National medical specialty guidelines of HIV indicator conditions in Europe lack adequate HIV testing recommendations: a systematic guideline review.
AIDS-defining conditions
Europe
HIV
HIV testing recommendations
guidelines
indicator conditions
Journal
Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin
ISSN: 1560-7917
Titre abrégé: Euro Surveill
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100887452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2022
12 2022
Historique:
entrez:
25
1
2023
pubmed:
26
1
2023
medline:
27
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
BackgroundAdequate identification and testing of people at risk for HIV is fundamental for the HIV care continuum. A key strategy to improve timely testing is HIV indicator condition (IC) guided testing.AimTo evaluate the uptake of HIV testing recommendations in HIV IC-specific guidelines in European countries.MethodsBetween 2019 and 2021, European HIV experts reviewed guideline databases to identify all national guidelines of 62 HIV ICs. The proportion of HIV IC guidelines recommending HIV testing was reported, stratified by subgroup (HIV IC, country, eastern/western Europe, achievement of 90-90-90 goals and medical specialty).ResultsOf 30 invited European countries, 15 participated. A total of 791 HIV IC guidelines were identified: median 47 (IQR: 38-68) per country. Association with HIV was reported in 69% (545/791) of the guidelines, and 46% (366/791) recommended HIV testing, while 42% (101/242) of the AIDS-defining conditions recommended HIV testing. HIV testing recommendations were observed more frequently in guidelines in eastern (53%) than western (42%) European countries and in countries yet to achieve the 90-90-90 goals (52%) compared to those that had (38%). The medical specialties internal medicine, neurology/neurosurgery, ophthalmology, pulmonology and gynaecology/obstetrics had an HIV testing recommendation uptake below the 46% average. None of the 62 HIV ICs, countries or medical specialties had 100% accurate testing recommendation coverage in all their available HIV IC guidelines.ConclusionFewer than half the HIV IC guidelines recommended HIV testing. This signals an insufficient adoption of this recommendation in non-HIV specialty guidelines across Europe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36695464
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.48.2200338
pmc: PMC9716648
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Lancet HIV. 2021 Aug;8(8):e502-e510
pubmed: 34265283
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2428-2438
pubmed: 31056293
Intern Med J. 2020 Mar;50(3):293-298
pubmed: 31566841
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2012 Mar-Apr;11(2):101-8
pubmed: 22337704
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 11;74(3):521-524
pubmed: 33993276
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):728
pubmed: 33028235
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2013 Jul;125(13-14):402-7
pubmed: 23807043
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Dec;20(4):
pubmed: 29236362
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0220108
pubmed: 31408476
HIV Med. 2017 Apr;18(4):300-304
pubmed: 27535357
Med Care. 2010 Dec;48(12):1071-9
pubmed: 21063228
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Jun;95(4):238-243
pubmed: 30679391
CMAJ. 2009 Oct 13;181(8):488-93
pubmed: 19654195
AIDS. 2009 Jul 17;23(11):1397-404
pubmed: 19381076
HIV Med. 2018 Mar;19(3):195-205
pubmed: 29168319
AIDS Care. 2021 Oct;33(10):1312-1315
pubmed: 33678071
Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):533-547
pubmed: 29606287
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52845
pubmed: 23341910
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Sep;28(3):248-52
pubmed: 16831957
HIV Med. 2018 Feb;19 Suppl 1:58-62
pubmed: 29488705