The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study.
cesarean section
episiotomy
nulliparous
obstetric anal sphincter injury
subsequent delivery
vacuum extraction
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
revised:
28
12
2022
received:
28
08
2022
accepted:
02
01
2023
pubmed:
25
1
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
24
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Severe perineal injuries at childbirth affect women's postnatal health, including future childbirths. First births with vacuum extraction carry an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction may decrease the risk of OASIS. Our aim was to assess whether lateral or mediolateral episiotomy, or OASIS, at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women is associated with prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. This is a nationwide observational study using data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, including women having a first birth with vacuum extraction and a second birth in 2000-2014. Both births were live, single, cephalic, ≥34 gestational weeks without malformations. The association between episiotomy or OASIS in the first birth and prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting, and interaction analysis. Main outcome measure was prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth. In total, 44 656 women with vacuum extraction at their first birth were included. The rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 5.9% (824 of 13 950) in women with episiotomy, compared with 6.0% (1830 of 30 706) in women without episiotomy. Thus, women with episiotomy did not have an increased risk of prelabor cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.00, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.83-1.20) compared with women without episiotomy. For comparison, the rate of prelabor cesarean delivery in the second birth was 20.6% (1275 of 6176) in women with OASIS, compared with 3.6% (1379 of 38 480) in women without OASIS (aOR 6.57, 95% CI 5.97-7.23). There was no interaction between episiotomy and OASIS. Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women did not increase the risk of prelabor cesarean delivery in the subsequent childbirth. OASIS increased the odds of prelabor cesarean delivery more than sixfold.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36691864
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14513
pmc: PMC9951312
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
378-388Subventions
Organisme : Vetenskapsrådet
ID : 2016-00526
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 08;2:CD000081
pubmed: 28176333
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):724-30
pubmed: 22390647
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;27(2):109-17
pubmed: 23374055
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018 Dec;73(12):695-702
pubmed: 30572346
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):59.e1-6
pubmed: 23999415
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64
pubmed: 26994063
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Mar;102(3):378-388
pubmed: 36691864
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):849-57
pubmed: 26676912
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025050
pubmed: 30872546
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jul;95(7):746-54
pubmed: 26958827
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;82(5):906-19
pubmed: 24708350
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(1):62-9
pubmed: 21985470
Scand J Soc Med. 1990 Jun;18(2):143-8
pubmed: 2367825
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Dec;207:193-199
pubmed: 27865945
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Feb;269:62-70
pubmed: 34968876
BJOG. 2014 Dec;121(13):1695-703
pubmed: 25040835
BJOG. 2012 Dec;119(13):1640-7
pubmed: 23078268
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9
pubmed: 18313558
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424
pubmed: 21818162
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0215180
pubmed: 30973931
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):627-633
pubmed: 31230097
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413
pubmed: 28721483
BJOG. 2021 Sep;128(10):1663-1671
pubmed: 33539612
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3
pubmed: 19035944