Single vs. multiple operators for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.
chronic total occlusion
clinical outcomes
operator
percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
revised:
31
12
2022
received:
14
09
2022
accepted:
11
01
2023
pubmed:
26
1
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
25
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is limited data on the impact of a second attending operator on chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. We analyzed the association between multiple operators (MOs) (>1 attending operator) and procedural outcomes of 9296 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 37 centers. CTO PCI was performed by a single operator (SO) in 85% of the cases and by MOs in 15%. Mean patient age was 64.4 ± 10 years and 81% were men. SO cases were more complex with higher Japan-CTO (2.38 ± 1.29 vs. 2.28 ± 1.20, p = 0.005) and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention scores (1.13 ± 1.01 vs. 0.97 ± 0.93, p < 0.001) compared with MO cases. Procedural time (131 [87, 181] vs. 112 [72, 167] min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (49 [31, 76] vs. 42 [25, 68] min, p < 0.001), air kerma radiation dose (2.32 vs. 2.10, p < 0.001), and contrast volume (230 vs. 210, p < 0.001) were higher in MO cases. Cases performed by MOs and SO had similar technical (86% vs. 86%, p = 0.9) and procedural success rates (84% vs. 85%, p = 0.7), as well as major adverse complication event rates (MACE 2.17% vs. 2.42%, p = 0.6). On multivariable analyses, MOs were not associated with higher technical success or lower MACE rates. In a contemporary, multicenter registry, 15% of CTO PCI cases were performed by multiple operators. Despite being more complex, SO cases had lower procedural and fluoroscopy times, and similar technical and procedural success and risk of complications compared with MO cases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is limited data on the impact of a second attending operator on chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes.
METHODS
We analyzed the association between multiple operators (MOs) (>1 attending operator) and procedural outcomes of 9296 CTO PCIs performed between 2012 and 2021 at 37 centers.
RESULTS
CTO PCI was performed by a single operator (SO) in 85% of the cases and by MOs in 15%. Mean patient age was 64.4 ± 10 years and 81% were men. SO cases were more complex with higher Japan-CTO (2.38 ± 1.29 vs. 2.28 ± 1.20, p = 0.005) and Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention scores (1.13 ± 1.01 vs. 0.97 ± 0.93, p < 0.001) compared with MO cases. Procedural time (131 [87, 181] vs. 112 [72, 167] min, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (49 [31, 76] vs. 42 [25, 68] min, p < 0.001), air kerma radiation dose (2.32 vs. 2.10, p < 0.001), and contrast volume (230 vs. 210, p < 0.001) were higher in MO cases. Cases performed by MOs and SO had similar technical (86% vs. 86%, p = 0.9) and procedural success rates (84% vs. 85%, p = 0.7), as well as major adverse complication event rates (MACE 2.17% vs. 2.42%, p = 0.6). On multivariable analyses, MOs were not associated with higher technical success or lower MACE rates.
CONCLUSION
In a contemporary, multicenter registry, 15% of CTO PCI cases were performed by multiple operators. Despite being more complex, SO cases had lower procedural and fluoroscopy times, and similar technical and procedural success and risk of complications compared with MO cases.
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
543-552Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Suzuki Y, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion performed by highly experienced Japanese specialists. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2144-2154.
Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S, et al. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe. Circ Cardiovas Interv. 2018;11:e006229.
Quadros A, Belli KC, Paula JET, et al. Chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in Latin America. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:1046-1055.
Xenogiannis I, Gkargkoulas F, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020;32:153-160.
Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Kalynych A, et al. Development of a high-volume, multiple-operator program for percutaneous chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: procedural, clinical, and cost-utilization outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:1-8.
Kaul P, Kandzari DE. Chronic total occlusions: practice makes perfect-implications for standardizing performance and training. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e009724.
Riley RF. Complex, higher-risk, and indicated PCI (CHIP) fellowship. JACC. 2020;75:980-984.
Knaapen P, Henriques JP, Nap A, Arslan F. Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total coronary occlusion: do or do not. Neth Heart J. 2021;29:1-3.
Kovach CP, Hebbe A, Barón AE, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions by single or multiple operators: insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e022131.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf. 2019;95:103208.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42:377-381.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126:2020-2035.
Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:213-221.
Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1-9.
Lee J, Moses JW, Kirtane AJ. How many operators are optimal for higher-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures? J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e023567.
Wu EB, Brilakis ES, Mashayekhi K, et al. Global chronic total occlusion crossing algorithm. JACC. 2021;78:840-853.
Carlino M, Azzalini L, Colombo A. A novel maneuver to facilitate retrograde wire externalization during retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;89:E7-E12.
Hall AB, Xenogiannis I, Burke MN, Brilakis ES. A case-based illustration of a dual-operator, dual microcatheter technique for side branch wiring. Cardiovasc Revascul Med. 2019;20:21-25.