A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive interventions to prevent intrusive memories using the trauma film paradigm.

Cognitive interventions Intrusions Non-clinical sample PTSD Trauma film paradigm

Journal

Journal of psychiatric research
ISSN: 1879-1379
Titre abrégé: J Psychiatr Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376331

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 21 11 2022
revised: 13 01 2023
accepted: 18 01 2023
pubmed: 29 1 2023
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 28 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is an unmet need for effective early interventions that can relieve initial trauma symptoms and reduce symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We evaluated the efficacy of cognitive interventions compared to control in reducing intrusion frequency and PTSD symptoms in healthy individuals using the trauma film paradigm, in which participants view a film with aversive content as an experimental analogue of trauma exposure. A systematic literature search identified 41 experiments of different cognitive interventions targeting intrusions. In the meta-analysis, the pooled effect size of 52 comparisons comparing cognitive interventions to no-intervention controls on intrusions was moderate (g = -0.46, 95% CI [-0.61 to -0.32], p < .001). The pooled effect size of 16 comparisons on PTSD symptoms was also moderate (g = -0.31, 95% CI [-0.46 to -0.17], p < .001). Both visuospatial interference and imagery rescripting tasks were associated with significantly fewer intrusions than controls, whereas verbal interference and meta-cognitive processing tasks showed nonsignificant effect sizes. Interventions administered after viewing the trauma film showed significantly fewer intrusions than controls, whereas interventions administered during film viewing did not. No experiments had low risk of bias (ROB), 37 experiments had some concerns of ROB, while the remaining four experiments had high ROB. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of cognitive interventions targeting intrusions in non-clinical samples. Results seem to be in favour of visuospatial interference tasks rather than verbal tasks. More research is needed to develop an evidence base on the efficacy of various cognitive interventions and test their clinical translation to reduce intrusive memories of real trauma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36708636
pii: S0022-3956(23)00028-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.01.028
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

116-129

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Joost Asselbergs (J)

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Jaёl van Bentum (J)

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Universiteit Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands. Electronic address: j.s.vanbentum@uu.nl.

Heleen Riper (H)

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Medical Centre, VUmc, Dept. of Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Research Unit for Telepsychiatry and E-Mental Health, Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 5000, Odense, Denmark.

Pim Cuijpers (P)

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Babeș-Bolyai University, International Institute for Psychotherapy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, the Netherlands.

Emily Holmes (E)

Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Marit Sijbrandij (M)

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Section Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, Netherlands; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH