Proposal of a diagnostic algorithm for myofascial trigger points based on a multiple correspondence analysis of cross-sectional data.
Diagnostic criteria
Hypersensitive spot
Local twitch response
Multiple correspondence analysis
Muscular dysfunction
Myofascial pain syndrome
Nodule
Pressure pain
Referred pain
Taut band
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2023
24 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
27
10
2022
accepted:
02
01
2023
entrez:
24
1
2023
pubmed:
25
1
2023
medline:
27
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Myofascial trigger points (MTrPS), the morphological correlate of myfascial pain syndromes (MPS), contribute to the worldwide high chronic pain burden. However, uncertainty about MTrP diagnostic criteria remains. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to characterize clusters of diagnostic criteria assessable during physical examination that might guide MTrP diagnosis. Thirteen MTrP diagnostic criteria proposed in relevant literature were assessed by standardized examinations in the trapezius and levator scapulae muscles of 61 chronic pain patients undergoing an interdisciplinary pain assessment. Hierarchical cluster analysis from multiple correspondence analysis was applied to data of the four muscles separately. Examining physicians classified the findings as MTrP, sufficient for diagnosis of an MPS and/or relevant for the patients' pain condition. Taut bands, hypersensitive spots within a taut band, nodules within a taut band and referred pain (classical diagnostic criteria) were most frequent (28-66% M. trapezius, 8-21% M. levator scapulae). Restricted range of motion, pain during contraction, pain exacerbation during emotional stress, muscular weakness, jump sign, local twitch response and autonomic phenomena (complementary diagnostic criteria) occurred in 2-25% and hypersensitive spots and nodules outside of a taut band in 2-7% of the cases. Four clusters emerged: (1) no or just one diagnostic criterion, mostly a taut band alone; (2) a hypersensitive spot and/or nodule outside of a taut band partly in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria; (3) at least two classical diagnostic criteria (mostly a taut band containing a hypersensitive spot) partly in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria; (4) at least two, rather three, classical diagnostic criteria always in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria. Referred pain was specific to cluster 3 and 4. Among classical diagnostic criteria, palpable nodules within a taut band contributed least, and among complementary diagnostic criteria, restricted range of motion and pain during contraction contributed most to data representation. We propose that the definite diagnosis of an MTrP requires a hypersensitive spot potentially felt as a nodule located within a taut band in addition to either referred pain, a local twitch response or at least two complementary diagnostic criteria, whereby signs of muscular dysfunction take on greater importance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Myofascial trigger points (MTrPS), the morphological correlate of myfascial pain syndromes (MPS), contribute to the worldwide high chronic pain burden. However, uncertainty about MTrP diagnostic criteria remains. Aim of this cross-sectional study was to characterize clusters of diagnostic criteria assessable during physical examination that might guide MTrP diagnosis.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirteen MTrP diagnostic criteria proposed in relevant literature were assessed by standardized examinations in the trapezius and levator scapulae muscles of 61 chronic pain patients undergoing an interdisciplinary pain assessment. Hierarchical cluster analysis from multiple correspondence analysis was applied to data of the four muscles separately. Examining physicians classified the findings as MTrP, sufficient for diagnosis of an MPS and/or relevant for the patients' pain condition.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Taut bands, hypersensitive spots within a taut band, nodules within a taut band and referred pain (classical diagnostic criteria) were most frequent (28-66% M. trapezius, 8-21% M. levator scapulae). Restricted range of motion, pain during contraction, pain exacerbation during emotional stress, muscular weakness, jump sign, local twitch response and autonomic phenomena (complementary diagnostic criteria) occurred in 2-25% and hypersensitive spots and nodules outside of a taut band in 2-7% of the cases. Four clusters emerged: (1) no or just one diagnostic criterion, mostly a taut band alone; (2) a hypersensitive spot and/or nodule outside of a taut band partly in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria; (3) at least two classical diagnostic criteria (mostly a taut band containing a hypersensitive spot) partly in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria; (4) at least two, rather three, classical diagnostic criteria always in combination with complementary diagnostic criteria. Referred pain was specific to cluster 3 and 4. Among classical diagnostic criteria, palpable nodules within a taut band contributed least, and among complementary diagnostic criteria, restricted range of motion and pain during contraction contributed most to data representation.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We propose that the definite diagnosis of an MTrP requires a hypersensitive spot potentially felt as a nodule located within a taut band in addition to either referred pain, a local twitch response or at least two complementary diagnostic criteria, whereby signs of muscular dysfunction take on greater importance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36694147
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06129-y
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06129-y
pmc: PMC9872335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
62Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Schmerz. 2003 Aug;17(4):240-51
pubmed: 12923673
Pain Res Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct;17(5):321-7
pubmed: 23061082
Eur Spine J. 2018 Sep;27(Suppl 6):796-801
pubmed: 29480409
PM R. 2015 Jul;7(7):746-761
pubmed: 25724849
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;34(3):427-448
pubmed: 33004157
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 24;13:1229
pubmed: 24365383
J Headache Pain. 2018 Sep 10;19(1):84
pubmed: 30203398
Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):142-150
pubmed: 29025044
Pain. 1997 Jan;69(1-2):65-73
pubmed: 9060014
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Jun 11;26:e20170578
pubmed: 29898186
J Pain. 2008 Feb;9(2):122-45
pubmed: 18088561
J Headache Pain. 2012 Nov;13(8):625-37
pubmed: 22935970
Am J Phys Med. 1976 Apr;55(2):65-88
pubmed: 1266956
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):450-466
pubmed: 27031883
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Oct 1;18(13):1803-7
pubmed: 8235865
Pain Med. 2015 Sep;16(9):1794-805
pubmed: 26052626
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):316-37
pubmed: 26475933
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;28(3):501-515
pubmed: 28676361
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Apr;23(2):311-315
pubmed: 31103113
Clin J Pain. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(3):278-86
pubmed: 17314589
J Cell Biol. 1979 Sep;82(3):811-9
pubmed: 511934
J Pain. 2012 Aug;13(8):715-24
pubmed: 22607834
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Jun 27;24(8):43
pubmed: 32594264
Pain. 1998 Mar;75(1):1-17
pubmed: 9539669
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jan;25(1):80-9
pubmed: 19158550