Multistage Reconstruction of Large Arm Defect Using Keystone Type I Flap and Temporary Synthetic Skin Substitute.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
02
09
2022
accepted:
11
11
2022
entrez:
26
1
2023
pubmed:
27
1
2023
medline:
27
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Large arm defects remain a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as local and regional flaps are limited regarding size and free flaps have disadvantages such as poor color match, technical complexity, prolonged operative time, and the risk of total flap loss. Keystone flaps are fascia-based flaps and combine perforator-based vascularity with relative simplicity of nonmicrosurgical techniques and do not distort local anatomy in cases of malignant excision with wide defects. This article highlights the approach of a multistaged procedure to reconstruct a large arm defect using a keystone type I flap and a temporary synthetic skin substitute for closure in a patient referred to our department for wide resection of a large melanoma in situ on the posterior aspect of the left arm. The defect, measuring 14 cm × 8 cm, was initially reconstructed with a keystone type I flap. Part of the wound was temporarily covered with EpiGARD (Biovision GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany) to avoid excessive wound tension. One week later, the wound was partially narrowed, and a smaller EpiGARD was placed in office under local anesthesia. The multistaged approach was completed with direct closure 1 week later after removal of the smaller EpiGARD. No complications occurred and the result was satisfactory with a pleasing cosmetic result after an 8-month follow-up. In conclusion, the keystone flap allows reconstruction of large arm defects. Temporary synthetic skin substitute coverage can serve as a good addition for those cases where tension on the margins is observed at the price of a small in-office procedure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36699227
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004745
pmc: PMC9831175
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
e4745Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Références
J Trauma. 1973 Apr;13(4):374-83
pubmed: 4573255
Chin J Traumatol. 2018 Dec;21(6):338-351
pubmed: 30579714
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):470-3
pubmed: 25524962
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Nov;64(5):654-61
pubmed: 504487
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;124(7):1002-1007
pubmed: 34324204
BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Aug 23;2016:
pubmed: 27555043
Injury. 2008 Oct;39 Suppl 4:67-74
pubmed: 18804588
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Mar;73(3):112-20
pubmed: 12608972
Ann Plast Surg. 1984 Jun;12(6):489-500
pubmed: 6465806
Int Wound J. 2022 Mar;19(3):573-582
pubmed: 34184411
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1589-1603
pubmed: 21042115
Hand Clin. 2014 May;30(2):185-99, vi
pubmed: 24731609
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jul;114(1):32-41; discussion 42-3
pubmed: 15220564
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Apr;63(4):623-32
pubmed: 19303832
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jun;137(6):1909-1920
pubmed: 26895582
Ann Plast Surg. 1981 Oct;7(4):272-80
pubmed: 7032403