Implementing deep learning models for the classification of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in human liver tissue.
Deep learning
Echinococcus
Histology
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2023
24 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
02
08
2022
accepted:
26
12
2022
entrez:
24
1
2023
pubmed:
25
1
2023
medline:
27
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The histological diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis can be challenging. Decision support models based on deep learning (DL) are increasingly used to aid pathologists, but data on the histology of tissue-invasive parasitic infections are missing. The aim of this study was to implement DL methods to classify Echinococcus multilocularis liver lesions and normal liver tissue and assess which regions and structures play the most important role in classification decisions. We extracted 15,756 echinococcus tiles from 28 patients using 59 whole slide images (WSI); 11,602 tiles of normal liver parenchyma from 18 patients using 33 WSI served as a control group. Different pretrained model architectures were used with a 60-20-20% random splitting. We visualized the predictions using probability-thresholded heat maps of WSI. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) value and other performance metrics were calculated. The GradCAM method was used to calculate and visualize important spatial features. The models achieved a high validation and test set accuracy. The calculated AUC values were 1.0 in all models. Pericystic fibrosis and necrotic areas, as well as germinative and laminated layers of the metacestodes played an important role in decision tasks according to the superimposed GradCAM heatmaps. Deep learning models achieved a high predictive performance in classifying E. multilocularis liver lesions. A possible next step could be to validate the model using other datasets and test it against other pathologic entities as well, such as, for example, Echinococcus granulosus infection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The histological diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis can be challenging. Decision support models based on deep learning (DL) are increasingly used to aid pathologists, but data on the histology of tissue-invasive parasitic infections are missing. The aim of this study was to implement DL methods to classify Echinococcus multilocularis liver lesions and normal liver tissue and assess which regions and structures play the most important role in classification decisions.
METHODS
METHODS
We extracted 15,756 echinococcus tiles from 28 patients using 59 whole slide images (WSI); 11,602 tiles of normal liver parenchyma from 18 patients using 33 WSI served as a control group. Different pretrained model architectures were used with a 60-20-20% random splitting. We visualized the predictions using probability-thresholded heat maps of WSI. The area-under-the-curve (AUC) value and other performance metrics were calculated. The GradCAM method was used to calculate and visualize important spatial features.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The models achieved a high validation and test set accuracy. The calculated AUC values were 1.0 in all models. Pericystic fibrosis and necrotic areas, as well as germinative and laminated layers of the metacestodes played an important role in decision tasks according to the superimposed GradCAM heatmaps.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Deep learning models achieved a high predictive performance in classifying E. multilocularis liver lesions. A possible next step could be to validate the model using other datasets and test it against other pathologic entities as well, such as, for example, Echinococcus granulosus infection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36694210
doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05640-w
pii: 10.1186/s13071-022-05640-w
pmc: PMC9875509
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
29Subventions
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A532B
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A533A
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A533B
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A534A
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A535A
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A537A
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A537B
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A537C
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A537D
Organisme : BMBF
ID : 031A538A
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(3):231-42
pubmed: 8789923
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 4;7(1):16878
pubmed: 29203879
Int J Infect Dis. 2009 Mar;13(2):125-33
pubmed: 18938096
BJU Int. 2021 Sep;128(3):352-360
pubmed: 33706408
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Dec;42(12):1636-1646
pubmed: 30312179
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 30;10(1):1504
pubmed: 32001752
mSystems. 2020 Jan 28;5(1):
pubmed: 31992631
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jan;41(1):163-174
pubmed: 33710638
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1993 Sep;7(3):605-18
pubmed: 8254162
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Jun 22;4(6):e722
pubmed: 20582310
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9145
pubmed: 29904135
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jul 11;13(1):346
pubmed: 32653042
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Jan;44(1):43-54
pubmed: 31567204
Tissue Cell. 2021 Apr;69:101473
pubmed: 33465520
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2199-2210
pubmed: 29234806
Bioinformatics. 2020 Aug 15;36(16):4498-4505
pubmed: 32413103
Acta Trop. 2010 Apr;114(1):1-16
pubmed: 19931502
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):233-241
pubmed: 31926805
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 May;24(5):1427-1438
pubmed: 31545747