Core-Level Photoelectron Angular Distributions at the Liquid-Vapor Interface.
Journal
Accounts of chemical research
ISSN: 1520-4898
Titre abrégé: Acc Chem Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0157313
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Feb 2023
07 Feb 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
26
1
2023
medline:
26
1
2023
entrez:
25
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
ConspectusPhotoelectron spectroscopy (PES) is a powerful tool for the investigation of liquid-vapor interfaces, with applications in many fields from environmental chemistry to fundamental physics. Among the aspects that have been addressed with PES is the question of how molecules and ions arrange and distribute themselves within the interface, that is, the first few nanometers into solution. This information is of crucial importance, for instance, for atmospheric chemistry, to determine which species are exposed in what concentration to the gas-phase environment. Other topics of interest include the surface propensity of surfactants, their tendency for orientation and self-assembly, as well as ion double layers beneath the liquid-vapor interface. The chemical specificity and surface sensitivity of PES make it in principle well suited for this endeavor. Ideally, one would want to access complete atomic-density distributions along the surface normal, which, however, is difficult to achieve experimentally for reasons to be outlined in this Account. A major complication is the lack of accurate information on electron transport and scattering properties, especially in the kinetic-energy regime below 100 eV, a pre-requisite to retrieving the depth information contained in photoelectron signals.In this Account, we discuss the measurement of the photoelectron angular distributions (PADs) as a way to obtain depth information. Photoelectrons scatter with a certain probability when moving through the bulk liquid before being expelled into a vacuum. Elastic scattering changes the electron direction without a change in the electron kinetic energy, in contrast to inelastic scattering. Random elastic-scattering events usually lead to a reduction of the measured anisotropy as compared to the initial, that is, nascent PAD. This effect that would be considered parasitic when attempting to retrieve information on photoionization dynamics from nascent liquid-phase PADs can be turned into a powerful tool to access information on elastic scattering, and hence probing depth, by measuring core-level PADs. Core-level PADs are relatively unaffected by effects other than elastic scattering, such as orbital character changes due to solvation. By comparing a molecule's gas-phase angular anisotropy, assumed to represent the nascent PAD, with its liquid-phase anisotropy, one can estimate the magnitude of elastic versus inelastic scattering experienced by photoelectrons on their way to the surface from the site at which they were generated. Scattering events increase with increasing depth into solution, and thus it is possible to correlate the observed reduction in angular anisotropy with the depth below the surface along the surface normal.We will showcase this approach for a few examples. In particular, our recent works on surfactant molecules demonstrated that one can indeed probe atomic distances within these molecules with a high sensitivity of ∼1 Å resolution along the surface normal. We were also able to show that the anisotropy reduction scales linearly with the distance along the surface normal within certain limits. The limits and prospects of this technique are discussed at the end, with a focus on possible future applications, including depth profiling at solid-vapor interfaces.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36695522
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00678
pmc: PMC9910046
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
215-223Références
J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 Feb 6;11(3):1128-1134
pubmed: 31928019
J Chem Phys. 2022 Jul 21;157(3):034201
pubmed: 35868938
J Phys Condens Matter. 2017 Feb 8;29(5):053002
pubmed: 27911885
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 May 9;112(18):187603
pubmed: 24856723
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021 Apr 14;23(14):8246-8260
pubmed: 33710216
J Phys Chem Lett. 2015 Apr 16;6(8):1487-92
pubmed: 26263156
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008 Aug 28;10(32):4778-84
pubmed: 18688520
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Mar 1;19(9):6330-6333
pubmed: 28203664
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2003;54:397-424
pubmed: 12574491
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Jul;90(1):010302
pubmed: 25122237
Chem Rev. 2006 Apr;106(4):1176-211
pubmed: 16608177
J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 Jul 2;11(13):5162-5170
pubmed: 32479725
Rev Sci Instrum. 2022 Jan 1;93(1):015101
pubmed: 35104975
J Phys Chem A. 2008 Dec 4;112(48):12378-84
pubmed: 19006284
Rev Sci Instrum. 2021 Jun 1;92(6):065108
pubmed: 34243573
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2016 May 27;67:283-305
pubmed: 27023757
J Phys Chem B. 2021 Jun 3;125(21):5479-5488
pubmed: 34014676
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2022 Feb 23;24(8):4796-4808
pubmed: 35156668
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Oct 25;111(17):173005
pubmed: 24206487
Struct Dyn. 2017 Apr 07;4(4):044014
pubmed: 28405592
J Chem Phys. 2021 Feb 14;154(6):060901
pubmed: 33588531
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2022 Jun 8;24(22):13438-13460
pubmed: 35510623
Science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):563-6
pubmed: 15681380
Surf Interface Anal. 2017 Apr;49(4):238-252
pubmed: 28751796
J Chem Phys. 2017 Jun 28;146(24):244301
pubmed: 28668021
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 May 22;124(20):205501
pubmed: 32501058