasing biodiversity to improve human welfare in cities. Authorities must decide not only what types of biodiversity-focused infrastructure should be prioritized, but also where new resources should be positioned and existing resources protected or enhanced. Measuring the contribution of green infrastructure to landscape connectivity can maximise the successful return and conservation of urban nature. By using ecological connectivity theory as a planning tool, the effect of different interventions (both positive and negative) on the ease with which wildlife can move across the landscape can be compared. Here we outline an approach to a) quantify ecological connectivity for different urban wildlife species and b) use this to test different urban planning scenarios using QGIS. We demonstrate extensions which improve the application of this method as a planning tool:•Conversion of the effective mesh size value (

Identifiants

pubmed: 36691673
doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101989
pii: S2215-0161(22)00363-6
pmc: PMC9860366
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

101989

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 06;7:45571
pubmed: 28382936
J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 15;244:61-68
pubmed: 31108311
Landsc Ecol. 2017;32(9):1771-1787
pubmed: 32025095
Conserv Biol. 2019 Apr;33(2):239-249
pubmed: 30311266
Heliyon. 2017 Jun 23;3(6):e00325
pubmed: 28706999
Mov Ecol. 2020 Dec 7;8(1):49
pubmed: 33372623
Ecology. 2014 Apr;95(4):1010-21
pubmed: 24933819

Auteurs

Holly Kirk (H)

Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Kylie Soanes (K)

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

Marco Amati (M)

Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Sarah Bekessy (S)

Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Lee Harrison (L)

Parks and City Greening Branch, City of Melbourne, GPO Box 1603, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.

Kirsten Parris (K)

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

Cristina Ramalho (C)

WSP Australia Pty Limited, Level 11, 567 Collins Street, Melbourne 3000, Australia.

Rodney van de Ree (R)

Parks and City Greening Branch, City of Melbourne, GPO Box 1603, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.

Caragh Threlfall (C)

School of Life and Environmental Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Classifications MeSH