Subtle magnetic resonance imaging differences in tegmental pilocytic astrocytomas as a caution against attempting gross-total resection: illustrative cases.
outcome
pilocytic astrocytoma
surgery
tegmentum
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jan 2023
23 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
29
08
2022
accepted:
30
12
2022
entrez:
24
1
2023
pubmed:
25
1
2023
medline:
25
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although surgery within the tegmentum of the midbrain is challenging, resection of tegmental pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) is a standard treatment because this has been shown to outperform chemotherapy and radiotherapy in terms of long-term tumor control. Gross total resection (GTR) assisted by intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring can be achieved with a reasonable risk-to-benefit ratio, especially for well-circumscribed tumors, but careful scrutiny of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical to surgical decision making. The authors present two cases of tegmental PAs, which appeared grossly similar on MRI and were operated on via the same surgical approach using the same intraoperative adjuncts. The tumors had identical histopathological and molecular diagnoses but drastically different functional outcomes for the patients, with significant long-term complications for one of the children, which the authors believe was due to a slightly more invasive nature of this tumor. The authors demonstrate subtle preoperative MRI findings that might be potential clues to a more infiltrative nature of one PA versus another and present pathological findings supporting this argument. This report serves as a reminder that not all tegmental PAs can be managed by the same surgical approach. Subtle signs of infiltration may indicate that GTR should not be attempted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Although surgery within the tegmentum of the midbrain is challenging, resection of tegmental pilocytic astrocytomas (PAs) is a standard treatment because this has been shown to outperform chemotherapy and radiotherapy in terms of long-term tumor control. Gross total resection (GTR) assisted by intraoperative neuroelectrophysiological monitoring can be achieved with a reasonable risk-to-benefit ratio, especially for well-circumscribed tumors, but careful scrutiny of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical to surgical decision making. The authors present two cases of tegmental PAs, which appeared grossly similar on MRI and were operated on via the same surgical approach using the same intraoperative adjuncts.
OBSERVATIONS
METHODS
The tumors had identical histopathological and molecular diagnoses but drastically different functional outcomes for the patients, with significant long-term complications for one of the children, which the authors believe was due to a slightly more invasive nature of this tumor. The authors demonstrate subtle preoperative MRI findings that might be potential clues to a more infiltrative nature of one PA versus another and present pathological findings supporting this argument.
LESSONS
CONCLUSIONS
This report serves as a reminder that not all tegmental PAs can be managed by the same surgical approach. Subtle signs of infiltration may indicate that GTR should not be attempted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36692062
doi: 10.3171/CASE22358
pii: CASE22358
pmc: PMC10550704
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1377-95
pubmed: 26517774
Childs Nerv Syst. 2003 Sep;19(9):641-9
pubmed: 12908118
J Neurol Sci. 2019 May 15;400:148-152
pubmed: 30953904
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;79(2):225-7
pubmed: 18202217
J Neurosurg. 1993 Mar;78(3):408-12
pubmed: 8433142
Brain. 2021 Mar 3;144(2):636-654
pubmed: 33479772
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(2):65-73
pubmed: 7710975
Can J Neurol Sci. 1996 Aug;23(3):204-7
pubmed: 8862843
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 15;40(2):265-71
pubmed: 9457808
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(5):311-5
pubmed: 16902345
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jan;147(1):93-7; discussion 97
pubmed: 15309583
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001 Apr;34(4):206-14
pubmed: 11359114
Front Cell Neurosci. 2018 Nov 19;12:424
pubmed: 30510502
Nature. 2015 Jul 16;523(7560):337-41
pubmed: 26030524
J Neurol. 2015 Jun;262(6):1584-6
pubmed: 25957644
Neurosurgery. 1992 Aug;31(2):186-94
pubmed: 1308661
Insights Imaging. 2014 Jun;5(3):387-402
pubmed: 24789122
J Neurosurg. 2004 Aug;101(1 Suppl):1-6
pubmed: 16206964
Surg Neurol. 2000 Jan;53(1):41-51
pubmed: 10697232
Childs Nerv Syst. 2015 Oct;31(10):1791-806
pubmed: 26351231
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):281-288
pubmed: 26918482
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1231-1251
pubmed: 34185076
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):819-26
pubmed: 22375973
J Neurooncol. 2016 Jul;128(3):377-86
pubmed: 27154165
Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Jan;33(1):35-54
pubmed: 27757570
Brain. 2021 Mar 3;144(2):357-360
pubmed: 33693693