Bayesian inference and wind field statistical modeling applied to multiple source estimation.
Atmospheric dispersion
Bayesian inference
MCMC algorithms
Metropolis in Gibbs sampler
Source estimation
Uncertainty quantification
Journal
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
ISSN: 1873-6424
Titre abrégé: Environ Pollut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8804476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2023
15 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
25
10
2022
revised:
23
12
2022
accepted:
09
01
2023
pubmed:
27
1
2023
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
26
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present a methodology to identify multiple pollutant sources in the atmosphere that combines a data-driven dispersion model with Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification. The dispersion model accounts for a realistic wind field based on the output of a multivariate dynamic linear model (DLM), estimated from measured wind components time series. The forward problem solution, described by an adjoint transient advection-diffusion partial differential equation, is then obtained using an appropriately stabilized finite element formulation. The Bayesian inference tool accounts for uncertainty in the concentration data and automatically states the balance between the prior and the likelihood. The source parameters are estimated by a Metropolis in Gibbs Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) algorithm with adaptive steps. The MCMC algorithm is initialized with a maximum a posteriori estimator obtained with particle swarm optimization to accelerate convergence. Finally, the proposed methodology seems to outperform inversion techniques from previous works.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36702429
pii: S0269-7491(23)00063-5
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121061
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
121061Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.